gender date has been with some of the recession but donna had the heritage
foundation is quitting the senate
uh... well but you have sense of uh... how
on the money harry strategy has been broderick
faint actor dot is that
and he put out these policy papers and republics guatemala time because they're
so smart over there there's foundation and add back in nineteen ninety three
when bill clinton was proposing to raise taxes
well they came out very strongly acid and look at how right they were they
said quote tax increase would
lead to higher deficits
it served as a receptor recipe for recession
it would destroy jobs
and undermine america's international competitiveness
although he did that turn out to be true
so for example uh... how many jobs and we lose on a broken after a passing tax
rates
alright we didn't lose any jobs we gain
twenty-two
who point seven million jobs under bill good
faster isn't hired her
what happened there was was lucia
under bush that miserable failure
demand one million jobs in eight years and hassling cuz we didn't count
the tremendous amount of jobs that world
being lost in the recession hit that he started
in the very next month after bush left office who lost some of the dirty dozen
jobs which wipes up or wipes out inviting the first two months more than
wiped out
all the games in his eight years so washes up flag zero
whereas clinton gained nearly twenty three million jobs when i when i think
recent expert on build-up
well i mean wages probably didn't grow i mean it heritage from got that right
rolling and bob wages grew by twenty one percent
who would love to go back to an era where your wages were grown by twenty
one percent
well on the other hand you know these taxes spec and democrats
when you do that i'm sure it just toll the rule in the
budget created huge deficits right
once again
wrong
in fact by time bill clinton left we had a two hundred and thirty six billion
dollar
some plots
subplots
so that it's an issue was poli
one million per cent law the wrong about
all of it
so what's interesting is that that's what they said back in nineteen eighty s
all the republican side
and they were so long to get used to buy it of course other banks and savings i
things
outgoing course web intermec kannur i don't know if you can tell if they're
from nineteen ninety three or twenty twelve twenty years
years later
missile saying the same concepts right yours better in ninety three
the problem is not that we do not practice enough
is that government spends too much
the president has reverted to troop warned of a tax-and-spend all-time
democrat
he's abandoned the tens of millions of middle class voters a trusted and
raising taxes on the middle class is not patriotic it is idiotic
except jonah didn't turn out to be idiotic peter and a great turn out to
greet twenty three million jobs
it's
uh... here's richard out there all back in congress at that time as well
he said this package contains largest tax increase in history
and promises deficit-reduction this package
will not reduce the federal debt
or even bell's one annual budget for that matter
devastatingly wrong
it didn't balance the budget
it did give us a surplus
of course uh... surplus was then destroyed by the republicans under
george w bush
because they never balance the budget
you know give a damn about the budget bail of creating deficits not only thing
they care about is not jobs not wages is not the deficit
it's lower and lower taxes on the rich
special this entire party is built up
one lesson is important christopher cox
republican legislator from california at the time quote this is really when the
that doctor kervorkian plan for our economy they will kill jobs callbacks
missiles at you guys
philip vannatter does revenues that these sources hope six increases
hope today
suicidal tax increase
there were a massively wrong then
began nearly twenty years later saying the exact same face
why we know their motivation
they were getting paid by rich people their donors that at that time
they get paid by rich donors at this time
to do their locked and only agenda
tax cuts for the rich
now the only question is why do we take them so seriously
why does the rest the media and all the washington these guys like who really
are what is john bainer mitch mcconnell think
who cares what they think
mujer idiots
who are so long for soul
long
issue you'll laugh at town
every time they come on television these
cautioned me read to them so what happened but you are on bad time why
would you be wrong again
but nobody ever does that in the our normal john bainer almost mcconnell
honorable mike
all they are here to do serve the rich and and every day that should be pointed
out on national television