SPROUL: The New Testament is not suggesting that a virgin walks down
the street and on her own strength and her own power suddenly conceives a child
Of all of the miracles in the New Testament—the miracles of Jesus walking on the water, turning
water into wine, feeding five thousand people, raising people from the dead,
and so on—there’s one miracle story that seems to have been singled out for particular controversy,
and that being His virgin birth. I mean, there have been furious debates, particularly in our
day, over the credibility of the New Testament documents at the very beginning of Jesus’ life,
because the New Testament presumes to teach that Jesus was born of a virgin.
Now, some have tried to argue that the text doesn’t really teach it,
but that seems to be an act of despair to support it. But others just say, “Well,
this is part of the mythical surroundings of the New Testament documents that no scientific,
educated, sophisticated person in the twentieth century could ever believe.” Because if there’s
anything that we know through our research and our understanding of the biological process,
the system of reproduction, it’s this: that virgins don’t have babies. That it takes two
people, male and a female. It takes the egg to be fertilized by the sperm in order for a baby
to be conceived—in vitro or ex vitro, doesn’t matter. It still takes both sides. A virgin, in
and of herself, cannot conceive and have a baby. That is an inflexible, unbreakable natural law.
And so anyone who would argue to the contrary must be involved in fantasy, legend, or myth.
But dear friends, let me say in the first instance that the New Testament is not suggesting
that Jesus is born ""de"" like Athena out of the head of Zeus—that
a virgin walks down the street and on her own strength and her own
power suddenly conceives a child, and this child then is born and becomes the Messiah.
No, it’s not as if we have a biological wonder that seeks to produce something out of nothing,
that we can have the process of birth and the advent of life from no cause,
no power. But rather, the New Testament is saying, “Yes, indeed. There is a normal power,
a normal facility, by which the race is propagated and the species replenished that
we call the reproductive system. And there is a power unleashed through the reproductive process.”
The New Testament’s saying is that that power that we have in normal categories of nature
has been set in motion and injected into this planet by a superpower that we call God,
whose power stands behind all of creation, all of life.
Without the power of God, there can be no egg, there can be no sperm,
there can be no life at all. The great miracle comes from the naturalist today who tells us
that the world popped into existence on its own power. That’s the virgin birth of the
whole universe. They deny the virgin birth that God Himself brings about by this power,
this virgin birth, a very small thing for the Lord of heaven and earth to accomplish,
indeed. And those who deny it put in its place the virgin birth of the universe. It’s incredible
that we have this kind of thinking going on, but it’s there and we have to confront it every day.
But the point I want to make is this, that the New Testament says power
stood behind the birth of Christ, but it was not the potency
of Joseph that generated this child, but the potency of God the Father."