Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe,
brought to you by The Thunderbolts Project™
at Thunderbolts.info
How do planets form?
It's a question that astronomers, with ever-increasing
frequency, have acknowledged as unresolved.
For countless decades, astronomers have subscribed to the
nebular hypothesis of planetary formation which proposes that planets
form from a process of accretion in a cloud of gas and dust that is
gravitationally collapsed.
But with the discovery of thousands of seemingly
baffling exoplanetary systems, some astronomers are now openly searching for
a "whole new theory."
In our own solar system, recent science discovery has
only deepened the mystery of planet formation.
Consider the findings of NASA's Dawn mission at the dwarf planet
Ceres, the first object ever discovered in the main asteroid belt.
The mysteries include why the heavily cratered surface
of Ceres features a surprising absence of large craters, why we have never found
any meteorites from Ceres on Earth, and it's a puzzle where exactly Ceres might
have formed, in part because it's vastly larger and rounder than its asteroidal neighbors.
As members of the Electric Universe community are well aware, Ceres'
massively cratered surface may provide clear evidence of the electrical events
in which it formed.
In this episode, Thunderbolts colleague, experimentalist
Jacob Gable explores the formation and evolution of Ceres in the Electric Universe.
Ceres is said to be a young body, because the surface lacks the
number of craters to be presumed an old body.
That would be using Impact Theory by counting the number of craters on a
surface and assuming a certain number of objects will impact over a given period.
I personally reject this hypothesis that rocks and dust, leftover from stellar
formations smashed together in a destructive process to form planets.
Also specifically looking at Ceres,
it's home is in the asteroid belt and is surrounded by possible impactors.
I'm also well aware of another alternative theory in which the surface of Ceres was
electrically machined.
This hypothesis is supported by what are peculiarities to
impact theory, but are features readily produced during an electrical discharge:
craters that have craters perched preferentially on their rims, or craters
that share rims, straight edge craters that form polygonal shapes, and craters
that have a sort of rippled ridge or distorted ring appearance.
After observing electrical discharge experiments firsthand, I can say with
confidence that most of the craters on Ceres are indeed formed electrically.
Craters we have observed time and time again, stand all like beacons on a cratered
body such as Ceres.
If this electrical hypothesis is true, what then was the
source of such an electrical outburst capable of producing the features on
bodies we observe?
We find possible explanations to this question on
previous Space News, in a video done by Eugene Bagashov
titled 'Mars Mysteries Reopened'.
Eugene discusses the discovery of lower density material on Martian surfaces,
asteroids and comets and these materials are suspected to be porous, as a result
of the lower density.
This finding gives rise to a hypothesis I will agree on
after discussing another video done by
Wal Thornhill titled 'The Saturn-Earth Connection and Our Place in the Universe.'
In the video, Wal discusses the discovery of the deuterium ratios of water
found on Earth and water found in Saturn's rings and how it differs
greatly from the nebular hypothesis' predictions.
Another point to make note of: the two ratios are remarkably similar.
This would suggest that the Earth and Saturn were close by at one
point, or even that we received water from Saturn which is what Immanuel
Velikovsky had suggested.
Because there is a connection between water found on
Earth and water found on Saturn, there's a conundrum that arises; that being Mars,
the Asteroid Belt and Jupiter sit in between the Earth and Saturn.
This is only unfortunate in a nebular hypothesis
but it is a possible clue to what might have happened in our electrical
hypothesis where stars are formed along electrical currents and are subject to
changes in those currents.
Wal Thornhill also discussed a hypothesis he proposed
in which he suggests that the planet Saturn was once a dwarf star with a
plasma glow that encircled planets in its vicinity.
Saturn was then captured by the Sun causing an electrical flare-up
of Saturn and the resulting familiar solar system.
I believe if this were to happen, the plasma occurrent from Saturn would have
been removed and would have traveled.
This could have caused enormous eruptions.
In experiments with low-pressure discharges on silica, the
electrical current can be shut off, causing material to be ejected from the surface.
The eruptions can also be observed producing porosity throughout
the silica, to make note of Eugene Bagashov's video.
So it's quite plausible that Saturn could have played a more
dominant role over the Earth; the Sun came into play and stole Saturn's
electrical current.
When the plasma was removed, material would be ejected
forming porous materials such as asteroids, comets, planets, and even the
Asteroid Belt.
The ejected material would continue to move into the new plasma environment of
the Sun, so it is likely that cometary phenomena was occurring on any bodies
affected during such a migration.
This could have also contributed to the porous materials.
It's very evident that electrical phenomena are capable of
explaining a wide range of formations.
Formations of surfaces, entire bodies and even formations of new
stellar systems.
Electric discharge should be considered among the possibilities for explanation.