Shri Krishna's declaration that those who are worshiping the personal form
reach ultimately deeper and more perfect state of Luke however let us now
understand the reason he doesn't say that the others don't meets yoke he says
this is deeper and more perfect why so god is both personal and formless
we had discussed in his formless manifestation all his energies his
qualities his virtues they are all latent it's just like you have a
matchstick now it has fire in it but the fire is latent similarly in his own
pervading form you cannot see him you cannot witness his pastimes all those
energies are there it's not that he is a smaller God he is the same one God but
those energies are not being manifest waters manifesting is simply subjected
and eternality full of knowledge and bliss that is Brahman and when the same
Brahman reveals himself in the personal form then he displays his soul Kumar is
amazing in beauty is so she'll you the wonderful
manner which he conducts himself he is morally Madhuri who want me beloved me
the sweetness of his pastimes his flute is the one in the world all these become
manifest so the difference is like this if a train is approaching from far and
you take a look at it what you see is light and you could even conclude
somebody says what is that it's a light you seen the headlight of the train
however that train when it comes closer you see there is a shimmering form and
when the train comes and stands in front of you they use you know what this is
too fond me of this is a money to s1 s2 so the same dream when you saw it from a
little distance it was a shimmering form and when you saw it from further
distance all you perceived was that it is light
similarly realization of God as the formless Brahman is a distant
realization no forms no qualities no virtues no pastimes and realization of
the same God as seated inside us as Paramatma is a closer realization
realization of the same God in his personal for is the closest
my fish these are three levels of realizing the one entity
hence waived we us in the harwitum says wadham Tita thought Verma does not come
yet Gianna MA - I am from matey Parramatta matey Bhagawan indicia deity
he says the doctor will toss the war of the top these personalities have
declared that there is an unwise doctor one without a second but diet obtained
that manifests in these three aspects Brahman per month love fatherland
Brahman is his all-pervading aspect Paramatma is localized manifestation in
our hearts where he resides notes our Karma's and at the appropriate moment
gives the result and Raghavan is when he descends in his personal form and
manifests pastimes so Hawaii is the closest realization
that is why it is more perfect that is the first point and the second point is
the less you get from his personal form is exceedingly sweet beyond compare
like for example consider this understanding through this worldly
analogy supposing you have tasted sugar of course have you tasted more lessons
good
in the winters and northern India I take girl it's good for the body
and what about misery that's not even the one that we get Prasad machine the
sugar candy now suppose a somebody invites you to a tea party and gives you
tea with good what will you say what a conduce he invited me to his house for
tea and he could not even afford sugar there was golden thirty and supposing he
had put sugar candy oh he respected me tremendously there
was special tea made with sugar candy but tell me isn't it the same thing at
the Bentley it's all one it's the same molasses jaggery is the same which has
got converted into sugar which has got converted into sugar candy it's not a
different entity although it is one we are perceiving such a distribution that
for jaggery we are saying I felt insulted and for sugar candy is saying
house tremendously respected well suavity it is the same but there is
something different about me what is the difference cannot be
described there is a difference in us that is the point
God is all one but there's a difference in their us the list you get from the
formless from mundum from modern this infinite it's not some material bliss
little Mubarak and the bliss you get from his personal form preeminent is
also infinite and yet although they are both infinite
that free mother this incredibly sweeter than the brahmana because you can see
your God you can hear him you can serve him you can witness his sweet pastimes
so naturally goodness becomes sweeter like let's say there's a mother
there's a lady she's caring of baby in her coupe and she's very excited I am
going to become a mother have you seen a baby no it's a matter
little time now she isn't faint
it's a painful process for nine months but she doesn't feel it I'm going to
have a baby now the baby is born the baby is now one day old four days old
one year old four years old the baby isn't the mother's lap she plays with
her finish the father of her baby hugs her baby servers her baby so he's a
mother this baby who's in your lap the same VP was in your womb is to bliss the
same mother will say is there any comparison I could not even see that
baby it was just a feeling yes yes yes I've got a baby in this is real joy I
can touch him Michael Cerveris broken words I can feed her so isn't there such
a big difference similarly if we qualified the yoke of
worshipping the formless in our state of perfection when the mind is completely
established in the heart upon the formless
we perceive his presence completely in our United minute
but our senses are bereft of any perceptions of his and the devotees of
the personal form with all their senses with their mind and intellect they are
relishing the soul Kumari esashi tears out as here everything of the same not
so it's not there to different gods it is not that there are two different
bliss it is the same one bliss of God that has become so much sweeter let's
understand this truth one more example
have you eaten sugarcane in the summer
have you eaten the fruit of sugarcane
exist how you read it okay okay have you eaten the fruit of the mango tree the
Indian mango I'll like let us suppose that you are sitting and relishing you
are Alfonso from wrath I agree and your friend says and choose the leaves of the
mango tree what will you say this guy has gone crazy he's leaving the fruit
and nibbling upon the leaves all the twigs lately so he is crazy and what
about you I'm very into it it was graduated tell me is all one mango tree
the same mango tree has its different aspects it has leaves it has the twigs
the branches the trunk and the fruit but although it is all different aspects
of the one for the leaf you said he is crazy and for the fruit you said I am
intelligent well you know it is all one but yet there is a distinction the RUS
of the fruit can never be compared with the rustle of the leaf now just suppose
that the sugarcane we also had fruit on it Halla sweet wood baby well the tree
is so sweet how sweet products grumpy some people say yes II wonder why from
Maji did not create fruit on the sugarcane treatment he has created such
sweet fruit on such bitter business so well let us say that he did have fruit
but we should not find fault in rum while ago some people go to the extreme
bah bah ha ha - j.r tonnage of return in ha ha Matata
hey Brahmas tk7 ami donate only colony to put tika devala we find falls and
from Maya's world and they say you know why did he not have fruit on the
sugarcane tree let us say he did the hypothetical case now the difference in
Rus that would have existed between the sugarcane stem and the sugar cane fruit
that gives us an idea of the difference in language that exists between the mana
of the formless aspect and the preeminent of the personal form
they are not two different things it is one 'bless that has grown sweeter so
Shri Krishna has revealed both aspects and then given his conclusion now what
of those who worshiped the formless when they reach Shri Krishna doesn't reject
them he says Arjun they will also reach the
Kony's now if the next verses he is going to explain where who the worst
person to formless reach and then he compares the two paths what is easy what
is difficult what is more appropriate for us and then he goes on to describe
the path of