david jackson and she asked david packard dot com here now adding as of
today eight needed patent remember benefit we've happen asked for it per
month louis before one hour uncut tv show in one
long video file people can watch not cutting out any of the stuff that week
without further utube version
that starts being available today yet another member benefit with
incredible
incredible undercut david packing dot com flash membership
if the ways and for the show
uh... their is in europe and talk that has been released
after much controversy nick an hour is a super-rich seattle entrepreneur
who has been expels in contrarian arguments against many others of those
in the one percent saying
rich people don't create jobs making the exact argument i've been making on this
show
and many others for a long time
which is that uh... lowering taxes on the rich is not drive demand
which is what you need to stimulate the economy
now he said is that it had talked
ted talk to known to be controversial
known to address a broad range of issues but for some reason this particular tab
dot
considered too controversial and ted actually did not release it
eventually after much pressure they did and that putting it out
this is the crux of the can hours argument this is exactly what prevented
us from being released
you tell me
what about this was so different and so scary to ted that they considered not
releasing
clockwise
a policymaker who believes that the rich job creators and therefore should not be
passed
will do people eat terrible policy
fire starter help start dozens of companies
and it initially hired lots of people
but if there was no one around
who could afford to buy what we had to sell all those companies
and all those jobs
whatever that are either
that's why i can say with confidence
that rich people don't create jobs newtie businesses large or small
jobs or consequences for the circle of life like feedback group
between customers and businesses
exactly and this for whatever reason had sent out internal memos
saying that this was too politically controversial
an email was obtained written by ten curator chris anderson
attained by the national journal where he says to his colleagues
this probably ranks as one of the most controversial politically controversial
talks we've ever run and we need to be really careful when we post it next week
eight right
this was eventually released
what do we think guys why was this the topic that hit a nerve which had did not
want to release it eventually they did and it's a bunch of pressure
why is it who is ted comprised of
uh... mostly pretty pretty uh... al
wealthy people but many of them very progressive
i mean all i can think of these uh... who
winter quarter of not one of this information
art
apparently
chris andersen limits on what do you think i think this is pretty clear
because this is a controversy over specific type
this is an even about social issues of contraception
where those things i mean they have melinda gates speaking about
contraception being released
this is specifically
acute and uh... a fundamental
argument right now
that exists among the people who really control so much of the goods and
services in this country that's my thought
yet on the queen edith
you know evaluate the argument i think it's just a question of why they wanted
not to air i mean it seems like you do there was a specific financial interest
in the company in the people didn't want this position to be s balanced all
um... for whatever reason it's threatening died it's i don't know who
ted is size i have no idea me obviously there is you there
political or
financial motivation
behind not
brining behind i want to recess it is very powerful when you hear such a rich
guy saying that reducing taxes on rich people doesn't create jobs it's really a
powerful thing