LOSER DONALD HAS THIS TO SAY ABOUT WHY HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD
BE DISQUALIFIED BASED ON HER LOOK.
LET'S WATCH.
YOU'VE OFTEN TALKED ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON'S STAMINA,
YOU'VE EVEN SAID SHE DOESN'T LOOK PRESIDENTIAL.
I BELIEVE THAT.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
I DON'T THINK SHE HAS A PRESENCE A LOOK, AND YOU
NEED A PRESIDENTIAL LOOK, YOU HAVE TO GET THE JOB DONE.
I THINK IF SHE WENT TO MEXICO SHE WOULD'VE HAD A FAILURE,
WE HAD A SUCCESS.
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT HER NOT LOOKING PRESIDENTIAL, ARE YOU
TALKING ABOUT AESTHETICS?
I'M TALKING ABOUT GENERAL -- AND HEY, BY THE WAY, SHE
SAYS THINGS ABOUT ME THAT ARE HORRIBLE.
HE HAS OFFERED UP SOME EXAMPLES OF WHAT A PRESIDENTIAL
LOOK MIGHT LOOK LIKE, LET'S GO TO THE FIRST PICTURE THERE --
PERHAPS YOU CAN LOOK PRESIDENTIAL DOING THIS, MOCKING
A REPORTER FOR BEING DISABLED, PERHAPS.
THAT'S A GOOD
PRESIDENTIAL LOOK.
WHAT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK PRESIDENTIAL WITH,
LIKE, THE SYMBOLS OF AMERICA, LIKE THIS.
OH, YOU ARE BEING
REJECTED BY A BALD EAGLE, IT'S TRYING TO KILL YOU.
IF IT COULD
KILL YOU IT WOULD, BECAUSE YOU DON'T LOOK PRESIDENTIAL.
OR
PERHAPS THIS NEXT ONE, LIKE, ABOUT TOWN.
THE PLAYBOY PRESIDENT, PERHAPS.
THIS IS STUPID, OBVIOUSLY, AND WE ARE ENGAGING IN WHAT HE WANTS.
ISN'T IT KIND OF FUNNY THAT A MAN WHOSE FACE LOOKS LIKE A
SPHINCTER HAS THE AUDACITY TO SAY HILLARY CLINTON DOESN'T HAVE
A PRESIDENTIAL LOOK?
BY THE WAY, WHY ARE WE HAVING A CONVERSATION
ABOUT LOOKS?
WE HAVE MOVED SO FAR PAST DISCUSSING REAL POLICY
IDEAS THAT NOW WE ARE HAVING CONVERSATIONS, AND COVERING NEWS
STORIES, ABOUT PEOPLE'S LOOKS.
DONALD TRUMP IS LITERALLY THE
UGLIEST MAN I'VE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE.
ROGER AILES.
FUCK, ROGER AILES.
ALL RIGHT, FINE.
THEY ARE ON PAR.
I DON'T
CARE IF HILLARY CLINTON IS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMAN, THE MOST
UNATTRACTIVE WOMAN, ALL THAT STUFF IS NOT RELEVANT TO ME.
SAME WITH DONALD TRUMP.
WHAT I CARE ABOUT, AND WHAT AMERICAN
VOTERS SHOULD CARE ABOUT, IS WHETHER OR NOT THESE POLITICIANS
WILL SERVE THEIR BEST INTEREST.
RIGHT NOW WE HAVE TWO CANDIDATES
WHO WILL NOT SERVE THEIR INTERESTS, PART OF THE REASON IS
BECAUSE AMERICANS ARE SHEEP WHO BUY INTO THESE NEW STORIES.
PART
OF THE REASON THEY ARE SHEEP IS BECAUSE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
COVERS STUPID STORIES LIKE THIS.
BY THE WAY, DAVID MUIR HAS THE BEST HAIR, HE IS VERY
GOOD-LOOKING.
I WAS WITH YOU UNTIL THE END.
HE HAS NICE HAIR, HE LOOKS
PRESIDENTIAL, ACTUALLY.
I THINK THERE IS A LITTLE BIT MORE TO
THIS BECAUSE I THINK HE IS SAYING, AND HE PROBABLY MEANS
PHYSICAL LOOK, BUT LET'S SAY HE MEANS, BECAUSE HE REFERENCED SHE
SAID HORRIBLE THINGS.
HERE'S THE PROBLEM WITH MODERN ELECTIONS IN
THE AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA, EVERYBODY, TO GET FOLLOWERS AND
HAVE THEIR MESSAGE BE SPREAD, NEEDS TO BE SNARKY AND KIND OF
A DICK ONLINE, SO TRUMP OBVIOUSLY IS THE BEST AT THAT,
BUT HILLARY CLINTON HAS PLENTY OF SNARKY KIND OF DICKISH TWEETS
THAT GO OUT.
I HAVEN'T SEEN GARY JOHNSON DO THAT, PARTIALLY
BECAUSE I DON'T FOLLOW HIM ON TWITTER, AND BERNIE SANDERS, ALL
OF HIS TWEETS ARE BASICALLY THE SAME THING, I WANT TO LIVE IN A
COUNTRY WHERE THE NEEDS OF THE MANY ARE WHAT WE PUSH FOR,
WHATEVER.
YOU ALMOST CAN'T BE PRESIDENTIAL ANYMORE BECAUSE PEOPLE
REWARD NONPRESIDENTIAL BEHAVIOR.
YOU THINK THERE WILL EVER BE A POINT WHERE POSTING THOSE
TYPES OF THINGS ON SOCIAL MEDIA WILL BE FROWNED UPON, AND
CANDIDATES WILL BE DISCOURAGED FROM DOING SO?
BECAUSE I AGREE
WITH YOU, THE TYPE OF SNARKY STUFF THAT YOU SEE ON TWITTER
RIGHT NOW AMONG THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, AND ALSO
CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES IN SOME CASES, DISGUSTS ME.
INCLUDING FOR ME, BY THE WAY.
BECAUSE WHEN YOU SIMPLY STATE
SOMETHING FACTUAL, WHO CARES?
IT DOESN'T DO WELL, BUT WHO CARES IF IT DOESN'T DO WELL ON
TWITTER?
TWITTER IS NOT THE END-ALL BE-ALL OF SOMEONE'S
CREDIBILITY OR LEGITIMACY.
I JUST THINK IT'S CRAZY THAT WE
ARE HAVING A DISCUSSION ABOUT THEIR LOOKS.
I GET IT, WE'VE
POKED FUN AT HOW DONALD TRUMP LOOKS, BUT HOW COULD YOU NOT?