Hi everyone, welcome to Difference Frames the World, a channel to view the world from
a different angle.
Please note we have opened a Telegram Channel and will put all our videos there. Viewers
must install the Telegram Application on their devices to access that channel.
Yesterday, we uploaded the second episode of the series: "let our fish tell how fishy
they are, " and we talked about the Taiwan Issue in that video.
Today, we want to discuss human rights in Xinjiang, debunking the accusations against
China of ill-treating Uyghurs in that autonomous area.
From yesterday onward, the US stopped importing products from Xinjiang unless US importers
can prove those products are not manufactured with forced labour.
We discussed Xinjiang's so-called forced labour issue one year ago when the west boycotted
Xinjiang Cotton in early 2021. Many western apparel companies are still suffering because
of their arrogance, like H and M, Nike, and Adidas, to name a few.
In late 2021, Sam's Club stores were also boycotted by Chinese consumers for their not
selling products from Xinjiang in China, making Walmart's business in China even worse.
Because of the alleged forced labour issue in Xinjiang, the US even invented a very innovative
diplomatic boycott of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, which few nations followed.
The United States claims it stands with countries and people worldwide against the poorly fabricated
genocide and crimes against humanity in the Xinjiang region, saying over a million people
have been placed in detention camps for their ethnic and religious identities.
Over the years, the US and its allies have been smearing China with the alleged "human
rights issues" in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Tibet, sanctioning many Chinese companies
and officials.
Earlier, UN High Commissioner for human rights Michelle Bachelet visited Xinjiang and had
a virtual meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. She immediately held a press conference
after the visit.
Bachelet did not mention Xinjiang as a "human rights issue" in the press conference statement
in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
It is worth mentioning Michelle Bachelet is already 70 years old, and she is not seeking
reelection as the high commissioner for human rights.
She clearly stated that the visit was not an investigation. Instead, it was a communication
between the UN human rights body and the Chinese government agencies at various levels.
Chinese media interpreted her statement as favouring China, as it did not criticize Xinjiang
for the so-called forced labour issue. On the contrary, Western media cherry-picked
some points from her statement, concluding that her visit was restricted. Chinese officials
accompanied her, so her conclusion did not count.
As we often say, everything has two sides, and we have to compare both to come out with
a balanced view, which we do every day.
Her visit to China lasted only several days, and she clearly stated it was not an investigation
but a high-level contact.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was unhappy with her statement and publicly expressed
his disapproval.
Neither European nor American diplomats are willing to visit Xinjiang by themselves, seeing
what has happened there. We advise related government agencies in China to sue western
media for spreading malicious rumours about the so-called Xinjiang forced labour instead
of proving China's innocence to the world.
What is the point of wasting their time on meaningless explanations to some people who
pretend to be deaf and blind?
The alleged human rights issue has long been weaponized. From Tian An Men Square Protest
to Hong Kong Riot, China has fallen victim to the stigmatization for decades.
In previous videos, we discussed Xinjiang's anti-terrorism achievement and western nations'
Afghanistan war, highlighting the vast Difference.
Every year, Xinjiang attracts around 200 million visitors, eight times its population. If Xinjiang
has human rights issues, why are so many people willing to go there?
If you want to choose Iraq, Syria or Libya over Xinjiang as the destination for your
next tour, please leave your comments below.
Xinjiang-related issues are not about human rights but about fighting violence, terrorism
and separatism. According to the figures available, several thousand incidents of violent and
terrorist attacks took place in Xinjiang, killing many innocent people and hundreds
of police officers and causing immeasurable property damage. Ask your Chinese friends
if they wanted to visit the region between 19 90 and 20 16, which was full of violence
and terror.
In response to such threats, Xinjiang has acted firmly to fight terrorism and extremism
by following the law. Many supporting measures have been taken, like improving people's livelihoods,
raising public awareness about the law, and offering help through vocational education
and training centers. The trend of frequent terrorist activities has thus been effectively
curbed.
There has been no violent act of terrorism in Xinjiang for five consecutive years after
20 17.
The region has enjoyed security, social stability and quick development.
As we stated in many videos, "Genocide" in Xinjiang is a complete "lie of the century.
" Over the past 60 years, the Uyghur population has increased from around 2 million to about
12 million, and their average life expectancy has grown from 30 to 75 years. It is not
rare to find aged Uyghur people in the region nowadays, which was unbelievable several decades
ago.
The region has made unprecedented progress in delivering economic and social development
and improving people's living standards. Remarkable achievements have been made in eliminating
extreme poverty, making it a thing of the past in Xinjiang.
All ethnic groups, regardless of their populations, have equal legal status and enjoy the freedom
of religious belief and various rights by law, including participating in managing
state affairs, receiving education, using their languages, and preserving their traditional
culture.
In recent years, over 2,000 people from more than 100 countries, including experts,
scholars, journalists, diplomats and religious figures, have visited Xinjiang, witnessing
the unity, harmony and happiness of people of all ethnic groups in that Chinese province.
Interestingly, no Muslim nations have criticized China for ill-treating Uyghurs and other Muslims
in Xinjiang. Still, the United States, which banned Muslims under the Trump Administration,
has been exciting the so-called genocide in Xinjiang.
And Canada, an ally of the US, acted as a pioneer in smearing China despite its stains
of murdering thousands of indigenous kids in its boarding schools all over the country.
The notorious anti-China German scholar Adrian Zenz invented the genocide in Xinjiang based
on the historic facts in Germany during world war two. We published a video about this so-called
scholar in early 2021, and today, we do not want to contaminate viewers' ears with his
shady name.
The false claim about "millions of Uyghurs detained" in education and training centers
was initiated and spread by "Chinese Human Rights Defenders, " a Non-government organization
supported by a government everyone knows. Based on interviews with eight Uyghurs and
a rough estimation, the organization concluded that at least 10 percent of the 20 million
people in Xinjiang are detained in "reeducation camps. "
The education and training centers in Xinjiang have proved to be a successful exploration
of preventative counter-terrorism and deradicalization, consistent with the principle and spirit of
counter-terrorism resolutions, including the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism
Strategy and the United Nations Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism.
The US and some other Western countries have been making an issue of human rights
in Xinjiang, disregarding the fundamental reality of human rights protection and development
there. It has become a means for them to achieve their strategic objective of using Xinjiang as a pretext to
contain China.
Lawrence Wilkerson, a retired US Army Colonel and chief of staff to former Secretary of State
Colin Powell, said publicly in August, 20 18, that one of the three-fold purposes
of the US military's presence in Afghanistan is the containment of China. "If the CIA would
want to destabilize China, that would be the best way to do it. To ferment an unrest, and
join with those Uyghurs in pushing Beijing from internal places rather than external".
Colin Powell asserted Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when he was the Secretary
of State and helped initiate the Iraqi war. He contracted Covid 19 and died in the so-called
most democratic country in the universe.
Antony Blinken is not as fortunate as Colin Powell, as China possesses weapons of mass
destruction. China even brags about them publicly, which worries the US military and the White
House day and night.
It is not easy for the US to conquer China without ruining its mainland territory in
North America. What else can Blinken do except badmouthing China's anti-terrorism campaigns
in Xinjiang?
If you can find something for him to do, please comment below to inspire other viewers with
your brilliance.
This video is part 3 of the series "Let our fish tell how fishy they are, " which will
consist of 22 videos. Subscribe to our channel for the coming 19 videos about America's other
accusations against China.
Thank you so much for your continuous support. Your precious time with us is highly appreciated.
We do our work as a mission, a cause; please help us grow and reach more extensive audiences
by forwarding our content to as many people as possible.
We publish videos daily and post long videos on topics viewers are interested in once or
twice a week. If you have not subscribed to our channel
or turned on the notification bell, please do it now, so you will not miss our new content
daily. Please use the PayPal or Patreon link below,
or scan the QR codes to support us.