former under is uh... former of professor of president all bombing you
was uh... professor visit harvard law school and he's come out of the video
now worry says dole both robot
it's not a stressor on risk a server or a public in quite the contrary he's a
progressive
i think said that president bomb is doing great damage to the press of cost
first he starts by explaining what's wrong with both parties but specifically
the repulse
neither of the two major political part
offers the country with it
the republican party imagine
that if the only government became
left costly and restricted
with lower taxes and fewer regulations
economic growth would make up for inequality
if this party had its way
inequality would become even greater
than it is now
and threatened freedom and prosperity
even more than did now dot
so houston definitely nala republic side he's not trying to help them
he says they would make a gum inequality and everything else the country and
prosperity much worse that was hit by the democratic party here's were
disinterest
the democratic party proposes
no new direct
it's idea
if the port
human face
on the program of its adversary
to implement
their program
with the humanizing discount
give the bond market's what they want
bail out the recollections
so long as they are also
used fiscal and monetary stimulus
to make up for the absence
of mt consequential broadway
of economic and educational opportunity
sweetened the pill
of disempowered
with a touch of tax fairness
even though would be a fact
other any such tax reform
is sure to be models
this is less a project
than it is shane abdication
sees basically saying mirror trojan horse
they are you at human face to like all look at us helping view album with the
event
touch of tax fairness but in reality
they do with the rich one and he's right about the bond market's because whenever
a president comes in a brooklyn has talked about the cecil the bond market's
my god they'll drive up our deficits even more it is a link resort interest
rates we won't be able to pay until you got to do whatever they want and what do
they want
chung without it turns out they want tax cuts for the reg
the same people who are times have
money in the bond markets
and they decide that you should do it by gutting the middle class
so he says that is horrible for the democrats to go on and play that same
game
but try to display
ten percent better
so now under president omar here's a hundred etc
president obama
must be defeated
in the coming election
he has failed to advance the progressive cause
the united states
he had spent trillions of dollars
to rescue the monied interests
workers and homeowners
for their own devices
he had subordinate
the broadening of economic and educational opportunities
through the important but secondary if u
of access to health care
in the mistaken belief
that you would be spared the fight
he has this guides to surrender
with an empty appealed to tax dot
he had delivered
the politics of democracy
to the rule of money
he has reduced justice to charity
his policy its financial confidence
and food stamps
he has evoked
a politics of hand-hold
but no one changes the world
without a struggle
unless he has defeated
there cannot be a contact
for the reorientation of the democratic
as the vehicle
of a progressive alternative
in the country
now he says he has the sky is his surrender
with talks of compromises satara
i mean is a powerful words i think that they're largely right
he says that he is seriously surrendered our democracy to the rule of money
he's almost
definitely right about that
president all bomb is not really gone for any systematic change along those
lines
and webber has more money wins almost every instance and he says look you can
do this with hand-holding view what we'll change is what you promised
it takes a struggle to do it any are struggling
you give up everytime there's any kind of flight
he certainly right about that
the last part of it is interesting part
he says we should do
you know real real inflation of the democratic party if you don't do that
if you elect president obama again they're not going to do some massive
change in the democratic party they're not going to become progressive
letting them go along with the same system
well he's
almost certainly right about that too but does that mean you should vote
against president all bomber because of course the consequences an alternate are
horrible
well that's what the
address is finally here
there will be etc off
for his defeat
in judicial and administrative
of military adventurism however
under the rule
off his opponent
will be no greater
than it would be
under him
only a political reversal
channels i love the voice
democratic processes
just speak once again
in american life
it's speech
is always dangerous
its silence
is always fatal
find here is right here in this agreement with it because fighting the
supreme court of course is massively important he agrees with that
and how far we go down this rabbit hole of the rule of money
this partly depend on the supreme court
uh... uses military adventure some uh...
adventurism under o bomb a
has been horrible well that's a largely true except
it would be seen everywhere worse under the route that republicans
because it appears that every top foreign policy adviser to mit romney
scale late to go to war the ron
and that's another level of disaster for the country
and then finally he's talked about a democratic prophecy
but that's right he's actually most wrong
because the democrats are never going to ride to the rescue even a president mama
loses
andromeda takes us to another economic collapse of the things that still
another middle eastern war and all the things are horrible the lesson of the
democratic party will learn events
well then we should be more like that
that's the lesson they always ler
because that's the lesson they get pay to learn
okay
so there is no democratic answer only answer
comes from the people
and it doesn't have to do with this election whether obama wins are not it
has to do with revolution against the system
a political revolution not one will force
against this rebel against the system
that has the democrats will probably take money from the same people
from the richest people in the country so i understand ninety percent of were
professor onerous coming from but in the end
this election is actually fairly irrelevant because that system more
design either way
we have to extract the heart of it
if you think president obama's gonna come the rescue your million percent
wrong
if you think that uh... the democratic party is gonna come the rescue if
president obama loses
you're still a million for several
no we have to start it
you know obviously we think we do it through constitutional moment
we uh... talk all about that at wolfpack could find out more twelve dash back dot
com
bob but no matter how you do it and no matter if you
which constitutional movement it is it's gotta be through that
it's not gonna be through the useless democratic party
part laura x real quick
yeah i was just
the one thing that i have to take away happened it was uh...
beyond a mover on pretty receptive to the message that he has blow my i guess
my biggest fears i feel like we live in a bit of a
we live in a new time in the sense that there is so such advanced a surveillance
equipment
and military equipment as far as suppressing crowds keeping people and
check that
ans i would just be afraid that you'd sort of take you know 'cause we talked
about this one wouldn't ron paul was bigger in the in the primary in on
that if you are all lower for about four years of romney or something
do you really allow
b
this the state and some and into place the structure
that then
ultimately to actually substance of we change it
is gonna requirement people dying
bob because
you would have to you'd have to struggle in that sort of sense bomb and there's
such advanced you know uh... sort of
weapons and everything on the other side that i don't know that now have a
peaceful alternative look
there's two other reasons luke is makes a good point
and there's two other reasons this so why you shouldn't for president while in
a lose
even though
as i tell you the election in overall is not the answer
but never wanted
uh... is
you don't win by losing okay it's a bass reggie to say hey you know what if we
lose a windfall for class
and then maybe we'll get to the results no
u_n_ by winning
two or three or whatever were on finally
if there is a people's movement
and we or get some headway because the showman in itself
mit romney will use uh...
the office of the presidency
to try to fight u_n_ destroy you every step of the way
whereas president bomber such a politician
that if he feels like you've got enough momentum and you're about to win
and so funny you tooth and nail will switch sides ago
i was with you all along that's what i meant by change
you see what i'm saying
so that is this small shred of hope the ever-present no bomber
that he's greasy enough as a politician
that it'll last moment
hill i hope you are a little bit rather than trying to hurt you
and pretend that he was on your side
so any you know what
as a much better hope anyhow with mitt romney who's just as greasy
buddies so
karach
that he wouldn't have run
ever turn on the monied interests
and the powerful people in this country