The week of Valentine's Day 2021, the temperature dropped below zero.
Nobody could remember it being this cold for this long.
This was Texas, not Siberia.
But Texas is the energy state. There was nothing to fear. Just go home,
turn on the heat, and hunker down.
That's how it should have gone.
Instead, over five days, four million Texans lost power during what turned
out to be the coldest winter storm in a half a century. Hundreds died,
including an 11-year-old boy who froze to death in his sleep.
The state's electric grid operator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas,
ERCOT, later reported the state was just four minutes away from total grid collapse.
The media was quick to blame the state government
for not being fully prepared and not acting fast enough.
This may be true, but ERCOT's mistakes were symptoms, not the cause, of the problem.
The real cause is decades of misguided policies that have
left the Lone Star state with an unreliable energy infrastructure.
It's a cautionary tale that the rest of the country needs to learn from.
From 2010 to 2020, the population of Texas increased by 4 million people,
and the state's economy grew by 35%. But while all this growth was happening,
the state's reliable energy capacity was actually shrinking.
Meanwhile, its unreliable energy capacity was surging. In fact, it almost tripled.
Let's break this down.
Reliable energy is fossil fuels—coal and natural gas—and nuclear. These fuels produce
a near-constant flow of electricity. Unreliable, or variable energy, is renewable energy—wind and
solar. They're unreliable because they depend on the whims of Mother Nature.
In 2020, Texans got 25% of their energy from renewables. During the February storm,
however, that fell to 8%, at one point reaching a deadly low of just 1.5%.
The reason? Renewable energy only works when the weather cooperates,
but it's useless when it doesn't—like when it conjures up a giant snowstorm.
Solar panels don't capture sunlight and wind turbines don't spin when covered in snow and ice.
Given renewables' unreliability, how is it that Texas, of all places, became so dependent on them?
That story begins in 1999, when Texas politicians on the left and the right fell in love with the
idea that they could turn the state into a green energy powerhouse. It sounded like a great idea
at the time: Instead of passing any new mandates, they would do it by offering massive subsidies,
marketed as "incentives," to produce wind and solar power. This ended up working
out great for the wind and solar companies, but not so great for reliable energy providers.
To illustrate this, imagine that you own a restaurant. One day you learn that your competitor
down the street is getting government support. He gets so much help that, instead of charging
his customers, he can pay them to eat his food. Not surprisingly, your customers abandon your
restaurant for his. Your competitor prospers off the taxpayers' backs while your business withers.
Let's apply this analogy to the real world of renewable energy.
Wind and solar get so much in subsidies they're guaranteed a profit.
And unlike fossil fuel producers, they're not even required to provide reliable power.
It's no wonder fossil fuel plants are closing, and nuclear plants are not being built.
The wind and solar companies are protected from the laws of supply and demand.
They can't lose, and the fossil fuel plants
can't compete. That's how out of whack the Texas electricity market has become.
Since 2006, the state has subsidized renewable energy to the tune of $19 billion.
All of this came right out of Texans' wallets, courtesy of ever-increasing electric bills
and rising property taxes. And what does Texas have to show for it?
An electric grid that failed when Texans needed it most.
Unfortunately, this scenario is playing out across America.
Over the past decade, the federal government has spent over $230 billion on energy subsidies,
and that doesn't even include subsidies the states give away.
It's true that Uncle Sam also grants favors to fossil fuel companies.
Renewable energy advocates love to point this out, but here's what they neglect to mention:
compared to fossil fuel companies, for every unit of electricity generated,
Washington subsidizes wind 17 times and solar 75 times more.
Yet, despite all this aid, renewables provide just 4 percent of the country's total energy supply.
The verdict is in: renewable energy is expensive and unreliable. And if
it can render America's leading power producer powerless, it can do the same to your state.
Government meddling got us into this mess. It's time for politicians to step aside
and let the free market get us out of it.
I'm Jason Isaac from the Texas Public Policy Foundation, for Prager University.