a forty six-year-old man in canada has been charged with defamatory libel
because he took some of the photos of his girlfriend had sent in which we nude
photos are sexually explicit photos and after they broke up he started sending
them to her friends family
and employers
so the reason i mean the story of his because it's fascinating you know when
you hear about the slide in the united states you know couple will break up in
on the side of the boyfriend will search you know uploading that
homemade porn film to like youporn dot com and it's just kind of become like an
accepted thing read a lot of times it's like well the woman she had taken the
naked picture to begin with which i agree high i will never take a naked
picture for that reason alone like that's just
my biggest fear right it's gonna end up on the internet
uh... so
it's interesting because this is never happened before and i'm sure it happens
that's an unfair statement i'm sure it might have happened in other isolated
cases but for the most part people just kind of pretend like it's not a big deal
this case he could save us he could serve two years in prison
it's because of the differences between the laws in camden the laws here yasir
defamation libel and all that
uh... so it is interesting that that there are laws even allowed for that
sort of thing
um... that i'm not from canada i know we have quite a few came yours maybe folsom
or if this does actually happen more often and i think but
lupica put myself in trouble and and i wanna have a discussion with you about
that the fact that he could potentially go to jail for two years and that's very
interesting let's get to that in the second because you did touch on
something that's important you know of course canadian laws differ from u_s_
laws
so there definitely definition an anti defended reliable it could be very
different from ours
so why don't we deal with their definition of defamatory libelous is and
then you can understand why they have decided to add that he might serve some
time in prison for this uh... its matter published without lawful justification
or excuse that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing
them to hatred
or ridicule or that is designed to insult the person all or concerning whom
it is published
so i feel as though this that particular crime you know fits that definition
exactly
so go ahead your question is do i think he should serve two years in prison for
this file
maybe look on the
probable myself in trouble because as we we've talked about nude photos both on
this program to achieve a person chi
uh... i i understand that as a man i'm going to feel a bit differently like ait
if they could photos of myself ralph there i wouldn't be obsolete devastated
abroad be old embarrassed unless like the lady was good mangoes or something
like that but it wouldn't be the end of my life
movement so but says it's different for women it's particularly different for
women in the media library
but there are lots of actresses and having photos of them out there and date
the seem to be doing okay i think what we did the photo her career is over
impose a very
different type of career its latest individuals to take pictures shows to do
that whereas in this case she did not totally immersed in that but
one of the things actually did you see bother me a little bit when i was just a
few were realtor sexually and not by what you do your for number of years
this
he doesn't talk about crime and then it's okay for how many years to get
and sometimes the sentences you guys are
bananas labor
five years for doing something where you live here is that uh... you know what
twelve years in prison is like
seems to me a little bit no thankfully i don't buy a magic its
devastating
hired for air in terms of your tickets but the devastating idea yet summit two
years in prison she's not
physically harm children take a look because
i'd hate the gap
the fact intended to not only our friends or family as well an absolutely
heiress employers i fully understand if you're friends with that guy who did
everything friendship i just thought on this year's
okay
i feel uncomfortable commenting on how much time prison time he should serve
two years does sound excess very excessive
a bit i don't know what the right answer is and you're right about the
conversations we used to have on the show about waco have any issues if we
don't know right when i experts and i feel that i don't know what kind of
punishment will fit this crime
i do know that there should be a punishment immediate makes more sense
for him to pay some sort of you know patients are fine here
uh... i'd be much more comfortable with that as opposed to three people in
prison for doing this
i do like
sending a message to people that says look you can't do this just because an
broke up with your girlfriend and you dislike hurt now because it does damage
someone's reputation so you brought up the question of you know actor actress
who does a naked pictures well that's completely different because eight did
you make that decision and also be dylan new doctor acting lincoln car dashing
seem a little clipper that helped a fair right but in the case of a school
teacher for instance i don't know what this particular woman does for of her
career in fact they didn't even identify her abut
if you're n annette amusing kerr
how does naked pictures of yourself online is
gonna ruin your credibility
if it's going yes people are they did judge ito and it's unfortunate because
we freak out about sex and we freak out about nudity and i wish it wasn't that
way but it has real consequences for women who want to be professionals
so that's the reason why this is a big problem and also dot it should be
concerned about it too because
i will never send anyway naked picture of myself right and it's because a
douche bags like this is cecil all you guys out there should be absent this
guide because it's definitely deterring women from sending you need photos