UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY CHAIR: I now give the floor to the distinguished representative
of the United States to introduce Draft Amendment (A/ES-10/L.24).
AMBASSADOR HALEY: Good afternoon.
There are many terrible things happening in the world today.
Many things that demand our urgent attention.
As we speak, protests are taking place in Nicaragua.
Over 146 peaceful Nicaraguans have been killed by their own government in the past two months.
But we are not talking about Nicaragua today.
The people of Iran have been protesting their government for months.
Thousands of peaceful Iranian protestors have been arrested.
Over 25 are dead.
But we’re not talking about Iran either.
The world’s worst humanitarian crisis is going on right now in Yemen.
Millions are at risk for starvation.
In Burma, almost a million innocent people have been driven from their homes
in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.
But we’re not talking about Yemen or Burma.
Instead, today the General Assembly is devoting its valuable time to the situation in Gaza.
Gaza is an important international matter.
But what makes it different and more urgent than conflicts in Nicaragua, Iran, Yemen,
Burma, or many other desperate places?
Because we haven’t gathered here to discuss any of those urgent issues.
The United States would welcome that.
What makes Gaza different for some is that attacking Israel is their favorite political sport.
That’s why we’re here today.
The nature of this resolution clearly demonstrates that politics is driving the day.
It is totally one-sided.
It makes not one mention of Hamas, who routinely initiates violence in Gaza.
Such one-sided resolutions at the UN do nothing to advance peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
Everyone recognizes that.
But advancing peace is not the goal of this resolution.
I suspect even my Turkish friends know the passage of this resolution won’t change anything,
but that it looks good for the people back home to think they’re doing something.
That is pure politics.
In fact, this resolution makes peace less possible.
It feeds a narrative to the desperate people of Gaza that their leaders are not responsible
for their predicament.
It stokes hatred.
It sacrifices honesty, accuracy, compromise, and reconciliation in favor of the advancement
of a narrow political agenda.
If we were being honest, we would acknowledge that there are no perfect actors
on either side of this conflict.
But it does no one any good to pretend that all blame lies on one side.
I wish everyone supporting this one sided resolution would put as much energy into encouraging
President Abbas to come to the negotiating table, as you do to falsely imply to your
people back home that you’re doing something.
Israel withdrew completely from Gaza in 2005.
Hamas has been the de facto government in Gaza since 2007.
This strip of land along the Mediterranean coast has enormous potential.
And yet, after 11 years of Hamas rule, Gaza has electricity for only a few hours a day.
It has enormous unemployment and poverty.
It is a haven for terrorist activity.
At what point will the UN actually hold accountable those who are in charge of Gaza
and running it into the ground?
Instead, this resolution holds Hamas completely unaccountable for most of the recent unrest.
It blames everything on Israel.
But the facts tell a different story.
It is Hamas and its allies that have fired over a hundred rockets into Israel in the
past month, hoping to cause death to as many civilians and as much destruction as possible.
It is Hamas that has used Palestinian civilians as human shields at the boundary fence,
seeking to incite violence and overrun the border.
It is Hamas that refuses to cooperate with the Palestinian Authority to unite
in the pursuit of peace.
It is Hamas that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel within any borders.
And yet the resolution before us not only fails to blame Hamas for these actions,
it fails to even mention Hamas.
This is the dangerous, counter-productive decision the General Assembly is about to take.
But there is still a chance for this body to try and right this wrong.
We still have the opportunity to salvage something honest from this discussion.
The United States is offering an amendment that provides a small step
in the direction of balance.
Our amendment rightly condemns Hamas’s indiscriminate firing of rockets into Israeli civilian communities.
It accurately condemns the diversion of aid and resources from civilian needs into military
infrastructure, including terror tunnels used to attack Israeli citizens.
It justly expresses our grave concerns about damage done to border crossings that are hindering
the delivery of desperately needed food and fuel to the people of Gaza.
This is a modest amendment that reflects the minimum truth of what is going on in Gaza.
It is the least that any self-respecting international organization or nation can do for the cause of peace.
To those who are unsure about how to vote, I ask, what part of our amendment is objectionable?
Is it objectionable to condemn Hamas for firing the rockets at civilians?
Is it objectionable to condemn the diversion of resources from civilians to military uses?
Or is it objectionable to express concern about the destruction of border crossings
that deliver life-saving supplies?
Today’s choice for the General Assembly is simple.
It is the choice between using our time here to advance peace and security,
or using it to stoke hatred and conflict.
This vote will tell us much about which countries are serious about accuracy and reconciliation
and which countries are bound by their political agendas.
For the sake of peace, and for the sake of this institution, I urge my colleagues
to support the United States’ amendment.
Thank you.
UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY CHAIR: I thank the distinguished representative of the United States.