Now, you might ask how did things get this way?
How did it come to a point in our culture where people are so radically confused about this issue?
Where even now some of you you think homosexual acts are wrong, but you feel bad about it.
Like you think it is wrong, but you secretly feel like you are doing something wrong even by thinking it is wrong.
How did that happen? Well, in one recent Netflix
expose about the gay rights movement. They interviewed one particular leader.
I cannot remember his name out the top of my head.
But, he talks about how they got
the culture to change
on this issue of homosexuality. Because it has been a total cultural flip in a very short period of time.
And his statement is
we sold it like cereal.
We used advertising, we use pictures, we use propaganda and we have sold it
just the same way they sell like Kellogg's cereal.
And, I put like a you know sports figure on the cover or whatever that is how we did it.
There is actually a book from the 90's.
It is called after the ball. How America will conquer its fear and hatred of gays in the 90's.
This book I would have bought it, but it was over $300 on Amazon.
Because it is a very, it is quite a collectible book for obvious reasons.
What it does is it outlines a three-step plan to change American public opinion.
Using tactics of manipulation and advertising primarily in the media.
What they do is that their three steps are: one desensitize,
two jamming and three conversion.
So, the first step desensitize. They liken the people's disapproval of homosexual behavior as
like having a bad smell in the room. Yes, not that homosexual behavior smells bad, that is not their point.
They are total you know pro gay advocates. What they are saying here is what we will do is
we will desensitize them by constantly exposing them to homosexual
activities. That they will just be so inundated by it that eventually
they will just mellow out, and it will not bother them anymore.
That will be the concept. So, let me quote:
Just like a smell after a while as it goes away.
Which some of you are very grateful that that happens because of your kids.
So, their goal
and I quote from this book is: "We can extract the following principle for our campaign to desensitize straights to gays and gayness,
inundate them in a continuous flood of gay related advertising.
Presenting in the least offensive fashion possible.
Presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If straights cannot shut off the shower
they may at least eventually get used to being wet."
So, that will simply get accustomed to it. There will be a gay character in every movie.
There will be gay references frequently and it will not in be not in a derogatory fashion,
but just kind of like in a accepted style.
And so, hopefully they will be desensitized. But, then they go on to say
but that is not enough of a goal the next step is jamming. What they call jamming?
And, this has to do with making anyone who is opposed to homoerotic behavior into a bad guy.
The same way that Hollywood makes bad guys.
I think a good illustration of this is star wars. Any Star Wars fans anybody is Star Wars fan in here?
I am a star wars fan, but I have to admit Luke Skywalker
is a sniveling lousy hero, he is a constant complainer.
I mean like his most common. I think quote in the movie is him doing something like:
meah, meah! It is just, he is a crybaby and he is like: Oh, I was going to go do this. He is..
there is nothing to look at this guy and enjoy, you know.
I think in one movie he comes off, when he is rescuing Han, you know from the
carbon-freeze thing he went through. He comes off pretty cool for like 10 minutes
and then he is back to just being a like a whiny, like no that is impossible. You know that kind of thing.
Well, because his hand got cut off.
Well, Hollywood though, what did they do?
How did they make you cheer for Luke Skywalker?
Well, the opening scene of Darth Vader is him like forced choking some guy to death for making a mistake.
So, by default Luke is the hero.
We do, we see this all the time. The introduction to above a bad guy in a movie is typically them
overreacting and killing one of their own, you know or something and it is like: oh! now
I know who the bad guy is. And, no matter how bad the other guy is by default he is the good guy.
You know, when they sell us on certain things.
Well, what they are going to do with the strategy of jamming is to over exaggerate.
and vilify every representation of
anyone of anybody Who disagrees with homosexual behavior.
To make them all look like villains like bad guys. Let me read to you from the book it says:
The goal is this: "Propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homo hating bigots
as crude loudmouths and blank holes, who are not Christian?
So, that just to pick them all is in a really bad way. In fact,
it is even in the text, that all, everyone who disagrees with us is a
is a homophobic and a homo hating bigot.
They are not just people who think it is a sin.
It can show them being criticized,
hated and shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homo hatred -
suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause."
It can, in short, link homo hating bigotry with all sorts of attributes the bigot would be a shame to possess
and with social consequences he would find unpleasant and scary...
our effect is achieved without reference to facts logic or proof.
If not, it is not necessary that you have reasons to believe this or not,
it is just that every movie you can think of where there is a prominent
gay character in the film that whoever is against their gay act is just like you would not want to be that guy.
You would not want to be this guy.
The same effect I think happens in modern representations of Christians in films.
They are all nutty, they are all weird, they are all wacko
and yet the vast majority of Christians are not like this. And, yet um
except well Fred is a little bit.
Now yeah, Steve is not here, I pick on him.
Now, that is the second goal, jamming. So, the goal of Jamming is it declares is so that
what happens is when someone sees a gay person and then they think: oh! what they do is wrong.
They project on themselves the image of the villain of the films and media and movies and
music that they have heard. So, that they feel really bad about it, and they are like:
Oh, I do not want to feel this way.
So, then they approve it of it that they might then feel better about themselves.
It is brainwashing.
The third tactic is conversion.
This is the goal and conversion is not to just get you to accept to the behavior
that was the first one, desensitized. Not to jamming to stop the
opposition of behaviors to just stop it, but rather conversion is to get all non gays
to like gays and to directly approve of it.
So, let me quote from the book again.
We mean conversion of the average American's emotions mind, and will through a plan
psychological attack in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.
In conversion the bigot, who holds a very negative
stereotypical picture, is
repeatedly exposed to literal picture label pairs, in magazines,"
So there is a picture with label.
"and on billboards and TV of gay
-explicitly labeled as such!-
who not only do not look like his picture of a homosexual,
but are carefully selected to look either like the bigot and his friends,
or like any of his other stereotypes of all-right guys-
the kind of people he already likes and admires."
So, that the goal here is to associate them with with a positive image, so that that there is
an attitude of acceptance and embracing.
Now, I am not saying here, that there is this vast conspiracy and everyone is involved
and they are all trying to brainwash you.
But, what I am saying is, these are proven selling tactics.
Used by things like you know you associate, you know, smoking with cowboys.
And then more people smoke because that makes them feel like a cowboy, kind of.
You know, and like: yeah! when you smoke without the filter man, then it is like cowboy style.
You know you are more like a cowboy.
You know, that this is the kind of thing that happens and if we just look at our lives we go.
This is really what we have seen.
This is what we have seen, whether they done it deliberately or not or any doubt,
I do not even care. I am not really into conspiracies. I feel like they are a big waste of time.
But, I want to observe
there is something here.
The vilification of non,
non gay approving people is
consistent in our culture to the point,
where you feel like you have to apologize for saying that you think homosexuality,
homosexual behavior is a sin.
What do you think about gay people? Do you think it is a sin?
Well yeah, I think it is a sin.
But, now let me spend like 10 minutes backpedaling so that you do not think that
I am a bad person. Because now I feel like a bad person you think I am a bad person and
so we spend the rest of our time just trying to not feel bad, when it is like if someone goes well,
how about incest? Do you think incest is a sin?
Well yes, I think incest is a sin. I do not feel like I have to qualify that, do I?
You incest-o-phobe! you bigot!
It does not work, does not work on that one, does it?
It only works on homophobe. I can be accused of homophobia even if I have no ounce of homophobia in my life.
That can easily be done.