NATIVITY SCENE PUBLICLY VIOLATED
CHURCH AND STATE.
THEY MOVED IT ACROSS FROM THE
PARK.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS.
THIS IS NIGHT COURT TIME.
AND WE'RE HERE FROM THE FREEDOM
FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION.
MANY WANT TO SEE IT IN THE PARK.
>> THE TOWN HAS DECIDE CAN
>> THE TOWN HAS DECIDE CA
>> THE TOWN HAS DECIDED A
>> THE TOWN HAS DECIDED TH
>> THE TOWN HAS DECIDED THEY
WHY WOULD IT BE A PROBLEM ON
GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
>> IT VIOLATES THE FIRST
RELIGIOUS.
>> YOU KNOW THIS IS PART OF A
TROUBLE.
>> THAT'S WHAT I RELY ON.
THEY WANTED TO AVOID LITIGATION.
THAT'S WHY THEY MOVED IT.
THEY NEEDED TO MAKE THIS A
BROADER HOLIDAY SCENE AS OPPOSED
TO A NATIVITY SEEN.
THEY NEED TO BRING IN SANTA
CLAUS AND ALL OF THAT, IF THEY
DID THAT, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE
LITIGATED AND SPENT THE MONEY ON
ATTORNEYS.
>> IF THEY BRING IN SANTA CLAUS
AND CHRISTMAS TREES WHICH IS
THREATEN THEM?
REINDEER
REINDEER C LAUS, IT IS NOT AN
ISSUE.
THE SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT IS
SLICK.
THESE ARE DEPENDENT.
YOU LOOK AT REASONABLE PERSON
CHRISTIANS
CHRISTIAN
CHRISTIANS.
YOU GOT TO BE CLEAR.
IF YOU ADD SANTA CLAUS AND A
MENORAH AND A TRADITION, THAT
WOULD BE OKAY.
I WILL GET FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS
SEGMENT.
PEOPLE GET THE OPINION THAT THIS
IS ABOUT BIRTH OF CHRIST.
CHRISTMAS.
>> NO QUESTION.
THAT'S NOT AN DEFENSE.
IT IS CLEAR THAT A PUBLIC
FACILITY OR BROUGHT CANNOT
ADVERTISE.
THEY HAD A PROMOTION FROM AN
ATHEIST GROUP.