>>THE FCC HAS ALREADY DECIDED TO ROLL BACK REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
UNDER LAWS PERTAINING TO NET NEUTRALITY.
AJIT PAI, THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE FCC, HAS BEEN OPEN AND TRANSPARENT ABOUT THE
FACT THAT HE DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THAT NEUTRALITY, SO HERE IS WHAT
RECENTLY HAPPENED --
>>AGAIN, THAT REPORTING IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT NET
NEUTRALITY IS TAKING PLACE AND THAT INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS
AREN'T SPEEDING UP THE INTERNET SPEED OF SOME WEBSITES WELL
SLOWING DOWN THE SPEEDS OF OTHERS.
SO THIS WILL ACTUALLY
HAVE THE BIGGEST IMPACT ON RURAL AREAS IN THE UNITED STATES,
BECAUSE THAT IS TYPICALLY WHERE SMALLER INTERNET SERVICE
PROVIDERS EXIST.
NOW --
>>LOOK, IF YOU JUST HEARD THEIR VERSION OF THE STORY, LOOK, WE
WANT TO HELP THOSE RURAL AREAS AND IF YOU PUT TOO MUCH
REGULATION ON THESE POOR, TINY INTERNET COMPANIES THAT ARE
PROVIDING THE INTERNET THERE THAT THEY WON'T HAVE ANY
INTERNET, THAT'S WHY WE CARE ABOUT THEM.
NOW WHEN YOU LOOK AT
THE REAL FACTS, FIRST OF ALL THESE ARE NOT SMALL COMPANIES.
IT IS FOR 250,000 OR FEWER SUBSCRIPTIONS IN A CERTAIN AREA,
BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE COMPANY IS SMALL.
MOST OF THE
COMPANIES PROVIDING THAT SERVICE ARE MULTIBILLION-DOLLAR
COMPANIES.
SO THIS WHOLE, I'M PROTECTING SMALL BUSINESSES,
GOLLY, THERE IS NO SUCH THING.
SECOND OF ALL, THEY SAY I CARE
SO MUCH ABOUT RURAL AMERICA -- BUT IF YOU ARE LOW INCOME, I
JUST EXEMPTED ALL THE RICH COMPANIES FROM HAVING TO PROVIDE
YOU INTERNET, I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU AT ALL, I'M JUST TRYING TO
LOOSEN THE RULES.
AND WHEN WE GO TO THAT POINT IT'S THE MOST
IMPORTANT ONE AT ALL, BECAUSE I'M READING THIS ARTICLE, I KNOW
THESE GUYS AND THEIR TRICKS, I THOUGHT TO MYSELF, THIS IS JUST
THE BEGINNING.
IF THEY LEFT IT AT THIS -- THEY NEVER LEAVE IT
AT ANYTHING -- IT WOULD STILL BE WRONG, IT'S WRONG FOR RURAL
AMERICA, THEY CAN SLOW DOWN WEBSITES IN THIS AREAS AND WE
WOULDN'T KNOW BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TRANSPARENCY, BUT THEY
WON'T LEAVE IT AT THAT.
AND OF COURSE BY THE END EXPLAIN THIS
IS JUST THE BEGINNING, AND ONE OF THE REPUBLICANS SAID IF IT'S
GOOD FOR SMALL COMPANIES IT'S PROBABLY GOOD FOR BIG COMPANIES
TOO, SO I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD HAVE ANY TRANSPARENCY.
>>LET ME GIVE YOU THE PERSON WHO SAID THAT AND WHAT HE SAID --
>>IF THERE IS NO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU HAVE NO
IDEA WHAT THE INTERNET PROVIDERS ARE DOING, AND YES THEY COULD
SLOW DOWN ANY COMPANY'S WEBSITE THAT DOESN'T GIVE THEM THE
RANSOM.
OR IF THEY DON'T LIKE THEIR POLITICS.
YOU'RE AGAINST
MERGERS OF GIANT MEDIA COMPANIES?
LOOK AT THAT, YOUR
WEBSITE IS SO SLOW, GOLLY GEE, WHAT HAPPENED?
CAN YOU TELL US
ABOUT IT?
I DON'T HAVE TO, THEY TOOK AWAY THE REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS.
AND IF THEY DO PAY THE RANSOM YOUR WEBSITE IS
FASTER, THAT WE WON'T KNOW BECAUSE THEY TOOK AWAY THE
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
IF YOU DON'T FIGHT THEM ON DAY ONE THE
NEW CAN TURN AROUND ON DAY TWO AND SAY, YOU AGREED WITH SMALLER
COMPANIES, WHAT ABOUT THESE FOUR BIG COMPANIES?
THE WHOLE THING
IS A TRICK BECAUSE THEY HATE NET NEUTRALITY, ONE OF THE REASONS
IS BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ALLOW CORPORATIONS TO TAKE COMPLETE
THE MINYAN AND CONTROL OVER THE INTERNET, SECONDLY THEY THINK
MULTINATIONAL BUSINESSES ARE ON THEIR SIDE, SO THEY THINK MAYBE
THEY WILL SHUT DOWN OUR POLITICAL OPPOSITION AND ALL THE
SUDDEN THEIR INFORMATION CAN'T GET OUT.
WE ALREADY CORRUPTED
ALL THE POLITICS BY BEING ABLE TO GIVE BRIBES TO POLITICIANS
AND CALL IT CAMPAIGN DONATIONS, NOW IF WE CAN SHUT OFF THE MIC
OF THE OTHER SIDE ALTOGETHER WE WIN AND WE DESTROY FREEDOM AND
HAND THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT OVER TO MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS.
THAT IS AJIT PAI'S MISSION AND HE'S BEEN SENT ON THE
MISSION BY DONALD TRUMP.