loretta sanchez is uh... congresswoman from california as she was part of a
hearing where the government
finally let our congresspeople our representatives know what they were
doing it
you would think that maybe you have that relational earlier now
oftentimes will hear people sitting on the intelligence committee in both the
senate and the house a out while i mean the congressman could've found out
if the above and to try
but if you're not on that committee why would you go around saying like okay by
the way about the but and we're committed to it
and give it a classified information
just not how it works in fact senator john testers said hey you know what
i don't know what you should do with snowden who was a leader in this case he
did break the law
but i'm glad i don't know what we're doing
because of snow and he said otherwise
no the white house was not telling us is a branch was not telling the senators
and congressmen outside of the intelligence committee well his word is
really interesting
when they found out what they were doing
or more
there are several people that you have sitting cluding
he's also saying
names that have arisen tells us to voice to look as aboard the president on the
democrat
boring it seems like he's bigger than we realize and then here comes the florida
straits
uh... what we learned in there
in sydney
nificantly more
then what is out in the yet today
i can't speak
so what we learned in there
uh...
and i don't know informaci
are other leaks if there is more information somewhere
somebody house is going to step up
but i will tell you
i believe it's just the tip of the iceberg
estou but don't know how to grow these things
now for she keeps
saying that it's all legal because it's her president from her party
so she's magma from one of the muscle say it's a legal but obviously she's
very concerned
to the table iceberg
terms of what we already know will we already know ziyada iceberg if that's
the tip of the iceberg find out what's underneath
your article acting all the data on who we call the cetera and the other email
side the prism program culex the content of the emails the web says he went to
its sender
now they claim we only inadvertently collect that information about some
americans
only three billion piece of data every single month
but apparently they do a helluva lot more than that
more from sanchez
and i think i think this is broader than most people
and than most people even realize and i think that's
in one way or the standard some of us to again but remember our wanted consonant
with that
these programs are legal
under the law
that's probably more to come out of this problem more to come out
and the public
but certainly the companies that will realize that this issue isn't going away
well first of all excuse insisting that their legal but actually four different
courts
have questioned the legality or their constitutionality
there the reality is that in three of those instances
made hackney were overturned on a technicality because nobody had standing
to challenge because we know was being spied on
but four different courts including eighty six page decision from the plot
is a quote which normally rubber stamps almost everything
saying that the program is a legal or and or unconstitutional so does this
president bala and the democrats and similar problems keep safely look
doesn't necessarily make it so
again what's interesting is she keeps saying it's a much broader than you
realize what we already know is pretty disastrous if it's much broader than
that
i guess that's
disaster the size of an iceberg
one remember it's going to prove he does one quote from lauren it's a chance you
said
what we learned in there
is signifi really more
and what is out in the media today
all wars