I've gone over everything and I've been able to find out,
nobody like Dominion voting systems, nobody.
Has anybody forensically examined these machines since the election.
>> We have only been allowed access to a few of them.
We've got evidence of corruption all across the country in countless districts.
They used the machines to trash large batches of votes that should have been
awarded to president Trump.
Jenk I want to turn now to some more poison pills and those are the ones who've
been given out by Sean Hannity now for quite some time, there's a major
lawsuit against him against Fox News from defamation lawsuit from Dominion.
You'll know Dominion is the vote counting machines and
the people they've gone out after said that this was a skewed election.
Well it turns out that Sean Hannity now says, all along he knew it was,
he was asked under oath, and in August deposition, he agreed with the theories
that there was voter fraud and democratic interference in the election.
He said, I do not believe it for one second.
This is from the New York Times and that was from the court testimony,
I do not believe it for one second.
This is someone who went on television and
talked about it as if it was fact every single night, all day long,
and on the radio, on podcast this is someone who pushed that theory.
That false theory and he now says, Jenk, that he didn't believe it for one second.
>> Yeah, look this is a double whammy against Fox News.
This is devastating.
And it also goes to show you man Hannity is not that bright.
Every lawyer in the building in Fox News must have been ripping their hair out
because let me tell you the part that is not getting enough attention about thi.
In order for Dominion to win, by the way, a multi billion dollar lawsuit
against Fox, they don't have to just prove that Sidney Powell and
Mike Lindell and others on Fox news who are lying about them,
they have to prove that intent, malice, okay.
That Fox News knew that it wasn't true and they put it on there anyway,
that is a very tough standard.
>> Yeah >> Hannity just helped them prove it.
Yeah, he just said, yeah, I knew I didn't believe it for one second and
we have a clip after clip of him airing those theories out,
even though he didn't believe it.
That's bad intent.
That's malice.
>> It is, this is November 30th Sidney Powell,
one of the attorneys that was trying to say that this was the case
going on his show the very same month that Joe Biden won the presidency.
And this is what Powell said when she came on his or if we go to number two here.
She on the Hannity show tied to together Trump bogeyman as the Daily Beast Note
in the write up including the dead Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez,
liberal philanthropist George Soros, communist Chinese money and the CIA.
That's from David Folkenflik on NPR.
So he kept entertaining this.
And again, if you think that this is a minor part of our press,
this is someone who is on the most watched cable network on probably
the most watched show though I don't know that to be the case.
And this is what people are seeing, they are seeing him say these things and
then come around and said, I didn't believe it for a second.
What does that say about Fox?
>> Yeah, and
Hannity is actually the second most watched Tucker Carlsons number one.
But Tucker Carlson also implicated here also took a deposition.
The judge cut off the lawyers before they said the exact quotes that
Tucker Carlson said.
But it was clear from the record that Tucker Carlson hemmed and
hawed and tried to avoid the question of whether he
knew that the charges of vote rigging was false.
But apparently according to the lawyers basically although
not as in starker terms as Hannity made said it, agreed yes,
they knew that it wasn't true and they carried it anyway.
>> Let's talk about the lawyers on the other side, right.
I mean, this is Fox News, this is a behemoth.
So going up against Fox News a pretty tough thing to do and people thought
that Fox probably had an advantage to some degree in this in this case.
As a matter of fact, Jeremy peters of the New York Times wrote that the high legal
standard of proof in defamation cases makes it difficult for
a company like Dominion to prevail against a media organization like Fox News.
Dominion has to persuade a jury that people at Fox were in effect saying one
thing in private while telling their audience exactly the opposite.
That requires showing a jury convincing evidence that speaks to the state of
mind of those that were making the decisions at the network.
Well, in Delaware Superior Court on why Wednesday, yesterday in Delaware,
the Dominion's lawyers argued that they had obtained ample evidence
to make the case that in fact they know that Fox knew what was going on.
One lawyer for Dominion said, not a single Fox witness so far have produced anything
supporting the various false claims about the company that were uttered repeatedly
on the network, not a single Fox witness had produced any evidence here.
It's affirming to people like you and me and
the people that are watching this most of them anyway, who knew this, right?
Who knew that Fox was going on, was telling other people that they were fake
news when in fact they were purveying the fakest news that we have ever seen in
this country and they knew they were doing it, it was performance art.
>> Yeah, and so guys buy or be wary, now you know,
and notice that when they're on air, they lie 24/7.
The minute they get into a courtroom and lies have actual legal
consequences where a guy like Sean Hannity, who makes 40 million
a year might have to go to jail if he tells a lie on the record.
All of a sudden he's like, yeah, [LAUGH] of course I was lying the whole time on
air, I didn't believe it for a second.
All of a sudden he tells you what's actually true and
you've seen this over and over again in other cases.
Fox attorneys making the claim that no reasonable person
would believe any of our anchors on air.
They say such outrageous things.
How could any reasonable person believe them?
But at the same time, Fox executives know full well that people believe that,
of course people believe them.
>> Of course it wasn't just Hannity where it's important to know that it wasn't just
Sean Hannity that was doing this.
So the Fox executives knew it.
In fact, this is number five.
This included Meade Cooper, this is coming from Dominion's lawyer,
Stephen Shackelford.
Meade Cooper overseas prime-time programming for Fox News and
the prime-time star Tucker Carlson, the lawyer Shackelford
said many of the highest ranking Fox people have admitted under oath,
they never believed the Dominion lies.
He said naming both MS Cooper and Mr Carlson,
that's also from the New York Times.
And then he went on to describe how Tucker Carlson had tried to quote squirm out of
it at his deposition when asked what he really believed.
So this is company wide, this isn't limited to Sean Hannity,
he is not a journalist, but an advocate.
He campaigns for Republican candidates and then comes on tv and says,
we report you decide, he showed up at many events for Donald Trump and
for other senators, I saw him at a Ted Cruz rally.
So in fact he is somebody who is not a journalist, but
he is the person in this case who is the kind of front and center,
but it went all the way throughout.
>> Yeah, and there's another giant problem for Fox News in this lawsuit.
They're gonna lose a lot of money man.
They're eventually gonna have to settle.
And it's gonna be for a monster number
because Fox News is part of a larger corporation Fox Corp.
And Fox corporate executives sent memos
basically admitting we know this isn't true and
trying to get it under control, right?
And they were not able to get it under control, but that shows
that the larger and more profitable, Fox corporation was also involved,
which means they're going to lose even more money.
So, it has an effect on how much Fox News can lie if they lose about
a billion dollars for it.
It might make them a little bit more gun shy.
So that could be an interesting effectiveness,
but that would be a major, major pivot for Fox News.
If they had to tell their anchors to tell the truth,
that would change the entire content of the channel and I'm not joking.
>> No, no, it's dead right.
And that's why even some of these people who have been looking at this from
the Donald Trump world have been looking at Fox have said, yeah, we're
done with Fox, because it seems like lou dobbs leaving after the smartmatic case.
This lawsuit people sort of acquiescing to what's happening with this lawsuit at
Fox within the walls of Fox.
Producer at Fox reportedly begging Janine to producers to stop
Janine Pirro from going on and to talking about lies.
All of this stuff getting out said, go watch Newsmax,
go watch OAN because they're more on our team.
This is gonna hurt Fox from both sides,
could go to a jury trial if it doesn't settle in April of next year.
I can't imagine Fox wants a jury trial, but it certainly would be great to see
a jury of 12 people say that Fox knew that these lies were going on