>>> HOW PEOPLE ON THE TWITTER
SAYS BAD THINGS TO ME.
WHAT A SNOWFLAKE.
LOOK, MAN, I THINK ITS TERRIBLE
WHEN KIDS ARE BULLIED ONLINE,
BUT FOR A GROWN MAN, THIS
SHOULDNT BE POSSIBLE.
FIRST OF ALL, DONT CLICK ON
YOUR MENTIONS.
YOU ARE CHOOSING TO VISIT YOUR
BULLIES.
HEY, TREVOR, CLICK HERE TO GET A
WEDGIE.
THE LAWSUIT FAILED, BUT
APPARENTLY DEVIN NUNES DID NOT
STOP THERE.
A NEWLY UNSEALED COURT FILING,
ONE REVEALS IN THE FINAL MOST,
THE CONGRESSMAN COORDINATED WITH
A TRUMP-APPOINTED U.S. ATTORNEY
IN SECRETLY OBTAINING A GRAND
JURY SUBPOENA LAST YEAR IN AN
ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY A PERSON
BEHIND A TWITTER ACCOUNT
DEDICATED TO MOCKING NUNES.
AFTER IT WAS FILED IN ACCEPT,
TWITTER TOOK EXCEPTION TO IT,
BIDEN TOOK OFFICE, AND THE DOJ
SUPPRESSED THE SUBPOENA.
>> JOINING US IS ANDREW WISEMAN.
AND NANCY PARKER IS HERE.
LUCKY FOR US THEYRE BOTH HERE.
I WANTED TO TRAVEL DOWN MEMORY LANE WITH YOU.
LANE WITH YOU.
DEVIN NUNEZINE NONE -- NUNES WAS
DOWN AT THE WHO YOU GETTING
DROPPED OFF IN UBERS, TRYING TO
UNMASK PEOPLE.
WHAT PART OF THE STORY INTRIGUES YOU?
ONE WAS, AS YOU MENTIONED DEVIN
NUNES WAS RAILING ABOUT AN
UNMASKING, AND BASIC LE HE AND
THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
WERE TRYING TO UNMASK THE IDENTITY OF THIS SEEMS LIKE A
IDENTITY OF THIS SEEMS LIKE A
PRETTY ANONYMOUS PARITY, SATIRE
TWITTER USER.
SO THERES SIGNS HE CAN GIVE IT,
BUT CANT REALLY TAKE IT.
AND THEN HE DOESNT USE THIS
WORD, BUT HE DOESNT LIKE THIS
MISINFORMATION BEING LEVELED
AGAINST HIM.
THIS WAS ALSO NOT THE ACCOUNT HE
TRIED TO GO AFTER, BUT A --
ACCOUNT THAT POKED -- HE DIDNT
LIKE THE COW PUNS, BUT WASNT A
RHO -- THAT DONALD TRUMP SPREAD
ABOUT THE RESULTS OF THE
ELECTION THAT LED TO A DEADLY
INSURRECTION ON JANUARY 6th.
THOSE ARE SORT OF TWO AREAS THAT
ARE PARTICULARLY INTRIGUING TO
ME.
>> ANDREW IS MORE DIPLOMATIC
THAN I AM.
HE WAS NOT THE LAST, BUT THE
FIRST TRUMP SHILL AMONG THE
HOUSE REPUBLICANS.
ON THE POWERFUL INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE TRYING TO AID TRUMP.
I WANT TO ASK YOU TO HELP US
UNDERSTAND WHAT COULD HAVE LED
TO SQUASH THAT, IT SEEMS LIKE
SOME OF ES WERE LED TO
BELIEVE -- UNTIL BILL BARR, IT
WAS FLOWING FORWARD, UNDER JOE
BIDEN IT WAS STOPPED.
LET ME READ SOME OF THE FACTS.
THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS A
SUBPOENA THAT THEY FILED IN
MARCH, THAT THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT SENT TWITTER A DIZZY
MAND, SO TRUMP HAD LOST, BUT
THIS WAS STILL BEFORE THE
INAUGURATION -- TO PROVIDE IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ABOUT
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ABOUT
THE USERS NUNES ALT.
E OBVIOUS BACKFIRED BY
PROPELLETS THEN TO -- I FOLLOW
BOTH OF THEM NOW.
FROM BEING HELD LIABLE, AND FIVE
MONTHS LATER, THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT STEPPED IN WITH ITS
GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, ARGUING IT
NEEDED TO IDENTIFY THE PERSON
BEHIND THE ACCOUNT, BECAUSE
THERE WAS A CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION INVOLVING
INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
MY BIGGEST QUESTION IS, ARE
THERE ANY FACTS TO JUSTIFY THE
ISSUANCE OF THE GRAND JURY
SUBPOENA IN NOVEMBER OF 2020.
THE CLAIM IN THE TWITTER PAPERS
WHERE THEY QUOTE AN ASSISTANT
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY IN THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAYING THIS
WAS DONE BECAUSE OF THREATENING
COMMUNICATIONS.
THAT SEEMS TRANSPARENTALLY
THING, BECAUSE WE HAVE ALL OF
THE TWISTER ACCOUNTS AND FEEDS.
WE CAN SEE THAT.
ALSO, IF THERE WAS ANYTHING TO
IT, WHY IS IT TWO MONTHS LATER
THAT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS
SAYING, YOU KNOW WHAT?
WERE GOING TO GIVE THIS UP, AND
THAT THERES A THREAT TO A
CONGRESSIONAL OFFICER THATS
GOING TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
THIS REALLY SMACKS OF A GRAND
JURY SUBPOENA BEING ISSUED FOR
POLITICAL PURPOSES.
THE WAY I LOOK AT THIS IS NOT SO
MUCH ABOUT DEVIN NUNES, BUT THE
SAME WEEK WE LEARNED ABOUT THE
JUSTICEDENYING FEDERAL
PROSECUTORS THE SEARCH OF RUDY
GIULIANIS DEVICES, TWICE WE ARE
ASKED, AND MAIN JUDD SAID, NO.
THAT THAT IS TO SHIELD FRIENDS.
HERE YOU HAVE THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT BY ALL ACCOUNTS, THAT
THEYRE USING THE GRAND JURY AS
A SWORD ON BEHALF OF A POLITICAL
ALLY.
THATS REALLY, YOU KNOW, THE
ROAD TO HELL FOR A DEMOCRACY.
THE RULE OF LAW MEANS THAT IT
APPLIES WHETHER THEYRE
DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS IN
POWER, AND THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT ISNT SUPPOSED TO DO
THE BIDDING OF EITHER.
>> ROAD TO HELL, YOUVE GOT MY
ATTENTION.
LET ME JUST PRESS YOU A LITTLE
FURTHER.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE WERE THREATS FROM THIS ACCOUNT TO
THREATS FROM THIS ACCOUNT TO
DEPARTMENT NUNES, THAT THE
GARLAND/ MONACO WOULD HAVE
DROPPED THE CASE?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
WHEN ITCHES IN THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OR COULD BE TRYING TO
PROTECT SOMEBODY FROM THREATS.
IT DOESNT MATTER.
THATS JUST A COMMON IDEA THAT I
THINK ANY AMERICAN I THINK WOULD
BE THINK IS RIGHT.
THERES NO WAY IN GODS GREEN
EARTH THAT LISA MONACO OR
MERRICK GARLAND ARE GOING TO
QUASH AN INVESTIGATION THATS
RIGHTEOUS ABOUT SOMEBODY TRULY
THREATENING SOMEBODY WHOS IN