Hello, my friends. Good day to you wherever you are.
I'm pausing for a couple of days on the
Vigyan Bhairava Tantra
commentaries. I'm traveling at the moment, but I'll be sure to get back.
But today I want to share with you
an insight.
I want your opinion
and actually I will
send this video to
quantum physicists and others
to get their opinion as well.
So let's
let me share what I want to share with you.
Everybody now agrees in the field of
quantum physics
that the objects that we observe, the material objects that we observe
are ultimately quantum in nature, even large objects,
not just miniscule.
They are quantum nature as a fundamental
reality,
even though we experience them as objects,
their source or their fundamental reality is quantum
and nobody disagrees
that the so-called objective world
is quantum.
Of course, I wrote a book called Quantum healing many years ago, which was
essentially vilified by mainstream,
including most importantly quantum physicists.
Currently,
I'm writing a book called quantum body because if the body is a material object,
it also has to be quantum.
And this time, I have
as my coauthors
Jack Tuszyński
who is a quantum physicist and,
and Brian Fertig who's a neuroendocrinologist
like myself.
And it's about the quantum nature
of our so-called physical body.
But here's the real crux of what I want to share with you.
You know, if you go to chat GPT or advanced AI and say
"is the mind quantum?"
And do you agree with
Deepak Chopra
and others who think the mind is quantum?
They'll basically say no, it's pseudoscience,
no real
academic and qualified
quantum physicist would agree
that the mind or consciousness or whatever
the observing mind is
is quantum in nature
and
Deepak Chopra's views and even those of other
scientists who have shared that view
is
is pseudoscience. It's not real science.
So here's my question to all of you who are listening.
Is there
an observed object without an observing entity
that we call
the mind? Essentially the mind is
that helps us observe.
Can there be an observing object
without
an observing mind?
Is there an object or the experience of an object without the mind?
And the answer should be obvious, you know that the observer
and
that which is observed
are entangled in every
every experience,
there can't be something called observation
unless there's an observer
in the mind
and there's something to be observed, the object,
the physical object that is considered
to be quantum in nature
the answer is obvious you need both observer and observed
to have an observation.
So if the observer is the mind and the mind
and that which is observed are entangled
as the experience
and in the deeper reality, if observer
and observed are actually one,
then
how is the mind
not quantum?
What is the argument against the quantum mind?
The mind obeys those principles?
You know, it's a field of possibilities, let's say consciousness
instead of mind consciousness field of possibilities.
Consciousness is unpredictable
consciousness correlates
and is entangled as mind
body body universe
all is unified activity.
Consciousness is creative
consciousness takes leaps of creativity through discontinuity.
And consciousness is
is
unlike any object that we see and yet without it,
there's no observing object.
And if they are entangled and in the deeper
reality subject and object are one,
then what is the argument against quantum mind
just that we cannot do experiments with it? Well,
we need the mind to do experiments, we need consciousness
to conceive and construct and
and and share ideas
and even talk about the objective world,
which itself is a construct for human perceptual activity
modified consciousness.
So
mind is quantum
body is quantum universe is quantum
and consciousness
is the source of the quantum mind,
the quantum body
and the quantum universe.
What's the problem? What's the argument against it?
Please share with me your ideas.
And if you're a scientist or a physicist
please share. Also, I want to learn what the argument is.
I think the argument comes from naive realism,
which believes in subject -object split,
which believes in matter as the ontological primitive
and which also believes
that the human
look of the universe is the real
objective universe.
There's no real objective universe.
It's a species specific perceptual activity.
Please share your
ideas, comments.
Disagreements
over here, if you will,
I'd like to start a conversation on this topic.
Quantum mind quantum body quantum universe.
Thank you.