Are you sick of the onslaught of negative political ads
that air on your TV every election season?
The fear-mongering.
The half-truths.
Believe it or not, there’s a simple reform we can enact to
make elections more bearable for voters.
It’s called ranked-choice voting, or RCV,
and it could change our politics for the better.
Here’s a quick refresher on how it works, using some pets
owned by my colleagues here at Inequality Media.
When you head to the ballot box under ranked-choice voting,
instead of voting for just one candidate, you have the option to rank candidates
in order of preference: first, second, third, and so on.
So if you’re stuck between two preferred candidates for a position,
you can spread your preferences out in hopes that one of them wins.
I really like Daisy, but I think Beatrix might be a better choice.
So I’ll rank Beatrix first, and Daisy second.
When ballots are counted, if none of the candidates gets an outright majority,
the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed to their supporters’
second choice candidate.
This process continues until a candidate receives over 50% of the vote,
and is declared the winner.
Congratulations Beatrix!
Pretty cool, huh?
It’s also good for a whole host of other reasons.
Implementing RCV could have the added benefit
of making our elections…well…
nicer.
Take the recent election in Alaska for example.
Palin: It's so funny that even in this race
people actually hold our friendship against us.
Compare that to what we see in places without RCV.
"Far left John Fetterman is too far left.
He's dangerously liberal on crime."
In a ranked-choice voting system, candidates are less likely
to engage in this kind of mudslinging,
because they’re not just trying to be a voter's first choice
— they also want to be the second choice of voters who
are backing their opponents.
This can motivate anyone running for office to be more
inclusive and appeal to a broader range of voters
— helping to connect people who don’t
always agree on every issue.
RCV also allows us to exercise our right to vote without feeling
like we’re compromising our beliefs
or simply voting for the “lesser of two evils.”
We can vote FOR the candidates we like the most, rather than
voting AGAINST the candidates we like the least.
RCV could also open the door to voters casting their ballots for more third-party candidates.
Even if your favorite candidate from your preferred party
is not favored to win, that person could
still be your first choice — without you feeling
like you're giving up your vote entirely.
If your candidate doesn’t make it to the final round,
your second or third choice could still
end up winning in the final tally.
Ranked-choice voting can even change the kinds of people who
run for office — for the better.
Potential candidates wouldn’t have to avoid running for fear of
splitting the vote or “spoiling” a close election
— allowing for a potentially more diverse pool of candidates to run.
Again, look at Alaska, where voters used RCV to elect
Mary Peltola to Congress — making her the first Alaska Native and first woman
to represent the state in the U.S. House.
Lastly, ranked-choice voting saves everyone
— you, me, elections officials —
time and money.
There would no longer be runoffs,
which can be costly and often have lower turnout
— which means election results that are less likely to reflect the will of the public.
There’s a reason why RCV is starting to sweep the nation
— it’s currently being used by 13 million voters across the country.
Ranked-choice voting makes elections less painful, less expensive, and can help make
our government more inclusive and responsive to what people actually want.
Maybe you can organize to make ranked-choice voting
a reality where you live.