nearly a week
Canada and Australia broke the news
Alleging that the Chinese military aircraft carried out the so-called danger of its warplanes
dangerous interception
Austria even said
Chinese military planes once released thin-striped jamming bombs
But it must be pointed out that
Austrian is deliberately confusing the audition
for example
Australian military plane travels thousands of miles to the South China Sea
Investigate bad intentions
another example
Where is the spellcasting area in the South China Sea?
these key details
All were deliberately concealed and avoided by the Austrian side.
Ogana military planes meet for hype
Chinese Ministry of Defense Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded
According to the Australian Minister of Defence
Mallus' statement
At that time, the PLA J-16 fighter jet was 8 p8 away from the Austrian side.
a plane is very close
and released some thin strips containing small aluminum flakes
The engine of the p 8a reconnaissance plane sucked in some debris
It is worth noting that
The so-called small aluminum sheet mainly comes from
Mallus himself
no other evidence
Analysis pointed out
The so-called thin strip may mean that the thin strip interferes with nitrogen
this disruptor egg
is a taste for countering radar
Interference consumables are usually wire
Metal foil or fiberglass with metal coating
Generally used for taste interference
usually
Thin-stripe jammers are released over enemy targets
Then the thin strips split and spread into clouds and landed at low speed
Scatters enemy radar signals
make it not work
Analysts also believe that
According to the limited information released by the Austrian side
It is also not ruled out that it is the infrared jamming pod on the opp 8 a
Irradiates Chinese fighter jets with its lasers
or other systems of Australian military aircraft
Triggered the taste system of Chinese fighters
The Chinese fighter jets were launched
Infrared jammers and barges
Because thin strips and IR jammers are
Serving according to a pre-set program
Both are usually used together
The outside world also noticed
In addition to groundless accusations of Chinese military aircraft
very dangerous behavior
The Australian side deliberately concealed and avoided some key details
For example, where is the area of ​​the incident in the South China Sea?
How far is it from the outskirts of Zhongfang Island?
What's their purpose here
Furthermore, before the interception
What the hell did the Austrian military do?
Australia's South China Sea Policy
There has been a big change in recent years
just before
Australia has been on the South China Sea issue
claim to maintain a vague position
I just don't want to make it public
But in July 2020
Australia follows US
Submitted a statement to the United Nations
is to oppose China's claims in the South China Sea
at the same time
Australia is also starting to follow the US
keep dispatching warships
Military aircraft to South China Sea for so-called freedom of navigation
Well, although it is verbally free navigation
But we all know the actual purpose
is to provoke China
Australia has followed in the footsteps of the US in recent years
confrontation in the South China Sea
many times
Use reconnaissance planes to take provocative actions against China
According to the introduction of South China Sea Strategic Situational Awareness
February 24 this year
A p 8 a of the Austrian Air Force
Anti-front patrol aircraft deployed from homeland
To Okinawa Kasuna Base
Only two weeks later
Accumulated 6 trips to the East China Sea north of Taiwan
Carry out arrival investigation activities
According to the Ministry of Defense
On February 17, the Chinese naval formation
while operating in the waters north of Australia
Was attacked by a p 8 a of the Austrian Air Force
The tracking nuisance of anti-front patrol aircraft
The nearest distance to the Chinese ship is only 4 kilometers
The Austrian Ministry of Defense is the first to sue the villain
say
Chinese navy ships used lasers to irradiate Austria on the 17th
The logic of the military's anti-foreign patrol was denied by the Chinese side
last November
There was also an invasion of the Australian military aircraft against Pakistan.
China's Paracel Islands Airspace Incident
Serious damage to China's sovereignty
Review these events
Austria's smearing of the Chinese military is exactly the same
Gao and other countries have frequently hyped such topics recently.
Exudes a smell of the Five Eyes Alliance
These countries eavesdrop on other people's doorsteps
but feel righteous
Analysis pointed out
Foreign swordsmen sway around the door of China to make small moves
The People's Liberation Army will inevitably adopt tracking and surveillance
warn
Measures to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity
Even if the Jiaao fighter has really encountered
blocked situation
also banned
Ignore Chinese warnings during investigation
In the process of establishing, it also blindly illegally contradicts
in this case
The PLA must take tougher measures to deal with
defend airspace security
on Monday
Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, published an article saying
My sweetheart is coming to China to do business
But it's a mama who can't afford aerial confrontation games
The article states
The two Eyeless Alliance countries
both show international pooping
rogue face
because of their alleged friction
Both occurred over the waters near China
Even some Canadian netizens asked
their country's military aircraft
Run next to China, 8,000 kilometers away
what to do
The South China Sea is also far from Australia
But Australia's performance here
As if he was a country in the territory
The article also reads
Canada and Australia please
Specialize in strategy first
Come to China to do things around
must accept
China's confrontational boycott
also
their pilots need more training
Endured with Chinese pilots
at a distance where you can see each other's faces
The game does not panic
In the event of an accident such as a collision
Send planes and warships to the door of China to make trouble
from canada and australia
take full responsibility
Australia's Defence Ministry sues first on Sunday
one of the Austrian Air Force
Anti-foreign aircraft in South China Sea airlift blocked by PLA fighter jets
Austrian side accuses China of so-called dangerous approach
and release stalks
What is your analysis on this
Assuming that what the Austrian claimed actually happened
Then I can describe it in one sentence
That is
An anti-forward patrol aircraft of the Royal Australian Air Force
Trying to build a sense of presence over the South China Sea
I am responsible
Tracking and monitoring of the PLA's J-16 record
Lost in friendly exchanges
Angry Australian side
intend to use the media
Accusing PLA pilots of so-called brutal driving
Military struggle in peacetime
Follow the appropriate game rules
in international waters
airspace or
Over some territorial disputed areas
Such so-called friendly discussions are staged every day
like greece
with Turkish Air Force fighter jets
Wagging tails over the Aegean Sea
the Russian Air Force
Mutual expulsion with NATO fighter jets over the Barentes Sea
Another example is the People's Liberation Army's naval and air power and the Sea of ​​Japan
The daily game around the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone
This so-called friendly discussion
in addition to the actual use of weapons
Pilots compete in the air according to their abilities
either you dump me
Either you're exhausted and you turn around and go home
Australia's rake
accusing China of so-called dangerous approach
It can only show that he was defeated
Is the level not flowing?
What's more intriguing about this is that
Australia's anti-front patrol aircraft
Why come to the South China Sea to gain a sense of presence
From the perspective of Australia's national defense construction since the Cold War
their limited air and sea power
Mainly used in the Indian Ocean
South Pacific Islands waters
and the surrounding waters of Oceania
A trip to the South China Sea is already a corpse expedition.
According to Kaiyuan information,
The Australian Air Force's tactical number is
a 47 bar 008 anti-interval patrol aircraft
in February this year from
Australia's local deployment system in Okinawa plus a hand-held base
That is to say
Australian Air Force fighter jets are using the
Military bases of Asia-Pacific allies
Launched military reconnaissance operations on the sea and air around China
Please note that the initiator of the action is the other party
Now the other side is trying to use the so-called official statement
How to empower the media
hype it up
It's a bit of a public opinion war.
This reminds me of
then
CNN reporter boarded US Navy P-8A anti-front patrol aircraft
Circling over Chinese islands in the South China Sea
Using propaganda machines for so-called South China Sea arbitration
The old almanac prepared by public opinion
Routines are similar
Path heights are the same
So the motivation on the Australian side
Is it also not simple?