Donald Trump and his gang of misfits, they continue to push this tired,
tired election fraud scheme over and over and
over again how he was cheated out of the 2020 election.
Yes I said 2020 that one that was over a year ago.
Well every time they keep pushing this stuff and
then now saying Mike Pence had the right to overturn the election.
Which Trump said it forces his minions like Navarro Peter Navarro to go on and
have to answer this.
Very simple question.
Can Kamala Harris do the same thing?
Watch. >> It would follow from your contention
that you think Vice President Harris will ultimately have the call over who should
be president regardless of the results in the next election. >> See you misconstrued
the whole Green Bay sweep plan. It's not for
the Vice president
to determine who
wins, okay. The only
thing that Pence had the authority to do is go back to the States and
let the States look at the votes. It's the states in our constitution who
have the right to decide who won an election but
you're not answering the question.
And it seems like the question when you put it on Harris makes you ask for a
second. It seems like it makes you but it seems like it's making you stretch when we
just change the name from Pence to Harris are holding the content to wait, let me
finish the question. You'll get the response Peter
let me finish the question authority to change
the electoral results. >> Let me finish the question.
>> That was not the premise of our
argument. >> Think about what Navarro Jess said
there, he said ari you misconstrue the whole point the whole
Green Bay plan. Which you shouldn't probably you should
probably stop saying that was the plan. But this whole plan was to let Mike Pence
send it back to the States so they can overturn the election.
But actually even if that was the case, he misconstrued that it was about the States,
what did Donald Trump? Say again in that statement they were talking about with
Mike Pence that Navarro just said, he didn't say we have to do the whole thing.
But all you have to understand is that the end, he says actually what they're saying
is that Mike Pence did have the right to change the outcome. I didn't see anything
about states in there and
they now want to take
that right away. Unfortunately, he didn't exercise
that power. He could have overturned the election since the first time that they
said Donald Trump didn't say that explicitly right after he said that but
lying has never stopped Peter Navarro before. And in fact, he continued in
the same interview under your contention,
Vice President Harris could take
any states that her side lost and
selectively send those back. That's
your current contention If if any any vice president under
the Electoral Count Act of 1887 if there are objections that
are raised about the state's electors. The provision is
that you have two hours of yes or no paper and at the end of that
you have already spoken individual. Was that a yes? Because I didn't hear a yes.
Is that a yes for Harris? And now the way you frame the question
is wrong. You're assuming that the vice president had the ability to determine the
outcome wrong. All the vice president had was the ability to go back to the states
to have them. Look at the votes again. Peter probably should have told Donald
trump that you got it all wrong. Donnie, the vice President can't overturn
the election. We'll send it back to
the states that are listening to
you tell them they should
overturn the election and
let mike Pence. Just hand it over to you, Cenk. Yeah, so a couple of things here
that are important. First of all,
let's make the story about me.