is all bomb off the trojan horse that's a pretty serious charge uh... now in the
resurgence from articles say hey look p_l_o_ things that he wanted is now week
is really strong
uh... he said that you know that uh...
that he was going to protect
people out he didn't say is a vertex corporate donors buddy one of the
charges corporate donors
and as you don't have any real regulation or for that
he fought off real serious reform of wall street nobody on wall street ever
been that arrested you know i accept a twenty eight-year-old from goldman sachs
which is a joke a cetera when he is a health care reform is basically heritage
foundation
uh... you know mandates that we got there and you know when you get to the
war is they have to be in anything basically they've been increases that
are
glenn greenwald says look he's been saving beginning that he wants cussler
security he will be calls an entitlement reform he suddenly gotten office he
didn't say during the campaign but he did say that he had an office when you
put all that stuff together maybe we're just saying among its other days a week
progressive if that is a strong conservative
or act i think it's uh... you know he'd pretend promise change and he was going
to come and i think what he's changed
is that he's turned the presidency into like more of a middle-management kind of
decision
you know we still have to keep asking permission and for your overlords we can
do so
that's kinda knew thats kinda nice it is done and wealthy sort of says look
there's still an imperial presidency with all this tremendous power
so it's he thinks this wrong to say follies a middle manager and guiding
ontology workers who did not to use that power
using the leaders that are use that power and in fact his new flights that
are present brilliantly
and getting all these things to learn more about your priority i mean i don't
know if i would say uh... trojan horse simply because the thin are full but i
think
at the end of the day we were never know what's in it uh... president bombers
might but it's clear he's not a progressive is not a liberal who's
failing to achieve these goals is not aiming for those goals
here i'm surely after uh... deserving before his inauguration he was talking
about the grand marquis
the grand bargain is cut social security cut medicare and he is still
aggressively pursuing it
uh... we're going to talk about in the next time the but this timber committee
is completely set up the to cut the uh... to cut the
that medicare and social here the
and and so
at the end of it doesn't matter whether he's a trojan horse or not
his policies are his policies and programs are as programs and i know
where the fact that
armed he has a hehehe a
override goals for the almost common s come from all of the party that is
dealing with
but the fact that there is is that
he's not even on a rhetorical level
we gets out he says that uh... governments like a family we need to
tighten our belts
he's got that wrong and that's the fundamental in rwanda
for some people talking about on the run up the heat and there are there some
tricks
but it doesn't do that government's not like the family government has the
ability to know that they're going to have an income down the road
it's taxation
and said government what we've needed to expand and deficit spending and cut
uh... the military
but i'll ask you if you put that towards the deficit it still does what the car
company
you need to take that money and you need to put people to work with that you need
to create jobs
and if he doesn't give me a regardless of whether he believes in her heart not
doesn't matter
the senate that sort of president doesn't he should be judged by his
actions
not my what we perceive his integrity nafta let me play could wages from
direction gerry roeder courtesies inside the administration
and he gives a at you know it an interesting insight into how they think
priceless watch that
but the president stood firm
never point in this agreement represents that then you ask we do have a
bipartisan commission coming for in which the president gets to make his
case to them into the american people that we need to shared sacrifice that
that only a small group of people are country wanna see deficit reduction done
on the backs of seniors the middle class and students and don't want it
those who are most welcome active our most well-off to contribute at all three
additional revenues and tax reform judaism uh... you know you have looking
so much they've given seizure medications are you getting ahead he
stood firm on the new orleans livingston farmers in this guy i mean i i
it's an exact opposite i remember when george bush was president
and he would they would say something come to a press conference and if they
said it was uh... sunny outside i'll have to go out and check
writers uh... it's the same thing this is the same thing of the opposite side
of the same calling
they did the president stands for and he didn't blink and less
he stand firm on cardioversion social programs that didn't cause the deficit
yes he stood firm i think that's the best places where we disagree i don't
think you're going
because he went into this wanting to cut even more
i'm a few even the the flying that they're talking about the cutting the
deficit on the backs of uh... middle-class workers
we should tell you that as a parent
and they should not be dealing with the deficit right now at all
it's only a question who is responsible for it that's a secondary question
noted that the primary questions we should not have a deficit so he's not
bleeding
this is the agenda that he has been pursuing
i think that's the problem in the evening agree with that on joe
scarborough like they're all sit around all gas deficit is a longer term
internet show
and so here is the president and about what he wouldn't he wouldn't agree with
that if the fifth of the president was angry at you because her brother away
you know i think it in the second half of that sperling is talking about hate
you know what we need a bounce approaching weekend to some of my report
of a poster
but at some other fires for all so but how does he think and i'd love that song
because it's really curious about intent
because you really believe that they're fighting for those people or if you
think you let me go blind has to be so much about one's own internal revenue
increases he's talking about he's talking about the high note we'll hear
and bargain is that what they do is they can get rid of some deductions whether
that hurts devastate the middle class like deal with a home mortgage deduction
and then what are they do they give tax breaks for the rich and the corporations
they cut those taxes
and whose joca
with his arm that was allowed us to show unsafe why do you really think that
they're helping class president eisenhower i do think it back to the
obama administration feels like we do need more revenues from the rich
uh... how much they're willing to fight for it is you know well we've seen an
interview with uh... it
hyderabad put up a fight as part of the window dressing within the date that is
secondary to the issue of we should not
the cutting at this time
there is no economic reasonable validity to doing that
this is sort of a window dressing
everyone's got a share the sacrifice what course of boy and watch
what trillion-dollar
that anybody over two hundred fifty thousand dollars uh... making the
two hundred fifty thousand dollars a guy who sacrifice what
nothing routing zero below zero the bigger question that's an object is
what do we do about this like my whole thing is this would never happen if we
had a republican president john mccain won i think that the democrats would
never let medicare so security cuts go through congress ever but here we are
the democrats dislike repeal nixon with the giant so the republicans did you
write about he's he's kind of frozen the democrats he's neutralize them so that's
what we have it in random
with so how do we get rid of them right so what do we do buckets so that's a
great question in a tough question but first but let me tell you what i think
that the trojan horse the in relation to answer that question
op i don't think he says there goes one off buying a republican and i will
personally however i didn't realize that rest
by the v_f_w_ from time to time is the son of a recent is once again she said
business problems you progressives
so i don't think he views himself as a progressive but i don't leave using
sells a conservative right but he views himself as this neutral
blog right that he has the best interests of the
people in mind and all the way do you see that is to compromise
no matter what the compromise and just do it right that's is a fine if
resolution of course no principle or all right above the expected he's having to
sense point
look uh...
because our bristles or one hundred-percent when we get a dollar
uh... from the people made over a quarter million dollars right
and all that was in the middle class anagram bargain the next round is
getting even worse right
sollu what do we do jimmy while outlook uh...
you know i don't think that elections at this point unless i'm not saying that
don't vote by that's crazy talk
always but i think you should vote right but having said that that is not to be
answered two meet ups have broad question i would say we have to put all
ranji into doing a constitutional amendment
tuesday work over person
uh... when corporations were allowed to spend money on politics
answered about nineteen seventy eight
it has been downhill ever since that to hurt your earlier point earlier in our
that is when we decided to stagnate for ninety percent of us that is when the
top
the people in scotia out one percent went up two hundred eighty one percent
her income that
corporations are doing axle record-breaking profits right now
the rest of us org in disastrous shape it all stems from that same thing we've
got a dress that but a lot of people bomb or romney isn't gonna make it
anywhere near large enough different