ROLLING STONE ARE SAYING "HOLY
GOD, WHAT A CLOWN SHOW THIS
WHOLE THING WAS."
>> TWO YEARS TOO LATE.
THEY HAVE VILIFIED EVERYONE.
THOSE OF US FOR TWO YEARS HAVE
BEEN SAYING WE LIKE THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
WE NEED A GOOD DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE.
WHAT THEY DID WAS WRONG.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT REPORT COMEY
READ.
IT'S THE THIRD IG REPORT THAT'S
ON HIS CONDUCT TO BE
SUBSTANDARD.
IF THAT'S A VICTORY LAP, IF HE
WANTS TO TAKE A VICTORY LAP
BECAUSE HE'S NOT INDICTED, MORE
POWER TO HIM.
DON'T WRITE ANYMORE BOOKS ON
ETHICS.
DON'T TELL ME WHAT THE ETHICAL
STANDARD IS IF YOU THINK THIS
REPORT VINDICATES YOU.
>> Martha: I HAVE FOLLOWED THE
STORY VERY CLOSELY, COVERED IT
FOR YEARS.
THERE WERE THINGS I LEARNED IN
THE PAST COUPLE DAYS LOOKING AT
THIS REPORT AND I KNOW THAT YOU
WERE PRIVY TO A LOT OF IT BEFORE
IT ALL CAME OUT.
TO SORT OF PUT A FINE POINT ON
SOME OF THIS, YOU HAVE
CARTER PAGE WHO WAS IN THE NAVY,
THEN WAS AN ASSET FOR THE CIA,
FOR A FLORAL ASSET TO GIVE THEM
INFORMATION OVER TIME.
THEY HAD A RELATIONSHIP AND HE
WAS TRAVELING AND DOING EVENTS
AND GIVING INFORMATION.
THE FBI SAYS TO THE CIA OR TO
ALL AGENCIES, IS THIS INDIVIDUAL
WE ARE LOOKING AT AN ASSET OF
ANY OF YOURS AND THE CIA COMES
BACK AND SAYS YEAH, HE'S ONE OF
OURS.
THEY CHANGE IT BECAUSE THEY WANT
TO PUT A TAIL ON THIS GUY.
THAT'S A TRAVESTY.
HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN?
>> WRONG PEOPLE DOING THE WRONG
JOB.
IT'S THE MOST DAMNING PART THAT
CAME OUT OF HOROWITZ.
I DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT FBI
LAWYER, SOMEONE WE HAVE
INCREDIBLE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
TO WOULD CHANGE SOMEONE'S
STATUS.
KEEP IN MIND THE
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
INVESTIGATION IS BECAUSE YOU
THINK CARTER PAGE IS WORKING ON
BEHALF OF RUSSIA.
THE REALITY IS CARTER PAGE WAS
WORKING ON BEHALF OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND YOU
CHANGE IT FROM HE IS A SOURCE TO
HE'S NOT A SOURCE WHICH IS A
MANIFESTLY UNFAIR THING TO DO TO
CARTER PAGE.
WHEN HOROWITZ SAYS THERE WAS NO
BIAS IN THE INCEPTION, NO BIAS,
THERE WAS A LOT OF BIAS FROM
EVERY POINT THEREAFTER INCLUDING
AN FBI LAWYER MANUFACTURING
EVIDENCE TO GIVE A SURVEILLANCE
WARRANT AGAINST AN AMERICAN
CITIZEN.
MARTHA, THAT IS NOT THE FBI.
I WANT YOUR VIEWERS UNDERSTAND
THAT THAT IS NOT THE FBI THAT I
WORKED WITH.
IT'S NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF 99.9%
OF THE BUREAU AGENTS I KNOW.
THEY'VE GOT A PROBLEM AND IF YOU
ARE CHANGING EMAILS,
MANUFACTURING, ALTERING EVIDENCE
WHICH IS A CRIME, BECAUSE YOU
WANT TO GET AT SOMEBODY AND YOU
WANT THEM TO BE -- YOU DON'T
WANT THEM TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES, NOT ONLY DO NOT
HAVE ANY BUSINESS BEING IN THE
FBI BUT YOU SHOULD PROBABLY BE
WEARING AN ORANGE JUMPSUIT.
>> Martha: THE QUESTION IS
WHY.
WHY WOULD YOU CHANGE IT.
IN THE BEST-CASE SCENARIO IF YOU
THINK MAYBE HE'S A DOUBLE AGENT
OR SOMETHING, AREN'T YOU GOING
TO BRING SOMEBODY IN AT THE CIA.
WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS GUY.
JOHN BRENNAN WAS RUNNING THE
CIA.
WHY DID HE REACH OUT AND PROTECT
HIS GUY?
CARTER PAGE, HOLD ON.
>> HE HAS HAD AMPLE OPPORTUNITY.
THESE INTERVIEWS HE GIVES ABOUT
HOW TRUMP OUGHT TO BE IN THE
DUSTBIN OF HISTORY AND HOW
TREASONOUS HE IS, IT WOULD BE
NICE IF HE WOULD STICK UP AND
SAY YOU ARE DOING SURVEILLANCE,
INTERCEPTING PHONE CALLS OF
SOMEONE WORKING FOR THE COUNTRY
AS OPPOSED TO AGAINST THE
COUNTRY, IT WOULD'VE BEEN NICE
IF HE HAD SPOKEN UP.
HE ALSO DENIED IN A
CONGRESSIONAL HEARING THAT THE
DOSSIER WAS USED IN ANY COURT
PLEADING.
THOSE OF THE MORAL AUTHORITIES
THE LEFT ARE CITING.
>> Martha: ANOTHER QUESTION I
WOULD HAVE FOR JIM COMEY,
CHRIS WALLACE IS GOING TO DO A
GREAT INTERVIEW.
HE WILL SPEAK WITH HIM THIS
WEEKEND, THE WHOLE QUESTION OF
PRESIDENT TRUMP AS THE SUBJECT
OF THEIR INVESTIGATION BECAUSE
ONE OF THE THINGS WE HAVE SPOKEN
A LOT ABOUT IS THE FACT THAT THE
PRESIDENT WAS NEVER GIVEN A
HEADS UP, NOT GIVEN BRIEFING.
THE FBI SAYS WE DID BUT IT WAS
REALLY GENERAL.
THEY WEREN'T TELLING HIM THAT
THEY WERE ACTUALLY CONCERNED
THAT THERE IS PEOPLE IN THE
CAMPAIGN THAT MIGHT BE A
PROBLEM.
NOW THEY ARE SAYING THE REASON
WE DIDN'T TELL CANDIDATE TRUMP
WHEN WE BRIEFED HIM WAS BECAUSE
ESSENTIALLY WE THOUGHT HE WAS
THE SUBJECT OF THE
INVESTIGATION.
JAMES COMEY TOLD HIM THREE TIMES
HE WAS NOT THE SUBJECT OF THE
INVESTIGATION.
>> ONLY WENT TO THE DOJ AND
ASKED THAT VERY QUESTION, YOU
GIVE A DEFENSIVE REEF INTO
CANDIDATE CLINTON.
DID YOU GIVE A DEFENSIVE
BRIEFING TO CANDIDATE TRUMP?
THE FSX DONATION WAS YES WE GAVE
ONE TO CANDIDATE TRUMP BECAUSE
THE TARGET OF THE INVESTIGATION,
IN THIS CASE, MICHAEL FLYNN WAS
SITTING RIGHT BESIDE HIM, WE
COULDN'T GIVE HIM THE
EXHAUSTIVE BRIEFING WE WANTED.
THE FOLLOW-UP QUESTION IS THE
NEXT DAY WHEN YOU CALLED THEM
AND SAID HE WILL WANT TO MEET
WITH YOU ALONE OR BETTER YET
YOUR FORMER UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY CHRIS CHRISTIE, WE
WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO HIM, WHAT
WAS THE RESPONSE?
THEY NEVER WENT BACK.
>> Martha: THEY CLEARLY DIDN'T
WANT HIM TO KNOW.
>> IT IS WORSE THAN THAT.
THEY SENT NOT A DEBRIEFING