>>> WELCOME TO THE SHOW.
I'M MEHDI HASAN.
ALL EYES THIS MONTH HAVE BEEN
ON CAPITOL HILL, ON THE
DEMOCRATS' SURPRISINGLY STRONG
SHOWING, HOLDING THIS AND IT IS
THE REPUBLICANS PREPARE TO TAKE
THE HOUSE WITH A RAZOR THIN
MAJORITY.
BUT, WHEN WE FOCUSED ON THE
MIDTERM ELECTIONS, SOME OF THE
MOST POWERFUL AND ELECTED
OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON WERE
YUKKING IT UP.
YOU KNOW THE FEDERALIST
SOCIETY, THAT WELL-FINANCED
NETWORKING GROUP OF
CONSERVATIVE LAWYERS THAT HAVE HELPED SUCCESSIVE REPUBLICAN
HELPED SUCCESSIVE REPUBLICAN
PRESIDENTS STUFF THE JUDICIARY
WITH FELLOW RIGHT-WING
IDEOLOGUES.
LAST THURSDAY, THEY CELEBRATED
SOME OF THEIR OWN ON THE
SUPREME COURT.
JUSTICES BRETT KAVANAUGH AND
NEIL GORSUCH WERE THERE AS WAS SAMUEL ALITO. HIS DECISION
SAMUEL ALITO. HIS DECISION
OVERTURNING A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO
GET AN ABORTION.
HE GAVE A SPEECH AND GOT A
STANDING OVATION.
MORE ON THAT IN A MOMENT, BUT
IT WAS A NEAT CONANT BARRETT WHO GOT THE BIGGEST CHAIRS AND
WHO GOT THE BIGGEST CHAIRS AND
THE LAUGHS.
HILARIOUS MOCKING PEACEFUL
PROTESTERS WHO PROTESTED THE
COURT'S REVERSAL OF ROE V. WADE.
NO WONDER THE CONFIDENCE IN THE
ONCE RESPECTED SUPREME COURT
HAS HAD ALL-TIME LOWS. THIS
YEAR IT IS A STATE OF AFFAIRS
THAT LED ALITO TO TELL THE WALL
STREET JOURNAL IN DECEMBER THAT
WHILE IT WAS FAIR TO DISAGREE
WITH THE NATION'S HIGHEST COURT
BUT SAYING THE COURT IS
BECOMING AN ILLEGITIMATE
INSTITUTION, QUESTION OUR
INTEGRITY CROSSES AN IMPORTANT
LINE.
WHILE, NO. YOU KNOW WHAT CROSSES AN IMPORTANT LINE?
CROSSES AN IMPORTANT LINE?
ADJUST A JUDGE GIVING AWAY A
DECISION TO A SUPREME COURT
CASE OVER DINNER WELL BEFORE
THE DECISION WAS MADE PUBLIC.
THAT IS IN THE NEW YORK TIMES
BASED ON A RECENT LETTER. IN THE LETTER, ROB SHANK SAYS HE
THE LETTER, ROB SHANK SAYS HE
LEARNED OF THE COURTS 2014
HOBBY LOBBY CASE WEEKS BEFORE
IT WAS ANNOUNCED.
HE TOLD THE TIMES HE HAD WORKED
FOR YEARS TO EXPLOIT THE COURTS
PERMEABILITY.
HE GAINED ACCESS THROUGH FAVORS
WITH GATEKEEPERS.
TWO STAR DONORS SHARED A MERE A MEAL WITH JUSTICE ALITO AND HIS
MEAL WITH JUSTICE ALITO AND HIS WIFE, AND, IN 2014.
WIFE, AND, IN 2014.
ROB, IF YOU WANT SOME
INTERESTING NEWS, PLEASE CALL.
NO EMAIL.
SHANKS TOLD HIM THE DECISION
WOULD BE FAVORABLE TO HOBBY
LOBBY AND THAT JUSTICE ALITO
HAD WRITTEN THE MAJORITY
OPINION.
THREE WEEKS LATER, THAT IS
EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.
THE SUPREME COURT RULED 5-4
THAN THE HOBBY LOBBY CASE
REQUIRING FAMILY OWNED
CORPORATIONS TO PAY FOR
INSURANCE COVERING CONTRACEPTION VIOLATED THEIR
CONTRACEPTION VIOLATED THEIR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
HE GOT A HEADS UP FROM THE
COURT AND A CHANCE FOR THE
ORGANIZATION TO PREPARE ITS
PUBLIC RELATIONS PUSH FOR THE
EVENTUAL DECISION.
THE TIME SAY THEY REVIEWED
MULTIPLE EMAILS FROM SHANK,
SHOWING HE HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
OF THE DECISION AND ACTED UPON
IT.
HE NOW TELLS THE TIMES HE
REGRETS HIS ROLE IN THIS
POLITICAL INTRIGUE.
WHAT WE DID, HE SAID, WAS
WRONG.
FOR GAIL WRIGHT, THE DONOR WHO
HAD DINNER WITH ALITO, DENIED TO THE TIMES THAT ALITO TOLD
TO THE TIMES THAT ALITO TOLD
HER THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE.
THROUGH A SUPREME COURT
SPOKESWOMAN, JUSTICE ALITO
HIMSELF CONFIRMED THAT HE AND
HIS WIFE SHARED A CASUAL AND
PURELY SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH
THE RIGHT AND HE CONFIRMED THEY
HAD THAT JUNE DINNER BUT ALITO
ADDED THE ALLEGATION THAT THE
RIGHTS WERE TOLD THE OUTCOME OF
THE HOBBY LOBBY DECISION IS
COMPLETELY FALSE. PERHAPS THAT'S TRUE.
PERHAPS THAT'S TRUE.
THAT IS PERHAPS THE APPEARANCE
OF IMPROPRIETY COULD HAVE BEEN
AVOIDED IF ALITO DID NOT HAVE
SOCIAL DINNERS WITH ACTIVISTS
WHO HAVE A STAKE IN THE COURTS
STANDING ENGAGEMENTS.
REMEMBER, THE REASON THIS EVEN
CAME TO LIGHT AS THE SUPREME
COURT WAS INVESTIGATED LAST
WEEK REGARDING THE DECISION TO
OVERTURN ROE V. WADE.
REMEMBER THAT WHILE FOX AND CO.
WENT CRAZY ACCUSING LIBERALS ON
THE COURT OF LEAKING THAT DRAFT
DECISION, THERE WAS ACTUALLY A
SCHOOL OF THOUGHT THAT SAID
THAT WE COULD HAVE COME FROM A
CONSERVATIVELY WORKING IN THE
COURT BECAUSE IT MADE IT NEARLY
IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE CONSERVATIVE
JUSTICES TO THEM CHANGE THEIR
VOTES.
BY THE WAY, WHERE IS CHIEF
JUSTICE'S INVESTIGATION INTO THAT DOBBS LEAK, THE
THAT DOBBS LEAK, THE
INVESTIGATION THAT IT PROMISED
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE LIQUOR
AND WOULD RESTORE THE COURT'S
LEGITIMACY.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT?
TODAY AFTER THE NEW YORK TIMES
REPORT MANY LAWMAKERS ON
CAPITOL HILL ARE ASKING THE
SAME THING, WARNING THE COURT
THE CONGRESS MAY STEP IN TO
INVESTIGATE.
IF THE JUSTICES ARE WORRIED
ABOUT BEING CALLED
ILLEGITIMATE, MAYBE THEY SHOULD
STOP DOING THINGS THAT MAKE
THEM LOOK ILLEGITIMATE.
IT IS NOT JUST ALITO.
LOOK AT THE WILD RIGHT OF
JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS WHOSE
WIFE SUPPORTED EFFORTS TO
OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION AND
ATTENDED THE JANUARY 6th RALLY
IN WASHINGTON, D.C. LAST
JANUARY, THOMAS WAS THE LONE
JUSTICE TO BACK TRUMPS WITHHOLDING DOCUMENTS FROM THE
WITHHOLDING DOCUMENTS FROM THE
JANUARY 6th COMMITTEE.
THIS WEEK, THOMAS IS ONE OF
ONLY TWO JUSTICES WHO VOTED
AGAINST THE SUBPOENA OF ARIZONA
GOP CHAIRWOMAN'S PHONE MESSES
AS AS PART OF A PROBE INTO
TRUMPS FAKE ELECTRIC PLAN, A
PLAN SUPPORTED BY THOMAS'S
WIFE, GINNIE.
HE IS OUT THERE SHOWING HIS
TRUE COLORS. THIS IS WHAT YOU
GET WHEN YOU HAVE A SUPREME
COURT THAT HAS BEEN DOMINATED
BY CONSERVATIVES FOR MORE THAN
A HALF A CENTURY WITH ZERO
ACCOUNTABILITY.
A CONSERVATIVE COURT WHERE THE
JUSTICES LAUGH ABOUT THEIR MOST
CONTROVERSIAL DECISIONS WITH
RIGHT-WING IDEOLOGUES HAD A
BLACK TIE DINNER.
WHERE JUSTICES ACCUSED OF
LEAKING A DECISION TO RIGHT- WING DONORS AND WHERE THE 6-3
WING DONORS AND WHERE THE 6-3
TRUMP MAJORITY ALL BUT HANDED
REPUBLICANS THE HOUSE MAJORITY
AFTER LETTING RACIAL AND
PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING STAND
IN RED STATES AHEAD OF THIS
YEAR'S MIDTERM.
BUT HEY, DON'T YOU DARE
QUESTION THEIR LEGITIMACY.
JOINING ME NOW, BRIAN FALLON, COFOUNDER AND EXECUTIVE DRESSED
COFOUNDER AND EXECUTIVE DRESSED
HER DIRECTOR OF [INDISCERNIBLE]
BRIAN, HOW SHOCKED WERE YOU BY
THIS NEW YORK TIMES STORY OVER
THE WEEKEND?
>> CERTAINLY, THIS DETAIL ABOUT
SAMUEL ALITO POTENTIALLY BEING
INVOLVED IN THE LEAK OF THE
DECISION ON THE OPINION IN THE HOBBY LOBBY CASE IS NEW
HOBBY LOBBY CASE IS NEW INFORMATION.
THIS IS A GROUP --
>> BRIAN, WE JUST HAD A LITTLE
BIT OF A -- DO YOU WANT TO
REPEAT WHAT YOU SAID BECAUSE WE
JUST MISSED WHAT YOU SAID.
>> I WAS GOING TO SAY THE
LOBBYING CAMPAIGN REVEREND
SHANKS GROUP FACED IS NOT NEW. REALLY THE LARGER EFFORT TO
REALLY THE LARGER EFFORT TO
LOBBY THESE JUSTICES IS NOT NEW.
IT EXISTS TO CREATE AN
ECOSYSTEM APART FROM THE REST
OF THE COUNTRY, TO SOLIDIFY THE
SPIES OF THESE CONSERVATIVE
JUSTICES SO THAT THEY CAN DO
FAR-REACHING DECISIONS LIKE THE
DOBBS DECISION THAT OVERTURNED
ROE, AND EVEN THOUGH A DECISION
LIKE THAT CAN BE REJECTED BY
70% OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, THESE JUSTICES BEHIND THAT
THESE JUSTICES BEHIND THAT
OPINION CAN GO STAND UP IN TEXT
EGOS AT THIS DINNER AT THE
FEDERAL SOCIETY AND BE
APPLAUDED AS HEROES, SO THAT
DINNER IS REALLY REPRESENTATIVE
OF A FULL-TIME, YEAR AFTER YEAR
LOBBYING EFFORT THAT THE
FEDERAL SOCIETY IS ENGAGED IN
TO GIVE THESE JUSTICES THE AMMO
AND THE CONFIDENCE TO ISSUE
DECISIONS THAT ARE GOING TO BE
UNPOPULAR, OVERWHELMINGLY, WITH
THE PUBLIC, BUT THAT MAKE THEM
FEEL LIKE THEY'RE DOING THE
RIGHT THING WITH THESE HARD- CORE PARTISAN PEOPLE THAT
CORE PARTISAN PEOPLE THAT
ATTEND DINNERS.
AND SO, THIS JUST GOES TO SHOW
THE NEED FOR FUNDAMENTAL ETHICS REFORM AND COMPLETE OVERHAULING
REFORM AND COMPLETE OVERHAULING OF THE JUST JUDICIAL
OF THE JUST JUDICIAL BRANCH.
THE SUPREME COURT CONSERVATIVE
JUSTICES ARE AT THIS POINT IT
HAS BEEN PRETTY WELL EXPOSED,
JUST PARTISAN POLITICIANS AND
ROGUES.
THIS REPORT FROM THE NEW YORK
TIMES IS JUST THE LATEST
EVIDENCE OF THAT.
>> IT IS A VERY GOOD POINT YOU
MAKE ABOUT STRENGTHENING THEIR
SPINES ON THE RIGHT.
THIS IS A BIG REVELATION FROM
REVEREND SHANK AFTER BREAKING
WITH THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT.
HE ARRANGED FOR 20 PEOPLE TO
FLY TO WASHINGTON AND BE ENTERTAINED.
HE WAS CUT BRAGGING THAT HER LOG
LOBBY GROUP PRAISE WITH
CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES.
THE COURT SEEMS TO HAVE WAY TOO
MANY SOCIAL TIES WITH PEOPLE
WHO HAVE BUSINESS EITHER
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BEFORE THEM.
HOW IS THAT APPROPRIATE?
>> IT'S NOT, BUT THERE IS NO
PROFESSIONAL OR LEGAL
CONSEQUENCE FOR BEHAVING THAT
WAY.
OBVIOUSLY, ALITO NOT ONLY IS
PALLING AROUND WITH REVEREND
SHANK IN THESE VERY HARD-CORE
RIGHT-WING CONSERVATIVE GROUPS THAT ARE VERY WEALTHY, HIS
THAT ARE VERY WEALTHY, HIS
PATRONS, IF YOU WILL, BUT HE'S
BEEN PALLING AROUND WITH ALL
THESE PEOPLE.
HE IS TO KEEP HIS SOCIAL LIFE A
LITTLE BIT MORE QUIET, BUT NOW
WITH THIS CONSERVATIVE
MAJORITY, I THINK HE HAS BEEN
REALLY EMBOLDENED TO TAKE
FURTHER STEPS INTO THE
POLITICAL ARENA WHERE AS MAY BE
IN THE PAST HE FELT LIKE HE
NEEDED TO SNEAK AROUND A LITTLE
BIT MORE BUT THAT HAS BEEN EVIDENCED BY THE FACT HE SPENT
EVIDENCED BY THE FACT HE SPENT
THE WHOLE SUMMER GOING ON THIS
SORE WINNER TO HER.
HE WENT TO ITALY AND COMPLAINED
ABOUT BORIS JOHNSON AND FOREIGN
LEADERS WHO GAVE HIM A HARD
TIME.
HE HAS BEEN GIVING SPEECHES
BASICALLY INVITING SO-CALLED
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CHALLENGES. HE HAS BEEN KNOWN TO INVITE
HE HAS BEEN KNOWN TO INVITE
MORE AND MORE EXTREME
CONSERVATIVE CHALLENGES TO LAWS
HE DOESN'T LIKE.
HE'S DONE IT WITH LABOR LAW.
HE IS DOING IT WITH RELIGIOUS
FREEDOM.
HE HAS DONE IT ON DEMOCRACY SO
IS NOT A PARTICULARLY GOOD
PERSON, WHO IS NOW EMBOLDENED
WITH NO CONSEQUENCES FOR HIS
BEHAVIOR, AND HERE WE FIND
OURSELVES JUST A COUPLE MONTHS AGO AFTER THE DOBBS DECISION,
AGO AFTER THE DOBBS DECISION,
THIS IS A GRAVE BETRAYAL FOR
WHOEVER LEAKED THIS.
MEANWHILE, HE'S BEEN PALLING
AROUND AND APPARENTLY DOING
THIS FOR YEARS, LEAKING
CONFIDENTIAL DECISIONS AND
STUFF TO HIS FRIENDS.
>> I'M REMINDED OF WHAT DOES
THAT MEAN IT'S COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE.
INSIDE THE HOUSE.
WHERE IS THAT LEAK COMING FROM? WHAT ARE THE DEMOCRATS GOING TO
WHAT ARE THE DEMOCRATS GOING TO
DO ABOUT THE PROBLEM?
THEY HAVE BACKED OFF ON COURT
EXPANSION.
WHERE ARE THE CALLS FOR
IMPEACHMENT OF CLARENCE THOMAS?
THE DEMOCRATS ASKED HIM NICELY,
RECRUIT YOU RECUSE YOURSELF.
THEY IGNORED HIM. WHY NOT IMPEACH THEM WHILE THEY
WHY NOT IMPEACH THEM WHILE THEY
CONTROLLED BOTH BRANCHES.
SAMUEL ALITO HAS BEEN ACCUSED
OF SOME GRAVE ETHICAL BREACHES.
WHERE ARE THE DEMOCRATS ON
THIS?
>> I CERTAINLY THINK CALLS FOR
IMPEACHMENT ARE NOT
INAPPROPRIATE AT THIS POINT AND
I THINK CALLS LIKE THIS MAKE
THE CASE FOR REFORMING THE
SUPREME COURT BUT IF YOU ARE
[INDISCERNIBLE]
IN THE HOUSE THAT YOU DON'T
SUPPORT THESE THINGS.
IF YOUR DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE, WHY NOT ARRANGE FOR
HOUSE, WHY NOT ARRANGE FOR
REVEREND SHANK TO COME TESTIFY
IN AN OPEN HEARING?
HE CERTAINLY SEEMS WILLING TO
BLOW THE WHISTLE ON THE
LOBBYING EFFORTS HE HELPED
SPEAR FOR YEARS IN FRONT OF THE
COURT.
HE HAS NOW SENT A LETTER TO
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS.
HE HAS BEEN WILLING TO SPEAK TO
THE MEDIA.
CAN'T IMAGINE WHY HE WOULD NOT
BE WILLING TO TELL HIS STORY TO
CONGRESS IN PUBLIC. WE'RE GOING TO LOSE THE HOUSE
WE'RE GOING TO LOSE THE HOUSE IN JANUARY BUT
IN JANUARY BUT A SUBCOMMITTEE
COULD HOLD HEARINGS, AND THIS
IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO TELL A
STORY TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE
POLITICIZATION IN THE SUPREME
COURT.
EVEN IF IT IS NOT GOING TO
IMPEACH A JUSTICE OR PRODUCE
PASSAGE OF STRUCTURAL REFORM,
RIGHT NOW, THESE CONSERVATIVE
JUSTICES ARE FEELING THEIR OATS.
THEY ARE IDEOLOGICALLY THE
EQUIVALENT OF MATT GATES OR JIM
JORDAN IN THE HOUSE.
REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE ARE
OVERPLAYING THEIR HAND AND
DEMOCRATS HAVE COME TO LEARN
THAT.
I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO PLAY
OVERPLAYED HER HAND WITH HOW
THEY EXERCISE THEIR OVERSIGHT
CAPACITY IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS.
YOU HAVE JUSTICES LIKE ALITO
AND CLARENCE THOMAS THAT ARE
IDEOLOGICALLY FRINGE AND GIVING
PURELY PARTISAN SPEECHES AND
DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE ABLE TO
HOLD UP A MIRROR TO THAT.
IT WILL HELP US MAKE THE CASE
FOR THESE BIGGER STRUCTURAL
REFORM EFFORTS.
>> I CANNOT IMAGINE THE REACTION FROM THE RIGHT WITH
REACTION FROM THE RIGHT WITH
SOME OF THE LIBERAL JUSTICES
GIVING SOME OF THE POLITICALLY
CHARGED SPEECHES THAT ALITO AND
CO.
HAVE BEEN GIVING.
LONG-TERM, IS IT A GOOD THING
OR BAD THING THAT SCOTUS LOSES
ITS LEGITIMACY? ON THE ONE HAND IT'S SUPPOSED
ON THE ONE HAND IT'S SUPPOSED
TO BE THIS NEUTRAL, RESPECTED
INSTITUTION.
ON THE OTHER HAND, IT IS
CLEARLY POLITICIZED AND THE
ONLY WAY TO REFORM IT IS TO
REALLY HAVE IT LOSE ITS
PRESTIGE IN THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC.
>> EXISTENTIALLY, IT IS BAD.
WHILE THE SUPREME COURT IS
LOSING ITS LEGITIMACY, THEY ARE
LOSING IT BECAUSE THEY'RE DOING
BAD THINGS.
THEY ARE HURTING PEOPLE.
THIS DOBBS DECISION IS A REALLY
GREAT EXAMPLE OF THAT. THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING
THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING
BIRTH TO NONVIABLE PREGNANCIES.
THEY CAN'T GET ABORTIONS UNLESS
THEY COME CLOSE ENOUGH TO DEATH
THAT HOSPITAL LAWYERS ALLOWING
THEM TO HAVE AN ABORTION.
THAT IS WHAT THE SUPREME COURT
IS ABOUT SO IN THE SHORT TERM
IT IS VERY SCARY.
IN THE LONG-TERM THEY ARE OVERPLAYING THEIR HAND BUT IF
OVERPLAYING THEIR HAND BUT IF
THERE IS ANY SILVER LINING
HERE, IT IS THAT TO THE EXTENT
THAT THEY NEVER PAID ATTENTION
TO THE SUPREME COURT BEFORE,
THEY ARE NOW, BECAUSE THEY'RE
DOING TOO MUCH AND THEY ARE
BEING TOO SCARY, SO THAT IS WHY I THINK THIS MIDTERM ELECTION
I THINK THIS MIDTERM ELECTION
IS NOT JUST A REJECTION OF MAGA
CONGRESSPEOPLE, IT WAS A REBUKE
OF THE MAGA JUSTICES ON THE
SUPREME COURT.
IN THE LONG TERM, IT IS
WORTHWHILE BECAUSE IT GETS
PEOPLE TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT
IS GOING ON WITH THE COURT AND
WHEN PEOPLE ARE UPSET, THEY WANT TO MAKE CHANGES TO THAT
WANT TO MAKE CHANGES TO THAT
SYSTEM.
>> BUT THE SUPREME COURT ITSELF
IS GOING TO GIVE ITS OWN REBUKE
TO DEMOCRACY, BRIAN, EVEN AS
ALL THIS INTRIGUE IS COMING TO
LIGHT, THIS COURT IS ABOUT TO
MAKE A MOMENTOUS DECISION AND
MORE V. HARPER NEXT MONTH. THERE ARGUING TO ENABLE RED
THERE ARGUING TO ENABLE RED
STATE LEGISLATORS TO OVERTURN
ELECTION RESULTS AND THEY DON'T
LIKE WITHOUT ANY GOVERNOR OR
STATE SUPREME COURT GETTING IN
THE WAY.
IF THIS COURT AGREES, AND WE
KNOW THAT ALITO AND OTHERS HAVE
BEEN NUDGING AND WINKING THAT
THEY WILL, WHERE WILL THAT
LEAVE DEMOCRACY COME 2024?
>> THIS IS THE ISSUE WITH WHY
THE SUPREME COURT MATTERS. FREQUENTLY IN THE AFTERMATH OF
FREQUENTLY IN THE AFTERMATH OF
A BAD DECISION, WE EVEN SAW
SOME OF IT IN RESPONSE TO THE
DOBBS DECISION, YOU SEE WELL-
MEANING DEMOCRATIC POLITICIANS
COME FORWARD AND SAY THE ANSWER
TO THIS IS TO VOTE.
LET'S GO REGISTER MORE VOTERS, AND THAT IS SUFFICIENT BUT NOT
AND THAT IS SUFFICIENT BUT NOT
NECESSARY, AND THE REASON WHY
-- IT IS NECESSARY BUT NOT
SUFFICIENT I SHOULD SAY.
THE REASON IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT
AS ONE OF THE PROJECTS THE
SUPREME COURT IS -BENT ON
SEEING THROUGH IS ENSURING THAT
REPUBLICANS NEVER LOSE ANOTHER
ELECTION.
PART OF THE REASON WHY THE
REPUBLICANS WERE ABLE TO FLIP
THE HOUSES THAT THEY WERE AIDED
BY RULINGS FROM THE SUPREME
COURT, ESPECIALLY IN DISTRICTS
THAT SHOULD'VE BEEN REDISTRICT
YOU TO HAVE BLACK
REPRESENTATION AND THE SUPREME
COURT DECIDED IT WAS GOING TO
LEAVE THOSE GERRYMANDERED MAPS
AND PLACES FOR THE 2022
ELECTION AND THIS UPCOMING
WOULD BE AND ANOTHER
OPPORTUNITY TO ENSURE THAT MAGA JUSTICES HAVE THE ABILITY TO
JUSTICES HAVE THE ABILITY TO