NOW.
TONIGHT, IT IS TIME THE
AMERICAN PUBLIC KNOW THE TRUTH.
THE LAST TWO YEARS MAY SOON
PROVE TO BE A KIND OF WATERGATE
ON STEROIDS, REALLY.
A MASSIVE ABUSE OF POWER WITHIN
THE SO-CALLED DEEP STATE
BECAUSE WHY?
THE ESTABLISHMENT DID NOT LIKE
SOMEONE.
THEY DID NOT LIKE DONALD J
TRUMP.
THE NOW PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA.
AMERICANS MUST DEMAND ANSWERS
ON THIS.
MANY HIGHER-UPS IN THE PREVIOUS
OBAMA DEMONSTRATION ATTEMPTED
TO MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.
MISLEAD US BY MAKING THESE WILD
ACCUSATIONS WITH THE FORMER
HEAD OF THE CIA UNDER OBAMA
LEADING THE PACK.
SUGGESTING THAT THE PRESIDENT
HIMSELF WAS AN AGENT OF RUSSIA.
THE STORY NEVER ADDED UP.
AND I HAVE HEARD OVER THE LAST
TWO YEARS, IT NEVER ADDED UP
THEN AND IT CERTAINLY DOES NOT
ADD UP NOW.
WE HAVE NOW THE INFORMATION,
THE INFORMATION GATHERING OF
THE MUELLER REPORT AND WE NOW
KNOW, THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO
COLLUSION.
SO WHY THE HECK WERE BRENNAN
AND KLAPPER AND McCAIN AND ALL
OF OBAMA 'S TOP INTEL PEOPLE
TRYING TO TELL US THAT THERE
WAS POLITICS.THAT MY FRIEND
IS EXACTLY WHY THIS SO-CALLED
RUSSIAN COLLISION ISSUE WILL GO
DOWN IN HISTORY BOOKS.
AS ONE OF THE VERY WORST
SCANDALS IN MODERN TIMES.
SO TONIGHT, WE HEAR ON THIS
SHOW, BY ASKING QUESTIONS.
WE MUST KNOW WHY THERE WAS A
MASSIVE OVERREACH.
WHY THERE WAS A SO-CALLED
INSURANCE POLICY AND WHY AND
HOW THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO
UNSEAT A SITTING PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
I MEAN IT WAS REALLY WILD WHEN
YOU THINK ABOUT IT, RIGHT?
IN READING THAT REPORT, AND I
READ EVERY PAGE OF IT, A VERY
BUSY EASTER WEEKEND.
IN READING THE REPORT I WOULD
SAY WAS CLEAR TO ME, WHAT WAS
CLEAR WAS THAT RUSSIA TRIED TO
INTERVENE.
AND THEY DID.
THEY REPEATEDLY ATTEMPTED TO
REACH OUT TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN
BUT ON THAT WHEN THEY COULDN'T
GET TO FIRST BASE.
TO BE CLEAR, THEY ALREADY HAD
-- IN CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN
MACHINE.
THE SECOND THING, THE PRESIDENT
DID NOT COLLUDE NOR DID ANYONE
IN THE CAMPAIGN COLLUDE.
WHILE HE MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLY
UPSET UNDERSTANDABLY BY THE
RHETORIC USED BY THE MEDIA AND
THE DEEP STATE TYPES, THAT IS
KIND OF WHAT YOU CALL NORMAL
HUMAN REACTION, RIGHT?
WHEN SOMEONE SAYS YOU ARE
GUILTY OF THIS AND YOU SAY WAIT
A SECOND, I'M NOT.
I PROMISE YOU I AM NOT.
AND YOU ARE TRYING TO PROVE
THAT YOU ARE NOT WHEN THERE'S
NO TIME TO BEGIN WITH.
HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU GUILTY
OF ANYTHING?TONIGHT I WILL
TELL YOU THIS, THE TABLES HAVE
TURNED.IT IS NOW TIME FOR
PRESIDENT TRUMP TO DEMAND THE
ANSWER.
HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY AND
THEN SOME.
JOIN ME RIGHT NOW AS WE TRY TO
GET TO THE BOTTOM OF ALL THIS,
FORMER FBI SPECIAL AGENT BOBBY
CICCONE AND FORMER FEDERAL
PROSECUTOR, DOUG BURNS.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS FROM A
LEGAL PERSPECTIVE.
DOUG, WHERE THE OUT OF BOUNDS?
>> I'M A LEGAL PURIST, OKAY?
WE WENT THROUGH TWO YEARS
EVERY NIGHT SAYING THIS IS
DEFINITELY A CRIME THEY WILL
INVITE FAMILY MEMBERS, THERE
MAY BE SEALED INDICTMENTS.
THERE HAS TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY
WE CANNOT JUST PIVOT TO THE
NEXT TOPIC.
TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, IS A
TOTALLY LEGITIMATE INQUIRY NOW
THAT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL CAME
BACK AND SAID NO, THERE WASN'T
A CRIME.
BUT HE WROTE THIS NOVEL FOR 200
PAGES ABOUT OBSTRUCTING
SOMETHING THAT IS NOT A CRIME.
AND HOW IT SOUNDS HIGHLY
EDITORIAL BUT IT SHOULD BE.
TRISH: YOU ARE THE NOR I AM
NOT.
BUT I KNOW A LOT OF LAWYERS AND
-- HE SAID HE HAD A RIGHT TO
DECIDE INNOCENCE OR GUILT.
HIS ONLY JOB WAS TO DECIDE
WHETHER OR NOT HE HAD ENOUGH
EVIDENCE TO PROVE OBSTRUCTION.
>> MY COLLEAGUE IS BETTER THAN
ME AS AN AGENT.
THE POINT IS WHEN A CASE IS
DECLINED, HE FOLDED THE FILE,
PUT IN THE CABINET AND MOVE
ONTO THE NEXT CASE.
POLITICALLY THOUGH, JIM,
THROUGH HILLARY CLINTON UNDER
THE BUS, SHE DID THIS THAT AND
THE OTHER THING WRONG SO IT
BECAME PAYBACK.
TRISH: YOU KNOW WHAT,
POLITICALLY I WILL TELL YOU
WHAT, BOBBY, THE PRESIDENT GIVE
HILLARY CLINTON A PASS BECAUSE
HE COULD'VE OPENED UP ALL OF
THOSE FILES.THERE IS PLENTY
OF INFORMATION ON HER.AND THE
FBI INVESTIGATION INTO HER
EMAIL.
THERE IS 37 PAGES THAT HAD BEEN
REDACTED ON THE WHOLE THING.
SO IF THERE IS A TIT-FOR-TAT
GOING ON, THERE'S A LOT THAT
CAN HAPPEN THERE SHALL WE SAY.
BUT BOBBY, I JUST CARE ABOUT
WHY ON EARTH, THIS ALL HAPPENED
TO BEGIN WITH AND I DON'T LIKE
THE IDEA THAT THE SO-CALLED
DEEP STATE IS PLAYING POLITICS.
DOES THAT REALLY HAPPEN?>>
WELL, APPARENTLY IT HAPPENED IN
THIS CASE.
I DO NOT KNOW WHY IT TOOK YEARS
TO FIND OUT WHAT THEY KNEW VERY
EARLY ON.
THE FBI HAS TWO EXTERNAL MERGES
THAT WERE EFFECTIVE IN CASES.
THEY WIRED UP GEORGE
PAPADOPOULOS TO SEE IF THEY
COULD GET DIRT.
THEN THEY HAD A FISA, THREE
RENEWALS WITH CARTER PAGE AND
CAME AWAY WITH NOTHING.
THAT SHOWS THAT USING THE TWO
EXTERNAL MEETINGS WHICH BY THE
WAY ARE ONLY USED IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES, WE NORMALLY CAN
DEDICATE WITHOUT THOSE EXTERNAL
REMAINS BUT THEY WIRED UP A
GUY, THE SENTIMENT AND HAD A
SECRET LISTENING DEVICE AND
WERE LISTENING IN.
HE SAW NO EVIDENCE.
ONCE THOSE THINGS WERE SHUT
DOWN, THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE
END OF IT.THE FACT THAT IT
CONTINUED SHOWS YOU THIS WAS --
TRISH: LET ME ASK YOU THIS.
GIVEN YOUR FBI BACKGROUND, IF
YOU GOT A PIECE OF OPPOSITION
RESEARCH, KNOWING THAT IT WAS
PAID FOR BY POLITICAL OPPONENTS
OF THE PERSON THAT YOU MAY BE
INVESTIGATING, HOW DO YOU GET A
FISA WARRANT OUT OF THAT AND
HOW DO YOU NOT TELL THE JUDGE,
THIS IS PAID FOR BY THE
OPPOSITION.
I TRIPLE CHECK EVERYTHING AND
IF I'VE INFORMATION FROM --
DOESN'T THE FBI DO THE SAME
THING?
>> IS WHY COUNTERESPIONAGE AND
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE -- I WENT
FOR TITLE III AFFIDAVIT, THE
BALL WAS SO MUCH HIGHER, WHEN I
STOOD BEFORE THE JUDGE AND I
SWEAR TO AN AFFIDAVIT I HAD TO
SAY THE THINGS WERE TRUTHFUL
AND I HAVE TO DO