A portion of this video is brought to you by Surfshark.
As good as lithium-ion batteries are, they have their limitations and challenges,
but there’s also plenty of battery alternatives. Flow batteries alone have enough variations in
chemistry to make your head spin. Zinc-bromine batteries are one up-and-coming contender … and
calling them up and coming sounds funny when you consider that they’ve existed
for 137 years … but they might hold the future for energy storage. And for such an old idea, why now?
I’m Matt Ferrell … welcome to Undecided.
It’s no
question that developing efficient energy storage systems will make or break our progress in the
use of intermittent renewable energy. When it isn’t sunny enough to rely on solar or
windy enough to turn turbines, batteries full of previously-generated renewable energy can
keep grids going. When it’s bright and sunny or the wind is blowing, the opposite case, it can
store excess energy for when it’s needed most. Lithium-ion batteries are the reigning champion
in the chemical battery arena, but a 137-year old concept might be what knocks them out of the ring.
That’s because the use of lithium-based batteries is somewhat paradoxical in the
quest for sustainable energy. They’re great for electric vehicles, but recycling li-ion batteries
has historically been difficult and dangerous, though there are several companies working on
that problem. The process of mining lithium is also hugely disruptive to the environment,
requiring about 500,000 gallons of water for each metric ton produced.
Despite this, li-ion batteries continue to dominate the market due to their low
cost and high energy density. Yet the price of lithium is rising. In China,
one of the world’s largest producers of lithium, the cost of battery-grade
carbonate lithium increased by more than 700% between early 2021 and February 2022.
That doesn’t look good in light of the ubiquity of li-ion. Rising lithium prices also adds to
the challenge of producing even more energy-dense variations like lithium
metal and solid-state electrolyte batteries, the latter not even having hit the market yet.
There’s a clear need to mitigate our reliance upon lithium. And as the demand for EVs and renewable
energy storage increases, alternative types of batteries are gaining traction. It feels
like there’s a new one every week, but in this case … it’s an old one.
Two Australian companies, Gelion and Redflow, have stepped up to the plate
with zinc-bromine batteries that promise safer, more reliable, and more robust designs. In July,
Redflow began production of the third generation of its zinc-bromine flow battery, the ZBM3,
at its manufacturer in Thailand. In September, the company officially teamed up with Empower Energies
to bring their 10 kWh battery to North America. The same month, Gelion began producing Endure,
its non-flow zinc-bromide battery, using an existing lead-acid battery factory in Sydney.
So, what is it that gives zinc-bromine an edge over other types of battery chemistries?
Before we discuss the value of zinc-bromine batteries compared to their competitors,
let’s break down how they work. Zinc-bromine batteries are a form of redox-flow battery or RFB.
Like any kind of battery, RFBs contain a cathode, an anode, and a separator.
What distinguishes flow batteries from others is their use of tanks full of liquid
electrolyte on either side of the battery: one for catholyte, and one for anolyte,
instead of the solid components found in the batteries used currently. Each
side contains a chemical in a different oxidation state. A chamber between the
two tanks holds a cell stack, which is divided by an ion-selective membrane.
When you discharge a flow battery, the chemical energy stored inside it is converted into
electrical energy through reduction-oxidation (AKA “redox”). The ions in the anolyte oxidate,
or lose electrons. These electrons then move through the battery’s circuit and past the
membrane. On the other side, ions in the catholyte take these electrons,
reducing their oxidation state. As the battery charges, this process is reversed.
The typical RFB structure of tanks and pumps translates into a lot of bulk, so they’re most
appropriate for stationary applications. Think storage for an EV charging station,
not EV battery. They’re highly useful at the home or grid scale because of
the flexibility of their design. If you want more power, just add more stacks;
if you want more storage capacity, add more electrolytes and storage tanks.
But Gelion takes things a step further because of their unique approach. Before getting to that,
I’d like to thank Surfshark for sponsoring this portion of today's video. I always
recommend using a VPN when using public Wifi, but VPNs can be very useful even
when you’re home. A lot of online services use some pretty sophisticated commercial
tracking and machine learning to apply very targeted advertising ... a VPN can
protect you from some of that. SurfShark’s CleanWeb does a great job blocking ads,
trackers, and malicious websites making it safer to use the internet even at home.
And you can even make it look like your IP address
is coming from a completely different country. This can come in handy if you
want to stream a video that’s only available from a specific location.
One of the best parts of SurfShark is that it’s easy to set up on all your devices,
whether that’s iPhone or Android, Mac or PC. SurfShark is the only VPN
to offer one account to use with an unlimited number of devices.
Use my code to get 85% off plus 3 extra months for free. SurfShark offers a 30-day money-back
guarantee, so there’s no risk to try it out for yourself. Link is in the description below.
Thanks to Surfshark and to all of you for supporting the channel. Now back to Gelion.
Gelion takes things a step further, because their battery, the Endure, isn’t a RFB. Instead,
it uses the same plate format and style of casing as a lead-acid battery. The difference
is that it swaps lead and sulphuric acid for a bromide-positive plate and a zinc-negative plate,
with a layer of gel acting as the electrode in the middle. The “gel”
in “Gelion” refers to the gel-based, rather than liquid-based, electrolytes.
This means that unlike RFBs, the Endure doesn’t use pumps or tanks,
allowing for a much more compact design. The plate design not only saves space, but eliminates the
need for specialized maintenance, an auxiliary power source, and a secondary backup system.
The chemical reaction inside, though, remains the same. When the battery charges, zinc ions move
to the negative electrode, accept electrons, and reduce to zinc. Bromide ions move to the
positive electrode, lose electrons, and oxidizes to bromine. The reverse happens upon discharge.
A major benefit of flow batteries (and the Endure) is their depth of discharge. It’s
possible to discharge flow batteries, including those produced by Redflow,
all the way down to zero without damaging them. In contrast, some forms of lithium-ion batteries have
an inherent limitation on their capacity, because they tend to degrade when discharged to below 20%.
RFBs also have crucial advantages over li-ion in the realm of safety. Lithium-ion batteries
require careful management to avoid failures that can spell disaster. When mishandled,
damaged, or overheated, they’re prone to thermal runaway, which can cause fires. They’re also,
well, known for exploding. Fires caused by lithium-ion batteries are especially
dangerous because they’re difficult to put out and can even re-ignite.
To put this into perspective, last year a Tesla lithium-ion battery pack caught fire
during testing at the Victoria Big Battery in Australia. It burned for
three days. Another Tesla Megapack energy storage system, this time in California,
caught fire last September. Like the fire in Australia, nearby residents were warned
to shut their windows to protect themselves from the smoke, which is full of toxic gases.
While these events are rare and lithium-ion batteries are generally very safe,
when things go wrong there are serious safety concerns. Flow
batteries solve this problem by using non-flammable elements and water-based
electrolytes rather than organic ones. This greatly reduces the chances of fire.
As of right now, vanadium RFBs are the most popular, but there’s no shortage of chemistries
to choose from, like all-iron, uranium, or even copper. That said, zinc-bromine is probably the
oldest of the bunch by a wide margin. The concept of a zinc-bromine battery was first patented by
a New Yorker named C.S. Bradley all the way back in 1885. So, why are they relevant now?
For one, the incredible simplicity. Another, bromine is a natural fire retardant − an appealing
quality when considering the instability of some lithium chemistries. Gelion claims
that its bromine gel can "substantially moderate or even extinguish a fire.”
Still, other flow batteries can also provide a low fire risk, with vanadium also having a leg
up in its unique qualities. Vanadium can exist in multiple oxidation states, and a study published
by the U.S. Department of Energy last month notes that VRFBs have a virtually unlimited cycle life.
We actually covered a new vanadium redox flow battery chemistry in a recent video.
Even so, for all its usefulness, vanadium comes with its own set of weaknesses. Cost is a big
one. The metal itself, which is mostly used to strengthen and toughen steel alloys, is known for
its price volatility. In contrast, the components of zinc-bromine batteries are significantly
cheaper. Most of the earth’s bromine is found in ocean water, so we’re literally swimming in it.
It’s easy to “sea” how big of a difference that makes. A 2017 study estimated that the chemical
cost of storage for a vanadium RFB is about $124.4/kWh. That’s about 15
and a half times more expensive than the cost of a zinc-bromine system at $8/kWh.
More recently, a 2021 study examined the materials cost associated with vanadium,
zinc-bromine, and all-iron batteries. Among the three,
zinc-bromine batteries won out as the cheapest at $153/kWh, far lower than vanadium’s $491/kWh.
Researchers also investigated the impacts of each type of battery on human and environmental health,
revealing another issue with VRFBs: toxicity. Vanadium oxides are highly toxic, and as a result,
VRFB production involves a higher potential for human health hazards relative to zinc-bromine.
Vanadium is also dissolved into sulphuric acid,
which is corrosive and hazardous to both people and the environment. But just to call this out,
all those issues can and are addressed through proper engineering and design.
These results don’t mean zinc-bromine gets off scot-free from a safety perspective. Bromine
still poses a risk to human health in electrolyte form due to its carcinogenic nature. Nevertheless,
Sandia National Laboratories argues that the chemical reactivity and evaporation
rate of the bromine contained in electrolyte is much lower than
pure bromine – and the chemical smells so bad that a spill would be noticed quickly.
Sure, zinc-bromine may beat vanadium in terms of cost and relative environmental
impact. But does it stink in comparison to li-ion?
To be clear, zinc-bromine batteries are definitely not as energy-dense. On a grid scale,
Gelion’s batteries’ have an energy density of 120 Wh/kg. And Redflow’s Systems Integration
Architect, Simon Hackett, explained in a 2021 presentation that the company’s batteries are
“more energy-dense than lead-acid, but much less energy-dense than lithium.”
When it comes to round-trip efficiency, though, zinc-bromine batteries can potentially compete
with li-ion. Gelion’s Endure battery has a RTE of about 85 to 90%. This is comparable to the 82
to 90% RTE for li-ion batteries reported in a U.S. Department of Energy study published in September.
That study, which assessed the cost and performance of grid energy storage tech,
also points to the ways in which the capital cost of zinc-bromine batteries can be less expensive
than either li-ion or vanadium. In the case of a 10 MW battery storing energy for four hours,
li-ion batteries are the cheapest when considering things like the
storage block itself, which includes the cost of battery modules, racks,
flow battery stacks, electrolyte, and tanks. Their HVAC and pipe systems are also cheaper.
However, both Gelion and Redflow claim that their zinc-bromine batteries don’t require
air conditioning in the first place. Gelion’s founder, Thomas Maschmeyer, told The Guardian
in 2021 that he predicted that their costs of operation would be 25% less than lithium’s
precisely because their batteries don’t require air conditioning or fire-suppression systems.
On top of that, the Endure battery doesn’t use tanks, either. There’s no fluid to hold.
As for the cost of systems integration, which involves shipping and installing the batteries,
the Department of Energy figures for lithium and vanadium range
between about $46 to $52/kWh. The cost of zinc-bromine is between $10 to $18/kWh.
And in other aspects, like the cost of engineering, construction equipment,
connecting to the grid, and transformers, zinc-bromine is also considerably cheaper.
Gelion claims that its approach to manufacturing drives down costs further. Typically,
a RFB requires a new production line. But the Endure’s casing is the same
kind used in lead-acid batteries, and 18 out of the 22 steps of its manufacturing
process can be completed within an existing lead-acid battery factory.
In a presentation given to investors earlier this year, Gelion estimated that it would cost about
$16 million to retrofit a lead-acid battery facility to produce 1Gwh of their batteries,
while building a new 1Gwh li-ion battery facility from scratch would cost about $130 million.
Zinc-bromine batteries last longer than lithium ones, too. This is partly because
of their durability and their depth of discharge, as with other flow batteries.
It’s also the case in the context of their cycle life. Department of Energy statistics
indicate that lithium phosphate batteries last for roughly 2,400 cycles, with lithium nickel
manganese cobalt batteries lasting for about 1,500 cycles. In contrast, zinc-bromine flow
batteries last for closer to 4,500 cycles, and zinc-bromine non-flow batteries last about 5,000.
Both Gelion and Redflow also emphasize the toughness of their batteries. Gelion calls the
Endure “abuse-tolerant” and, in one test, managed to keep it operating even as it was “smoking and
charring” atop a hotplate heated to 700 C. The two products boast similar levels of tolerance
to high temperatures, with the Endure’s upper limit being 50 C, and the ZBM3’s being 45 C.
It seems that as far as design improvements go, zinc-bromine
batteries are on fire. And considering Australia’s bushfires and overall hot climate,
the country’s relationship to zinc-bromine batteries makes perfect sense. In fact,
the blackouts that Australians experience as a consequence of bushfires are what prompted
Australian state and federal governments to invest in using rechargeable batteries for
residential battery energy storage systems and at remote telecommunications stations.
Redflow’s battery is especially poised for use at telecom stations because of its small size
relative to other flow batteries, according to the company’s Systems Integration Architect.
Once zinc-bromine batteries reach the end of their lives, they’re easier to recycle
than lithium-based batteries, as well. Because zinc-bromine electrolyte is dense,
it’s often recycled by the oil and gas industry. And because the Endure’s casing is the same as
a lead-acid battery’s casing, it can be recycled in the same way, but with the added advantage of
what the company calls more “benign” components − as in, not toxic lead or corrosive sulfuric acid.
Zinc-bromine batteries aren’t perfect. In general, zinc-bromine batteries face the risk
of zinc dendrite formation, which can threaten to poke through the battery’s separator. As a result,
zinc-bromine RFBs usually require maintenance in the form “strip cycles” to remove zinc
buildup. It’s worth mentioning, though, that Redflow claims that completely discharging
its batteries strips the zinc away. And Gelion’s answer to dendrites is a porous
membrane separating the zinc and bromide that evidently inhibits their growth.
But like any other technology, zinc-bromine batteries are not the end-all be-all. They’re
tailored to specific purposes: large-scale grids, long-term storage, rural areas, and extreme
temperatures. It isn’t sensical to compare them to solid-state batteries, for example,
because they’re meant to solve different problems. Solid-state batteries are thin and small;
zinc-bromine batteries are (relatively) big and heavy. Solid-states are generating buzz for their
potential use in EVs. Zinc-bromine batteries, on the other hand, are meant for providing
electricity to your home, solar or wind farms, or remote areas. Overall, zinc-bromine batteries may
work well for fixed locations, but will be far too bulky for mobile or portable uses.
Perhaps the most critical difference, though, is that the production of solid-state batteries
is currently too expensive to adapt to applications in EVs and consumer
electronics. zinc-bromine batteries are already here.
So are you still undecided? Do you think zinc-bromine batteries will gain ground
and become a big player in energy storage? Jump into the comments and let me know. And
be sure to check out my follow up podcast Still TBD where we'll be discussing some
of your feedback. If you liked this video, be sure to check out one of these videos
over here. And thanks to all of my patrons for your continued support and making these
videos possible. And thanks to all of you for watching. I'll see you in the next one.