the aftermath, and the setting up of the Committee of Inquiry to look into the causes of the
riot. A number of MPs have also raised questions about the overall management of foreign workers
in Singapore. Let me provide an overview of the foreign worker landscape here in Singapore.
Our foreign workforce has always been part of our economy and foreign workers have contributed
significantly to our progress and the well-being of Singaporeans. The growth of the workforce
accelerated towards the latter half of the 2000s. However, in line with the recommendations
made by the Economic Strategies Committee in 2010, we began to moderate the growth of
foreign workers to more sustainable levels, with a greater emphasis on productivity improvements.
We also took deliberate and progressive steps to raise the quality profile of our foreign
workforce and help businesses reduce their reliance on low-cost foreign labour. We will
continue to do so in a targeted and adaptive manner, taking into consideration three things.
Firstly, the growth rate of our foreign workforce; secondly, the productivity growth of our overall
economy; and lastly the real wage growth of Singaporeans at all levels. This is something
that we are already doing anyway, and to Mr Dhinakaran's question, the riot will not have
a material impact on these plans. Indeed, we have progressively reduced foreign
worker growth every year. At end of November 2013, we had about 1.1 million foreign workers,
excluding foreign domestic workers. Of this pool, about 700,000 were work permit holders.
Ms Irene Ng asked whether the rate of growth of foreign construction workers is "sustainable"
and whether there should be a "cap". Well, clearly there is a delicate balance that we do need
to strike. Many of us recognise and accept that foreign workers are needed to build infrastructure
like roads, MRT networks, hospitals, housing, and public facilities for Singaporeans.
But we also recognise that the growth also cannot be unabated. We will continue therefore
to moderate the growth of foreign workers. As part of our restructuring, we should learn
to do more with less. For example, construction is the biggest driver for foreign worker numbers.
Hence, in June 2010, the Building Construction Authority (BCA) launched the $250 million
Construction Productivity and Capability Fund to incentivise the construction industry to
improve productivity and strengthen its capabilities. To require the adoption of more productive
methods of construction, BCA has also raised the minimum "Buildable Design" and "Constructability"
requirements for all new projects from 1 September 2013. These are important initiatives, especially
for this sector. We will continue to monitor the situation closely and take further steps
as needed to dampen the demand for foreign workers.
Let me now talk about how our foreign workforce
is managed here in Singapore. Ms Janice Koh asked about a study on issues
facing foreign workers. Foreign workers in Singapore are, by and large, treated decently
by their employers. And I would say, treated decently by Singaporeans. A 2011 survey commissioned
by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and Migrant Workers' Centre, covered about 3,000 WPHs
and 500 S Pass holders. It showed that more than 90% of these foreign workers were satisfied
with their overall experience of working in Singapore, and more than 80% would wish to
continue working here. MOM conducted another survey in November 2013 with departing foreign
workers and the results were largely similar. Of the over 150 foreign construction workers
interviewed at the airport, more than 90% did not have any employment issues; and 80%
were happy working in Singapore. A few who worked in other countries said Singapore was
still the best as it provided a safe and good work environment for them. Ms Tin Pei Ling
asked how we compare with other countries. Well, let me put it this way: foreign workers
choose to come to Singapore, and these days, with information being freely available online
and elsewhere, they are not ignorant if the situation here is chronic. Bad news will spread.
What is the reality? Many consider Singapore to be an attractive destination country, and
many foreigners at all levels continue to want to come here for work if they have the
chance and opportunity to do so. Their rights and help available are clearly listed. For
example, before they arrive here, we make sure that workers know what their pay will
be via the In-Principal Approval Letter that is issued to all of them. During the Work Permit
card issuance process, workers are also informed of channels of assistance, provided by both
Government agencies and NGOs. And obviously, they always have recourse with their own embassies
or High Commissions as well. Does it therefore appear that all or most
foreign workers here are poorly treated? I believe that the situation is generally good,
but it is not perfect. There is always room for improvement.
From January to November 2013, MOM assisted approximately 7,000 foreign workers with
difficulties -- about half of these cases were employment-related, covering things like
salary and overtime claims. It ranges from minor issues to relatively major issues. This
represents less than 1% of foreign work permit holders.
When we come across cases of errant employers who flout our laws, and they do exist, my
Ministry takes a strong enforcement stance, and will continue to do so. To Mr Pritam Singh's
question, MOM also regularly reviews our legislation to ensure that the protection accorded to
workers remains adequate and appropriate. For example, under the recent changes to the
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, we doubled the maximum penalty for the contravention
of any condition of the work pass, including the condition for employers to ensure that
workers have acceptable accommodation. Other enhancements to the Employment Act which will
take effect this April will see a new 25% sub-cap against excessive deductions. The
penalties for employers who fail to pay workers' salaries will also increase.
To Ms Mary Liew's question, my Ministry works closely with NGO partners who refer cases
of mistreatment they come across to MOM officers, and they do so regularly. For example, last
year, there were about 640 of such NGO-referred cases.
640. Well, it covers about less than 0.1% of work permit
holders here in Singapore. I therefore find it puzzling as to how some
individuals can so quickly conclude or criticise that there is widespread and systemic abuse
of the foreign workforce; and that these were the reasons for the riot. In the same vein,
some foreign media just echo these points but offer only scant evidence for their assertions.
We do not think there is basis for these assertions, but we do look forward to the COI's perspective
on the matter. We also believe that it is wrong for these individuals to portray Singapore
and portray Singaporeans and our employers in this light because that is not how things are,
nor who we are as a people. During our visits to the dorms after the riot, many foreign
workers told us that they were ashamed by the conduct of those responsible. The Indian
High Commissioner to Singapore, Ms Vijay Thaur Singh, also shared that that there was no
discontent discerned among the Indian community of foreign workers in Singapore. Our various
sources in the industry also do not indicate any perceptible disquiet.
Managing our foreign workforce well is important. Ms Denise Phua would be glad to know that
actually since 2008, an inter-ministerial committee has been working towards better
management of foreign workers in Singapore, covering issues like housing, transport and security.
Now, let me talk about housing for our foreign
workforce. Foreign work permit holders are currently accommodated in a variety of premises,
including purpose built dormitories, workers' quarters on construction sites, converted
industrial properties, HDB flats and private residential premises. Assoc Prof Eugene Tan
may wish to note that a vast majority of these housing premises are well within existing
regulatory norms. Mr Alex Yam asked about the security requirements
at foreign worker dormitories. Dorm operators are required to comply with security requirements
imposed by the Police. For example, they have to install CCTVs around the dorms and draw
Emergency Response Plans to deal with public order incidents. Since the riot, the Police
has also advised dorm operators to step up security and will also provide them with training.
SPF reviews and calibrates these requirements regularly.
Ms Tan Su Shan and Associate Professor Fatimah Lateef asked how we can improve the living
conditions of foreign workers in Singapore. Mr Alex Yam also asked about measures to manage
areas where they congregate. Even before the riot, we had identified the need, and it is
an important need, over the next two to three years, to speed up the construction of more
dorms so that more foreign workers can move to purpose-built accommodation. These dormitories
must set aside adequate living space, and provide basic amenities and recreational facilities
such as gyms, canteens, television rooms and computer access. These help to ensure that
the daily basic living needs of foreign workers are taken care of.
To supplement the basic facilities in dorms and also to provide for those who are currently
not in purpose-built facilities, the government decided to establish dedicated recreation
centres for foreign workers some time ago. The one at Soon Lee Road was launched in 2009.
The others at Kaki Bukit, Woodlands and Penjuru were initiated thereafter and were fully operational
by 2011 and 2012. These centres provide a wider range of amenities that individual dormitories
may not be able to, such as remittance services, supermarkets, sports facilities, and AXS machines.
They are well-utilised by foreign workers, ranging in the thousands on weekends. The
number of visitors is especially high when these centres host events such as sports competitions,
cultural celebrations and movie screenings which are organised regularly. I have attended
some of these, and clearly, the response has been very positive amongst the foreign workers.
The government will launch more of such gathering spaces, to better cater to foreign workers'
needs. So we can better fill up the space in terms of foreign worker accommodation.
But while these recreation centres are important and they provide alternative options, the
reality is that they can never totally replace popular spots like Little India, which have
naturally evolved over time to cater to foreign workers' physical, and importantly, their
emotional needs. Foreign workers need a place to come together to catch up with old friends,
on news from the village, have a taste of food from home, and meet friends and relatives
from across the island for the few precious hours that they have. This is really not very
different from any Singaporean looking to relax and hang out with friends after a hard
week at work. Recreation centres can try, but I don't believe that they can always meet these
psychological and emotional needs. But I also believe that actually Singaporeans do understand
and appreciate the need for these shared spaces. Unlike the picture painted by the critics,
I do believe that Singaporeans are generally big-hearted and accommodating. And I think
that in a large part is why many foreign workers are also comfortable coming to Singapore to
work. On the part of the government, we will continue to try to manage these areas well,
so that we can coexist harmoniously. On that note, I would like to assure Associate
Professor Fatimah Lateef and Mr Alex Yam that active steps are being taken to address the
safety and security concerns in areas where foreign workers tend to congregate -- some
of which have already been listed by DPM Teo. I also agree with Ms Tin Pei Ling and Mr Teo
Siong Seng that the government should continue to encourage businesses that are able to roster
their off-days to do so. Another strategy obviously is education. MOM
works closely with NGO partners to educate foreign workers about Singapore's social norms
and laws. We do so through various avenues, such as during compulsory safety training
courses and guidebooks in their native languages, which are issued to them when they collect
their work passes. And we also conduct regular roadshows in the dormitories, reaching out
to many thousands of foreign workers as well.
Let me therefore end by reiterating that foreign
workers contribute positively to all our well being; and the vast majority of them are hardworking
and responsible. It would be wrong to make negative generalisations about the foreign
workforce from this incident. Neither should we generalise about the chronic and poor treatment
of these workers. The government will continue to monitor closely the overall number of foreign
workers and their impact on the communities they interact with. Importantly, we must also
continue to enhance the management of their well-being.