ITSELF AND BY ALLIES OF THE U.S. LIKE ISRAEL. SO
U.S. LIKE ISRAEL. SO WHEN WE ASKED WHAT SHOULD OR
SO WHEN WE ASKED WHAT SHOULD OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN TO PUTIN,
WHEN WE ASKED WHAT SHOULD OR WHAT COULD HAPPEN TO PUTIN, WE ALSO HAVE TO ASK. WHAT IS
WHAT COULD HAPPEN TO PUTIN, WE ALSO HAVE TO ASK. WHAT IS THE U.S. REALLY WILLING TO DO
WE ALSO HAVE TO ASK. WHAT IS THE U.S. REALLY WILLING TO DO ABOUT IT. ARE WE THE
THE U.S. REALLY WILLING TO DO ABOUT IT. ARE WE THE EXCEPTIONAL NATION THAT
ABOUT IT. ARE WE THE EXCEPTIONAL NATION THAT CONTINUES?
EXCEPTIONAL NATION THAT CONTINUES? CONTINUES TO
CONTINUES? CONTINUES TO EXCEPT OURSELVES FROM
CONTINUES TO EXCEPT OURSELVES FROM INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND THE
EXCEPT OURSELVES FROM INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND THE INSTITUTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE.
INSTITUTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE. WHAT DOES THE
JUSTICE. WHAT DOES THE WIDESPREAD OUTRAGE AT THE
WHAT DOES THE WIDESPREAD OUTRAGE AT THE CRIMES OF PUTIN AND HIS
WIDESPREAD OUTRAGE AT THE CRIMES OF PUTIN AND HIS MILITARY IN
CRIMES OF PUTIN AND HIS MILITARY IN UKRAINE? PROVE THAT AMERICA
MILITARY IN UKRAINE? PROVE THAT AMERICA CAN AND MUST LEAD BY A MUCH
UKRAINE? PROVE THAT AMERICA CAN AND MUST LEAD BY A MUCH BETTER EXAMPLE THAN IT HAS.
CAN AND MUST LEAD BY A MUCH BETTER EXAMPLE THAN IT HAS. FAR.
BETTER EXAMPLE THAN IT HAS. FAR. WHO BETTER TO DISCUSS THIS
FAR. WHO BETTER TO DISCUSS THIS WITH THE LUIS MORENO-OCAMPO
WHO BETTER TO DISCUSS THIS WITH THE LUIS MORENO-OCAMPO HE SERVED AS THE FIRST
WITH THE LUIS MORENO-OCAMPO HE SERVED AS THE FIRST PROSECUTOR OF THE
HE SERVED AS THE FIRST PROSECUTOR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
PROSECUTOR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FROM 2003 TO 2012.
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FROM 2003 TO 2012. AND IS PROSECUTED THREE HEADS
FROM 2003 TO 2012. AND IS PROSECUTED THREE HEADS OF STATE FOR CRIMES AGAINST
AND IS PROSECUTED THREE HEADS OF STATE FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
OF STATE FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING
HUMANITY. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING ON THE SHOW THIS EVENING,
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING ON THE SHOW THIS EVENING, FIRST OFF IN AN IDEAL WORLD.
ON THE SHOW THIS EVENING, FIRST OFF IN AN IDEAL WORLD. HOW IS VLADIMIR PUTIN MADE
FIRST OFF IN AN IDEAL WORLD. HOW IS VLADIMIR PUTIN MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS WAR CRIMES
HOW IS VLADIMIR PUTIN MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS WAR CRIMES IN UKRAINE AND HASN‘T HE
ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS WAR CRIMES IN UKRAINE AND HASN‘T HE ALREADY GOTTEN AWAY WITH DOING
IN UKRAINE AND HASN‘T HE ALREADY GOTTEN AWAY WITH DOING WAR CRIMES IN CHECHNYA IN
ALREADY GOTTEN AWAY WITH DOING WAR CRIMES IN CHECHNYA IN SYRIA IN THE DONBAS OVER
WAR CRIMES IN CHECHNYA IN SYRIA IN THE DONBAS OVER THE PAST, TWO DECADES.
SYRIA IN THE DONBAS OVER THE PAST, TWO DECADES. WELL,
THE PAST, TWO DECADES. WELL, NEITHER IS
WELL, NEITHER IS SYRIA
NEITHER IS SYRIA OR TO JIGNA
SYRIA OR TO JIGNA OUR MEMBER ARE BUGS SEC. SO I
OR TO JIGNA OUR MEMBER ARE BUGS SEC. SO I SEE CONTRADICTION. IT‘S LIKE A
OUR MEMBER ARE BUGS SEC. SO I SEE CONTRADICTION. IT‘S LIKE A REQUESTING, A GERMAN
SEE CONTRADICTION. IT‘S LIKE A REQUESTING, A GERMAN PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE
REQUESTING, A GERMAN PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE PUTTING IN RUSSIA, OR OF
PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE PUTTING IN RUSSIA, OR OF BUSH IN THE US. THE PROSECUTOR
PUTTING IN RUSSIA, OR OF BUSH IN THE US. THE PROSECUTOR IS NOT THE WORLD
BUSH IN THE US. THE PROSECUTOR IS NOT THE WORLD PARTICULAR TO THE PROSECUTOR.
IS NOT THE WORLD PARTICULAR TO THE PROSECUTOR. I SEE ICC PROSECUTOR
PARTICULAR TO THE PROSECUTOR. I SEE ICC PROSECUTOR OEDIPUS, YOU DO. THEY CAN BE
I SEE ICC PROSECUTOR OEDIPUS, YOU DO. THEY CAN BE QUANTIFIED IT BRIEFLY IN THIS
OEDIPUS, YOU DO. THEY CAN BE QUANTIFIED IT BRIEFLY IN THIS CASE, UKRAINE.
QUANTIFIED IT BRIEFLY IN THIS CASE, UKRAINE. UKRAINE.
CASE, UKRAINE. UKRAINE. EXCEPTIONAL TEACHER - THAT IS
UKRAINE. EXCEPTIONAL TEACHER - THAT IS WHY
EXCEPTIONAL TEACHER - THAT IS WHY THEY WERE CRIMES
WHY THEY WERE CRIMES EVENTUALLY COMMITTED IN.
THEY WERE CRIMES EVENTUALLY COMMITTED IN. UKRAINE. COULD BE MITIGATED.
EVENTUALLY COMMITTED IN. UKRAINE. COULD BE MITIGATED. GOOD PUTTING THE PERSONAL
UKRAINE. COULD BE MITIGATED. GOOD PUTTING THE PERSONAL INDICTED,
GOOD PUTTING THE PERSONAL INDICTED, DEPEND DEPEND ON THE EVIDENCE.
INDICTED, DEPEND DEPEND ON THE EVIDENCE. IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT
DEPEND DEPEND ON THE EVIDENCE. IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT PUT IN ORDER TO COMMUNAL
IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT PUT IN ORDER TO COMMUNAL IT NOT BE SOMETHING THAT
PUT IN ORDER TO COMMUNAL IT NOT BE SOMETHING THAT SOMEONE
IT NOT BE SOMETHING THAT SOMEONE SOMEONE DIFFERENT?
SOMEONE SOMEONE DIFFERENT? THE ISSUE FOR ME.
SOMEONE DIFFERENT? THE ISSUE FOR ME. YEAH.
THE ISSUE FOR ME. YEAH. YES. LITTLE PLEASE FINISH YOUR
YEAH. YES. LITTLE PLEASE FINISH YOUR ANSWER.
YES. LITTLE PLEASE FINISH YOUR ANSWER. NO, NO, GO AHEAD.
ANSWER. NO, NO, GO AHEAD. I WAS GONNA ASK YOU, MENTIONED
NO, NO, GO AHEAD. I WAS GONNA ASK YOU, MENTIONED IN DATING PUTIN.
I WAS GONNA ASK YOU, MENTIONED IN DATING PUTIN. LET‘S SAY HE IS INDICTED.
IN DATING PUTIN. LET‘S SAY HE IS INDICTED. THAT‘S ONLY STEP ONE. YOU
LET‘S SAY HE IS INDICTED. THAT‘S ONLY STEP ONE. YOU STILL HAVE TO GET HIM TO THE
THAT‘S ONLY STEP ONE. YOU STILL HAVE TO GET HIM TO THE COURT. THE ICC
STILL HAVE TO GET HIM TO THE COURT. THE ICC DOESN‘T HAVE
COURT. THE ICC DOESN‘T HAVE ENFORCEMENT POWERS
DOESN‘T HAVE ENFORCEMENT POWERS TO QUOTE STALIN ON THE POPE.
ENFORCEMENT POWERS TO QUOTE STALIN ON THE POPE. HOW MANY DIVISIONS DOES THE
TO QUOTE STALIN ON THE POPE. HOW MANY DIVISIONS DOES THE ICC HAVE? AND WHEN YOU LOOK
HOW MANY DIVISIONS DOES THE ICC HAVE? AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT, FOR EXAMPLE,
ICC HAVE? AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT, FOR EXAMPLE, OMAR AL-BASHIR,
AT, FOR EXAMPLE, OMAR AL-BASHIR, THIS THE FORMER SUDANESE,
OMAR AL-BASHIR, THIS THE FORMER SUDANESE, DICTATOR YOUR TEAM, GOT
THIS THE FORMER SUDANESE, DICTATOR YOUR TEAM, GOT AN
DICTATOR YOUR TEAM, GOT AN INDICTMENT FOR
AN INDICTMENT FOR WHEN YOU WERE AT THE ICC, THE
INDICTMENT FOR WHEN YOU WERE AT THE ICC, THE FIRST SITTING
WHEN YOU WERE AT THE ICC, THE FIRST SITTING NATIONAL LEADER TO FACE A WAR
FIRST SITTING NATIONAL LEADER TO FACE A WAR CRIMES. PROSECUTION
NATIONAL LEADER TO FACE A WAR CRIMES. PROSECUTION LAST SUMMER, SUDAN ANNOUNCED
CRIMES. PROSECUTION LAST SUMMER, SUDAN ANNOUNCED IT WOULD HAND BESHEAR OVER TO
LAST SUMMER, SUDAN ANNOUNCED IT WOULD HAND BESHEAR OVER TO THE ICC,
IT WOULD HAND BESHEAR OVER TO THE ICC, BUT IT STILL HASN‘T THE
THE ICC, BUT IT STILL HASN‘T THE ORIGINAL INDICTMENT. I THINK
BUT IT STILL HASN‘T THE ORIGINAL INDICTMENT. I THINK WAS 2008, THAT‘S
ORIGINAL INDICTMENT. I THINK WAS 2008, THAT‘S 14 YEARS
WAS 2008, THAT‘S 14 YEARS AND COUNTING SINCE YOU FIRST
14 YEARS AND COUNTING SINCE YOU FIRST INDICTED HIM. NOW, UNDER PUTIN
AND COUNTING SINCE YOU FIRST INDICTED HIM. NOW, UNDER PUTIN ISN‘T WORRIED ABOUT EVER BEING
INDICTED HIM. NOW, UNDER PUTIN ISN‘T WORRIED ABOUT EVER BEING DRAGGED IN FRONT OF A WAR
ISN‘T WORRIED ABOUT EVER BEING DRAGGED IN FRONT OF A WAR CRIMES COURT.
DRAGGED IN FRONT OF A WAR CRIMES COURT. WELL, LET‘S SHOW
CRIMES COURT. WELL, LET‘S SHOW NOT JUDGE
WELL, LET‘S SHOW NOT JUDGE NUMBER OF THE USER HAS ITS OWN
NOT JUDGE NUMBER OF THE USER HAS ITS OWN POLICE. HIS OWN BODIES
NUMBER OF THE USER HAS ITS OWN POLICE. HIS OWN BODIES WHEN
POLICE. HIS OWN BODIES WHEN THE JUDGE IN THE U.S. ISSUE IS
WHEN THE JUDGE IN THE U.S. ISSUE IS TRACTION OR THE PROSECUTOR
THE JUDGE IN THE U.S. ISSUE IS TRACTION OR THE PROSECUTOR INDICT. SOMEONE A GRAND JURY,
TRACTION OR THE PROSECUTOR INDICT. SOMEONE A GRAND JURY, THE FBI, THE POLICE FOLLOW
INDICT. SOMEONE A GRAND JURY, THE FBI, THE POLICE FOLLOW THE JUDGES HERE, THE SAME
THE FBI, THE POLICE FOLLOW THE JUDGES HERE, THE SAME THE POLICE, THE
THE JUDGES HERE, THE SAME THE POLICE, THE ARMIES UNDER STATES. SO THE
THE POLICE, THE ARMIES UNDER STATES. SO THE RESPONSIBILITY TO IMPLEMENT
ARMIES UNDER STATES. SO THE RESPONSIBILITY TO IMPLEMENT OUT OF WARREN OTHER STATE
RESPONSIBILITY TO IMPLEMENT OUT OF WARREN OTHER STATE EXAMPLE,
OUT OF WARREN OTHER STATE EXAMPLE, BESHEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA.
EXAMPLE, BESHEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA. HE DID TO TRY TO ARRANGE.
BESHEAR PRESIDENT OBAMA. HE DID TO TRY TO ARRANGE. BESHEAR HAS DECIDED TO USE
HE DID TO TRY TO ARRANGE. BESHEAR HAS DECIDED TO USE THE ICE.
BESHEAR HAS DECIDED TO USE THE ICE. HE HAD A WARRANT TO LEVERAGE
THE ICE. HE HAD A WARRANT TO LEVERAGE NEGOTIATIONS WITH BASHIR TO
HE HAD A WARRANT TO LEVERAGE NEGOTIATIONS WITH BASHIR TO FREE THE THOUSANDS.
NEGOTIATIONS WITH BASHIR TO FREE THE THOUSANDS. THAT HE OBTAINED IT OUT SO
FREE THE THOUSANDS. THAT HE OBTAINED IT OUT SO GENOCIDE IN DARFUR CONTINUE
THAT HE OBTAINED IT OUT SO GENOCIDE IN DARFUR CONTINUE UNTIL WAS REMOVED BY GOOD DATA
GENOCIDE IN DARFUR CONTINUE UNTIL WAS REMOVED BY GOOD DATA AND NOW BUT SHE IS IN JAIL.
UNTIL WAS REMOVED BY GOOD DATA AND NOW BUT SHE IS IN JAIL. WE‘LL SEE WHEN AN IF
AND NOW BUT SHE IS IN JAIL. WE‘LL SEE WHEN AN IF IT GOES OR NOT TO
WE‘LL SEE WHEN AN IF IT GOES OR NOT TO TO THE SEC BUT IS ONE OF HIS
IT GOES OR NOT TO TO THE SEC BUT IS ONE OF HIS CORNERS AND MILITIA LEADER
TO THE SEC BUT IS ONE OF HIS CORNERS AND MILITIA LEADER TODAY
CORNERS AND MILITIA LEADER TODAY IN THE SEC UNDER UNDER
TODAY IN THE SEC UNDER UNDER TRIAL. SO
IN THE SEC UNDER UNDER TRIAL. SO IT TAKES TIME, BUT IT‘S
TRIAL. SO IT TAKES TIME, BUT IT‘S HAPPENING THAT. WHY? YES,
IT TAKES TIME, BUT IT‘S HAPPENING THAT. WHY? YES, Y-YES DIFFERENT THAN THE IN
HAPPENING THAT. WHY? YES, Y-YES DIFFERENT THAN THE IN THE
Y-YES DIFFERENT THAN THE IN THE NASTY TIME WE HAVE?
THE NASTY TIME WE HAVE? I‘M NOT VERY CLEARLY
NASTY TIME WE HAVE? I‘M NOT VERY CLEARLY BUT
I‘M NOT VERY CLEARLY BUT STOPPING THE RUN.
BUT STOPPING THE RUN. IT‘S NOT ENOUGH OF THE COURT.
STOPPING THE RUN. IT‘S NOT ENOUGH OF THE COURT. YOU NEED
IT‘S NOT ENOUGH OF THE COURT. YOU NEED AND IT‘S SO YOU JUST STOPPED.
YOU NEED AND IT‘S SO YOU JUST STOPPED. STOP CRYING. STOP CRYING. SO
AND IT‘S SO YOU JUST STOPPED. STOP CRYING. STOP CRYING. SO IN ORDER TO STOP CRIME, WE GOT
STOP CRYING. STOP CRYING. SO IN ORDER TO STOP CRIME, WE GOT TO STOP WORDS.
IN ORDER TO STOP CRIME, WE GOT TO STOP WORDS. YOU LIKE TO STOP
TO STOP WORDS. YOU LIKE TO STOP WAR CRIMES. STOP
YOU LIKE TO STOP WAR CRIMES. STOP WORDS. NOT JUST
WAR CRIMES. STOP WORDS. NOT JUST UKRAINIAN WAR. LET‘S SELL IT.
WORDS. NOT JUST UKRAINIAN WAR. LET‘S SELL IT. YEAH, LET‘S SAY PUTIN
UKRAINIAN WAR. LET‘S SELL IT. YEAH, LET‘S SAY PUTIN IS INDICTED,
YEAH, LET‘S SAY PUTIN IS INDICTED, BUT HE NEVER GETS TO A TRIAL.
IS INDICTED, BUT HE NEVER GETS TO A TRIAL. WHAT HAPPENS? NEXT? IS THERE A
BUT HE NEVER GETS TO A TRIAL. WHAT HAPPENS? NEXT? IS THERE A CASE? COULD
WHAT HAPPENS? NEXT? IS THERE A CASE? COULD THIS BE A CASE?
CASE? COULD THIS BE A CASE? CASE WHERE HE‘S, THEN VERY
THIS BE A CASE? CASE WHERE HE‘S, THEN VERY LIMITED ON WHERE HE CAN TRAVEL
CASE WHERE HE‘S, THEN VERY LIMITED ON WHERE HE CAN TRAVEL IN RETIREMENT. SHOULD YOU EVER
LIMITED ON WHERE HE CAN TRAVEL IN RETIREMENT. SHOULD YOU EVER DECIDE TO RETIRE?
IN RETIREMENT. SHOULD YOU EVER DECIDE TO RETIRE? COULD HE
DECIDE TO RETIRE? COULD HE FACED EXTRADITION ONCE HE‘S A
COULD HE FACED EXTRADITION ONCE HE‘S A PRIVATE CITIZEN, SHOULD HE
FACED EXTRADITION ONCE HE‘S A PRIVATE CITIZEN, SHOULD HE EVER BECOME A PRIVATE CITIZEN
PRIVATE CITIZEN, SHOULD HE EVER BECOME A PRIVATE CITIZEN AGAIN?
EVER BECOME A PRIVATE CITIZEN AGAIN? YES, OF COURSE. LOOK,
AGAIN? YES, OF COURSE. LOOK, THE
YES, OF COURSE. LOOK, THE THAT IS INDICTED.
THE THAT IS INDICTED. IN BESHEAR. AND THEN AFTER
THAT IS INDICTED. IN BESHEAR. AND THEN AFTER THREE YEARS, HE WAS DEMOTED
IN BESHEAR. AND THEN AFTER THREE YEARS, HE WAS DEMOTED GADDAFI WAS KILLED
THREE YEARS, HE WAS DEMOTED GADDAFI WAS KILLED THE ONLY PERSON ARRESTED. IN
GADDAFI WAS KILLED THE ONLY PERSON ARRESTED. IN FACT, WAS PRESSING
THE ONLY PERSON ARRESTED. IN FACT, WAS PRESSING GAG BALL FROM
FACT, WAS PRESSING GAG BALL FROM IVORY COAST AND THEN
GAG BALL FROM IVORY COAST AND THEN THEY GOT ACQUITTED HIM.
IVORY COAST AND THEN THEY GOT ACQUITTED HIM. IT‘S SO MAYBE AT THE END OF
THEY GOT ACQUITTED HIM. IT‘S SO MAYBE AT THE END OF THE,
IT‘S SO MAYBE AT THE END OF THE, AT THE END,
THE, AT THE END, THE
AT THE END, THE BEST DESTINY FOR THE THREE
THE BEST DESTINY FOR THE THREE PRESSING
BEST DESTINY FOR THE THREE PRESSING WIND EITHER IN MY TIME. WAS
PRESSING WIND EITHER IN MY TIME. WAS GOD, WHO WAS
WIND EITHER IN MY TIME. WAS GOD, WHO WAS ACQUITTED. SO BUT THE PROBLEM
GOD, WHO WAS ACQUITTED. SO BUT THE PROBLEM IS,
ACQUITTED. SO BUT THE PROBLEM IS, BUT EVEN A QUITTER OF
IS, BUT EVEN A QUITTER OF GAG
BUT EVEN A QUITTER OF GAG BO DID NOT CHANGE THAT TODAY.
GAG BO DID NOT CHANGE THAT TODAY. I BRING CODES
BO DID NOT CHANGE THAT TODAY. I BRING CODES IS
I BRING CODES IS STABLE
IS STABLE IS IN PEACE. MOSTLY. SO
STABLE IS IN PEACE. MOSTLY. SO THE ISSUE NOT JUST ABOUT
IS IN PEACE. MOSTLY. SO THE ISSUE NOT JUST ABOUT CONVICTING THE
THE ISSUE NOT JUST ABOUT CONVICTING THE RESPONSIBLE, WE TAKE TIME TIME
CONVICTING THE RESPONSIBLE, WE TAKE TIME TIME TIME BECAUSE
RESPONSIBLE, WE TAKE TIME TIME TIME BECAUSE THERE ARE PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF
TIME BECAUSE THERE ARE PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF POWER.
THERE ARE PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF POWER. THEY SHOULD HAVE TO STOP WARS
POWER. THEY SHOULD HAVE TO STOP WARS BECAUSE THAT IS FOR ME THE THE
THEY SHOULD HAVE TO STOP WARS BECAUSE THAT IS FOR ME THE THE WAY TO STOP WAR CRIMES
BECAUSE THAT IS FOR ME THE THE WAY TO STOP WAR CRIMES IS TO STOP WARS
WAY TO STOP WAR CRIMES IS TO STOP WARS AND NOT JUST
IS TO STOP WARS AND NOT JUST WORRYING. GREAT,
AND NOT JUST WORRYING. GREAT, NOT JUST WORRIED IN UKRAINE
WORRYING. GREAT, NOT JUST WORRIED IN UKRAINE FOR ME.
NOT JUST WORRIED IN UKRAINE FOR ME. I‘M
FOR ME. I‘M I‘M SHOCKED.
I‘M I‘M SHOCKED. IT‘S A NEW WORLD
I‘M SHOCKED. IT‘S A NEW WORLD AFTER UKRAINE,
IT‘S A NEW WORLD AFTER UKRAINE, IN IN ARMENIA
AFTER UKRAINE, IN IN ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN
IN IN ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN IN THE
AZERBAIJAN IN THE I MEAN YOU AND YOU KNOW WHY
IN THE I MEAN YOU AND YOU KNOW WHY THEY
I MEAN YOU AND YOU KNOW WHY THEY DIDN‘T BECAUSE THE THE
THEY DIDN‘T BECAUSE THE THE PEACEKEEPER
DIDN‘T BECAUSE THE THE PEACEKEEPER ROLE IN ARMENIA WITH RUSSIA,
SO
SO AZERBAIJAN TOOK ADVANTAGE THE
SO AZERBAIJAN TOOK ADVANTAGE THE RUSSIAN
AZERBAIJAN TOOK ADVANTAGE THE RUSSIAN BC IN UKRAINE,
RUSSIAN BC IN UKRAINE, AN INVALID ARMENIA,
BC IN UKRAINE, AN INVALID ARMENIA, AND I WILL TALK ABOUT OUR
AN INVALID ARMENIA, AND I WILL TALK ABOUT OUR MEDIA. COME ON
AND I WILL TALK ABOUT OUR MEDIA. COME ON HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
MEDIA. COME ON HUNDRED YEARS AGO. WE
HUNDRED YEARS AGO. WE ARE MANY ASK YOU THIS. LET ME
WE ARE MANY ASK YOU THIS. LET ME ASK YOU THIS BEFORE, BECAUSE
ARE MANY ASK YOU THIS. LET ME ASK YOU THIS BEFORE, BECAUSE WE‘RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF
ASK YOU THIS BEFORE, BECAUSE WE‘RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF TIME, BUT I HAVE TO ASK YOU
WE‘RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF TIME, BUT I HAVE TO ASK YOU SOMETHING ABOUT
TIME, BUT I HAVE TO ASK YOU SOMETHING ABOUT THAT. WHAT YOU DID WHEN YOU
SOMETHING ABOUT THAT. WHAT YOU DID WHEN YOU WERE
THAT. WHAT YOU DID WHEN YOU WERE ICC PROSECUTOR IN
WERE ICC PROSECUTOR IN 2006, I BELIEVE YOU LOOKED
ICC PROSECUTOR IN 2006, I BELIEVE YOU LOOKED INTO ALLEGATIONS.
2006, I BELIEVE YOU LOOKED INTO ALLEGATIONS. OF WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE BUSH
INTO ALLEGATIONS. OF WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, AND THE BLAIR
OF WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, AND THE BLAIR GOVERNMENT IN THE UK,
ADMINISTRATION, AND THE BLAIR GOVERNMENT IN THE UK, IN RELATION TO THEIR INVASION
GOVERNMENT IN THE UK, IN RELATION TO THEIR INVASION OF IRAQ, ILLEGAL, INVASION OF
IN RELATION TO THEIR INVASION OF IRAQ, ILLEGAL, INVASION OF IRAQ. YOU ULTIMATELY DECLINED
OF IRAQ, ILLEGAL, INVASION OF IRAQ. YOU ULTIMATELY DECLINED TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE THE
IRAQ. YOU ULTIMATELY DECLINED TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE THE ALLEGED CRIMES WEREN‘T
TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE THE ALLEGED CRIMES WEREN‘T GRAVE ENOUGH.
ALLEGED CRIMES WEREN‘T GRAVE ENOUGH. DO YOU REGRET THAT DECISION AT
GRAVE ENOUGH. DO YOU REGRET THAT DECISION AT ALL? DO YOU THINK THAT SET A
DO YOU REGRET THAT DECISION AT ALL? DO YOU THINK THAT SET A PRECEDENT FOR SUPERPOWERS
ALL? DO YOU THINK THAT SET A PRECEDENT FOR SUPERPOWERS WHO AREN‘T PARTY TO THE COURT
PRECEDENT FOR SUPERPOWERS WHO AREN‘T PARTY TO THE COURT LIKE THE US AND RUSSIA?
WHO AREN‘T PARTY TO THE COURT LIKE THE US AND RUSSIA? THANK YOU FOR AGGRESSIVELY. I
LIKE THE US AND RUSSIA? THANK YOU FOR AGGRESSIVELY. I DO ME TO CLARIFY
THANK YOU FOR AGGRESSIVELY. I DO ME TO CLARIFY A GRUESOME CRIME IN MY TIME
DO ME TO CLARIFY A GRUESOME CRIME IN MY TIME WOULD NOT POSSIBLE TO MITIGATE
A GRUESOME CRIME IN MY TIME WOULD NOT POSSIBLE TO MITIGATE BECAUSE THE DECISION TO
WOULD NOT POSSIBLE TO MITIGATE BECAUSE THE DECISION TO PROSECUTE THAT WE CAN
BECAUSE THE DECISION TO PROSECUTE THAT WE CAN PROSECUTE
PROSECUTE THAT WE CAN PROSECUTE A GRUESOME CRIME SCENE.
PROSECUTE A GRUESOME CRIME SCENE. BEN 2017. NOT
A GRUESOME CRIME SCENE. BEN 2017. NOT IN MY TIME. I LEFT IN 2012,
BEN 2017. NOT IN MY TIME. I LEFT IN 2012, SO I HAD NO JURISDICTION
IN MY TIME. I LEFT IN 2012, SO I HAD NO JURISDICTION AGAINST US TROOPS.
SO I HAD NO JURISDICTION AGAINST US TROOPS. I WAS MONITORING
AGAINST US TROOPS. I WAS MONITORING GRAND COMMITTED BY UK IN THOSE
I WAS MONITORING GRAND COMMITTED BY UK IN THOSE DAYS
GRAND COMMITTED BY UK IN THOSE DAYS THAT HE HAD NOT ENOUGH
DAYS THAT HE HAD NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONSIDER
THAT HE HAD NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONSIDER CRIMES, WERE COMMITTED TO USE
EVIDENCE TO CONSIDER CRIMES, WERE COMMITTED TO USE ENOUGH TO PROSECUTE, YOU
CRIMES, WERE COMMITTED TO USE ENOUGH TO PROSECUTE, YOU GET TROOPS
ENOUGH TO PROSECUTE, YOU GET TROOPS LATER,
GET TROOPS LATER, PART OF AND THROUGH THAT
LATER, PART OF AND THROUGH THAT PERSON, YOU THE PICTURE YOU
PART OF AND THROUGH THAT PERSON, YOU THE PICTURE YOU SHOWED
PERSON, YOU THE PICTURE YOU SHOWED BY SUCCESSOR, REOPEN THE
SHOWED BY SUCCESSOR, REOPEN THE PROCESS. AND AGAIN
BY SUCCESSOR, REOPEN THE PROCESS. AND AGAIN EXAMINE
PROCESS. AND AGAIN EXAMINE EXAMINE WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE
EXAMINE EXAMINE WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE GRANT COMMITTEE IN IRAQ, SO
EXAMINE WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE GRANT COMMITTEE IN IRAQ, SO THAT‘S WHAT COULD HAPPEN.
GRANT COMMITTEE IN IRAQ, SO THAT‘S WHAT COULD HAPPEN. LOOK,
THAT‘S WHAT COULD HAPPEN. LOOK, I
LOOK, I AS A PROSECUTOR, YOU FOLLOW
I AS A PROSECUTOR, YOU FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. THAT‘S WHY IN
AS A PROSECUTOR, YOU FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. THAT‘S WHY IN THE PUTTING CASE, ONE
THE EVIDENCE. THAT‘S WHY IN THE PUTTING CASE, ONE PROBLEM IS THE FIRST ONE WE
THE PUTTING CASE, ONE PROBLEM IS THE FIRST ONE WE HAVE IS TO COLLECT THE
PROBLEM IS THE FIRST ONE WE HAVE IS TO COLLECT THE EVIDENCE
HAVE IS TO COLLECT THE EVIDENCE BUT TO PROTECT UKRAINIANS
EVIDENCE BUT TO PROTECT UKRAINIANS IS NOT ENOUGH TO STOP
BUT TO PROTECT UKRAINIANS IS NOT ENOUGH TO STOP WAR CRIMES. WE SHOULD STOP THE
IS NOT ENOUGH TO STOP WAR CRIMES. WE SHOULD STOP THE WAR
WAR CRIMES. WE SHOULD STOP THE WAR AND TO PROTECT THE
WAR AND TO PROTECT THE CUOLD TO LEARN ABOUT
AND TO PROTECT THE CUOLD TO LEARN ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED. WE NEED TO STOP
CUOLD TO LEARN ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED. WE NEED TO STOP ALL THE WORK AND DATA
WHAT HAPPENED. WE NEED TO STOP ALL THE WORK AND DATA NELSON MANDELA SAY.
ALL THE WORK AND DATA NELSON MANDELA SAY. I NEVER
NELSON MANDELA SAY. I NEVER LOSE
I NEVER LOSE I WIN OR I LEARN.
LOSE I WIN OR I LEARN. WE NEED TO LEARN ABOUT
I WIN OR I LEARN. WE NEED TO LEARN ABOUT WORSE IN. UKRAINE IN ARMENIA
WE NEED TO LEARN ABOUT WORSE IN. UKRAINE IN ARMENIA AND STOP
WORSE IN. UKRAINE IN ARMENIA AND STOP WORDS.
AND STOP WORDS. WE‘LL HAVE TO LEAVE IT THERE.
WORDS. WE‘LL HAVE TO LEAVE IT THERE. LUIS MORENO-OCAMPO. THANK YOU
WE‘LL HAVE TO LEAVE IT THERE. LUIS MORENO-OCAMPO. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT. I