WILL BE AN ISSUE, AFTER THE
ELECTION.
>> TALK ABOUT ABOUT OTHER
IMPORTANT STORY THIS MORNING
THAT IS FACEBOOK BEING FIND,
THE FTC SAID MASSIVE
APPROXIMATE ON FACEBOOK OF A
PRIVACY ISSUES AS WELL AS
SHARING DATA, JACKIE
DeANGELIS.
>> GOOD MORNING TO YOU THAT IS
RIGHT A 5-BILLION-DOLLAR
SETTLEMENT WITH FTC FACEBOOK
LARGEST CIVIL PENT EVER PAID
TO THE FTC WHAT THE FTC IS
SIGHING HERE IS THAT FACEBOOK
VIOLATED A PRIOR ORDER FROM
2012 CONCERNING PRIVACY ISSUES
AND THAT IS WHAT THIS FINE
RELATES BACK TO WHAT IS REALLY
INTERESTING HERE A
PRIVATIZATION COMMITTEE HAS TO
BE SET UP, THAT COMMITTEE HAS
TO BE INDEPENDENT CEO
ZUCKERBERG HAS TO CERTIFICATE
THAT THE COMPANY IS COMPLYING
WITH RULES THAT IS ON A
QUARTERLIED AND ANNUAL BASIS,
IF HE MAKES FALSE STATEMENTS
HE WOULD BE SUBJECT TO
CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTY
HIMSELF SO ZUCKERBERG TAKING
ON A LOT OF RESPONSIBILITY
HERE, AND DOESN'T JUST DEAL
WITH FACEBOOK BUT ALSO DEALS
WITH WHAT IT SAYS APP
INSTAGRAM ANY PRODUCTS THAT
FACEBOOK MY OFFER A COUPLE
OTHER PRIVACY RESTRICTIONS
INCLUDED IN THIS FACEBOOK IS
BANNED FROM USING PHONE
NUMBERS TO ENABLE SECURITY
FEATURES FACEBOOK MUST
EXERCISE GREATER OVERSIGHT ON
THIRD PARTY APPS THAT IT
WORKED WITH IT MUST PROVIDE
CLEAR CONSPICUOUS NOTICE OF
FACIAL RECOGNITION IF GOING TO
US YOO IT PROHIBITED FROM
ASKING FOR E-MAIL PASSWORDS
FOR OTHER SERVICES CONNECTED
TO IN INTERVIEW FTC
COMMISSIONER SAID THE ORDER
CREATES A ROBUST OF CHECKS AND
BALANCES SPREADS
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTABILITY
FOR CONSUMER PRIVACY MARIA
LARGEST CIVIL PENALTY EVER
TODAY POT FTC 5 BILLION
DOLLARS, THIS IS A HUGE AMOUNT
OF MONEY TALKING ABOUT, AND
HUGE IN TERMS OF SETTING THE
STAGE ON THE SCOPE OF WHAT IS
TO COME IN TERMS OF SOCIAL
MEDIA COMPANIES AND PRIVACY
ISSUES.
>> THANK YOU HUGE FINE THAT
FACEBOOK IS FACING JUDGE, ALSO
PART OF THIS OTHER BIGGER
STORY WHERE AT THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL, HAS STARTED A NEW
ANTITRUST INQUIRY INTO BIG
TECH.
>> THIS IS AN INACQUIRE BY
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY EVEN
THOUGH AN ADMINISTRATIVE
AGENCY STILL FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT, IT IS HARD FOR ME
TO TAKE SERIOUSLY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT FINING AN INTENT
TOR VIOLATING PRIVACY THE
FEDERALING IS BIGGEST VIOLATOR
OF PRIVACY ON PLANET NFRLS
THIS IS WHAT THEY DO FIVE
BILLION A LOT OF MONEY A DROP
IN THE BUCKET FOR FACEBOOK THE
REASON SO HIGH IS THIS IS AN
EXPRESS VIOLATIONS OF
AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED
INTO YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH ONE
BUT VIOLATE AN AGREEMENT THAT
THAT ALREADY RESTRAINS YOU HE
THAT IS ALREADY IN PLACE, THEY
ARE GOING TO COME DOWN ON YOU
VERY HOARD.
AS FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
INVESTIGATION, ANNOUNCED
YESTERDAY, SOME SORT OF --
ANTICOMPETITIVE INVESTIGATION,
ON IN HOW I SHOWS HARMLESS TO
QUERIES FACEBOOK FREE GOOGLE
FREE NO HARP TO THE CONSUMER.
>> THE CONVERSATION, JUDGE.
>> THEY CAN DO THAT NOT THE
GOVERNMENT SO THEY CAN SENSOR
ANYBODY THEY WANT -- THEY CAN
DO IT.
>> GOOGLE HAS 90% MARKET SHARE
SO IF GOOGLE HAS 90% MARKET
SHARPER IN SEARCH THEY ARE THE
BIG KAHIGH ONA ON SEARCH IF
THEY ARE PUTTING, CERTAIN
HEADLINES IN SEARCH IF I
SEARCH DONALD TRUMP GETTING
ALL UGLY HEADLINES I SEARCH
HILLARY CLINTON GETTING HILL
HI HILL SUPER STAR BEST THING
SINCE SLIDE OF BREAD THAT IS
CENSORING INFORMATION?
>>S IT IS.
>> ANDING USING 90% MARKET
SHARE IT IS -- IT IS LAWFUL IF
YOU DON'T LIKE THAT USE
ANOTHER ONE FIRST AMENDMENT --
>> I HAVE A QUESTION NOT
ANSWER ABOUT YOU KNOW,
SLANDEROUS MATERIAL IF
SOMEBODY GETS ON ONE PLATFORM
AND COMMITS SLANDER PER SE, I
COMPLAIN AGAINST YOU YOU
COMPLAIN ABOUT ME I TAKE IT
DOWN WHAT IS LIABILITY.
>> VERY GOOD QUESTION, I WILL
TELL YOU --
>> SUING TWITTER.
>> I TELL WHERE YOU THAT DOOR
IS OPENED IF AMAZON SALES
PRODUCT FROM A THIRD-PARTY
VENDOR, HARMLESS SOMEBODY
THIRD BATTER VRPD DOESN'T HAVE
INSURANCE GOES OUT OF BUSINESS
AMAZON CAN BE SUED FOR THE
FIRST TIME SUPREME COURT RULED
ON THAT ABOUT A MONTH OR SO
AGO, THAT IS OPENING THE DOOR
TO LITIGATION OVER THIS.
BUT -- BUT -- DOING SOMETHING
TO GOOGLE YOU DON'T LIKE THEIR
POLITICS THE ANSWER IS, FIND
SOMETHING ELSE --
>> THAT IS DOESN'T FLY IF
MEDIA COMPANY.
>> WHY?
>> PROTECTED BY FIRST
AMENDMENT.
>> BUT THEY ARE SAYING.
>> COME AFTER FOX BECAUSE IT
DOMINATED CERTAIN VIEWPOINTS.
>> IN FACT THEY ARE CREATING
CONTENT DEVIN NUNES SUING
TWITTER ABOUT CREATE CONTENT
CANNOT CALL THEM A TEXT
PLATFORM JOOIR UNDER THE LAW
COMPANIES ARE NOT CONSIDERED
MEDIA COMPANIES THEY CANNOT BE
SUED FOR DEFAMATION THAT WAS A
LAW PASSED IN MID 90S, REALLY
AT VERY BEGINNING OF THE
GROWTH IN THE INTERNET.
>> THAT IS GOING TO BE FOR
REASONS ARTICULATED REEXAMINED
THIS IS THE WILD WEST WHETHER
OR NOT YOU CAN ACCOMPLISH
SOMETHING YOU KNOW IS FALSE,
ONE THING FOR THEM TO SAY
NAPOLITANO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT
HE IS TALKING ABOUT IF THEY
ACCOMPLIS
CCOMPLIS
PUBLISH SOMETHING THEY KNOW IS
FALSE SERIOUS ISSUE.
DAGEN: I WANT TO ADD ONE
THING TO WHAT JUDGE WAS
TALKING ABOUT TWO SEPARATE
STORIES IN "WALL STREET
JOURNAL," THAT JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT, THE BROAD REVIEW
OF THE BIKE TECH COMPANIES FOR
-- INTO ANTITRUST ISSUES, AND
ANOTHER STORY IN "THE WALL
STREET JOURNAL," MENTIONED
EARLIER ON THE SHOW APPLE
DOMINATES APP STORE SEARCH
RESULT
THWARTING COMPETITORS AUDIO
BOOK, OTHER COMPANIES
DEVELOPERS -- UNFAIR APPLE
SAYS SOI.H WELL OUR ALGORITHM
DOESN'T INTO THAT HOW MANY
TIMES HAVE WE HEARD THAT.
>> THE ALGORITHM APPLE PUT UP
APPLE STORE INVESTED TIME AND
MONEY INTO APPLE STORE I THINK
THE ARGUMENT CAN BE MADE THEY
CAN PROMOTE THEIR PRODUCT, AND
JUDGE WAS SAYING IF YOU DON'T
LIKE IT, ABOUT AS A DEVELOPER,
YOU CAN CHOOSE TO ONLY SERVE
PUT YOUR PRODUCT ON ANDROID,
GOOGLE'S PLATFORM I THINK
ULTIMATELY THING WILL BE FOR
THE BIG TECH COMPANIES LIKE IF
YOU ARE AWARE YOU THE PUBLIC
KNOW, YOU GO ON GOOGLE YOU
SEARCH FOR SOMETHING, YOU ARE
GOING TO GET A --
ANTICONSERVATIVE BUYS OR LEFT
WING TYPE BIAS THEN YOU MAY
CHOOSE A DIFFERENT SEARCH
ENGINE I THINK THE ULTIMATELY
THING HERE WILL BE THEM
POLICING THEMSELVES AND IF
APPLE IS GOING TO PROMOTE
THEIR PRODUCTS ABOVE SOMEONE
ELSE'S NOW YOU KNOW ABOUT IT,
BUT YOU CAN CHOOSE DEAL WITH
IT GO ELSEWHERE.
>> LYNCHPIN OF ALL CRIMINAL
ANTITRUST PROSECUTION IS WAS
THE CONSUMER HARMED IF
GOVERNMENT CAN'T SHOW HARM TO
CONSUMER DOESN'T MATTER APPLE
FAERZ ITS OWN PRODUCTS.
>> DEVIN NUNES WAS HARMED.
>> THAT IS NOT CRIMINAL, NOW
--
>> HE WAS HARMED, TECHS --
>> WHETHER DEVIN NUNES WAS