WOULD SAY MADDIE WAS HER PLUS
ONE FOREVER.
>> Ashley: THANK YOU, BROOKE.
BRING IN FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST
DR. MICHAEL BODIN.
I WANT TO GO TO THE EVIDENCE
SIDE OF THIS, ARE YOU AT ALL
CONCERNED ABOUT HOW MUCH TIME
HAS GONE BY?
WE ARE AT THE EIGHT-DAY MARK AS
FAR AS COLLECTING EVIDENCE AND
YOU TALK ABOUT FINGERPRENTS AND
IF THERE WERE GLOVES, IT DOESN’T
MATTER, THEY WOULD STILL BE ABLE
TO TRACK SOMEBODY DOWN
POTENTIALLY WITH THAT?
>> IF THERE WAS BLOOD BEING
SPREAD AROUND, HOWEVER, D.N.A.
ESPECIALLY CAN BE GOTTEN BY JUST
TOUCH D.N.A. IF A PERSON IS NOT
WEARING GLOVES OR BY THE PERSON
CUTTING THEMSELVES ON THE BLOODY
KNIFE THAT HE IS STABBING PEOPLE
WITH OR BY THE FINGERNAIL SCRAPING FROM THE PERSONS WHO
SCRAPING FROM THE PERSONS WHO
ARE RECEIVING DEFENSIVE WOUNDS,
MAY HAVE SCRATCHED AN
INDIVIDUAL.
THE FINGERNAIL SCRATCHING D.N.A.
THEY WOULD HAVE FROM THE
AUTOPSIES.
IF THERE WAS A SEXUAL ASSAULT,
WHICH THERE WASN’T, THEY WOULD
HAVE THAT FROM THE AUTOPSY AND
COULD HAVE BEEN WORKING FROM THE
DAY OF AUTOPSY.
AT THE SCENE, HAVE TO BE LOOKING
FOR BLOOD FROM THE PERPETRATOR
OR TOUCH D.N.A. IF HE WASN’T
WEARING GLOVEINGS.
THEY HAVEN’T SAID ANYTHING ABOUT
WORKER
WORKER GLOVES AND IT WOULD GIVE
AN IDEA THERE WAS PREPLANNING TO
THE ASSAULT, IF HE HAD GOTTEN
GLOVES BEFORE THE ASSAULT. THEY
HAVE NOT GIVEN INFORMATION AS TO
WHERE THE BODIES WERE BODY, THEY
SAID IN BED, WHICH WOULD INDICATE THEY HAD GONE TO BED.
INDICATE THEY HAD GONE TO BED.
IF THERE WAS TARGETED D.N.A., AS
TED WILLIAMS EXPRESSED.
TWO PEOPLE WERE THERE WERE NOT
HARMED.
>> Todd: IN YOUR EXPERIENCE, ARE
POLICE RELEASING SO LITTLE
INFORMATION BECAUSE THEY DON’T
WANT TO TIP OFF THE KILLER OR
KILLERS THAT THEY ARE GETTING
CLOSE TO FINDING THEM OR DO THEY
NOT HAVE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
WE’RE RAISING ON OUR SHOW AND
OTHER SHOWS?
>> VERY GOOD QUESTION FROM YOU.
TRADITIONALLY, POLICE DON’T LIKE
TO RELEASE INFORMATION OR ALERT
BAD GUYS TO WHAT THEY KNOW AND
DON’T KNOW.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THERE IS
GROUP SOURCING WHAT IS GOING ON,
AN AWFUL LOT OF INFORMATION ARE
COMING FROM PEOPLE WATCHING THE
SHOW AND SEE THINGS OR PEOPLE
WHO KNOW SOME OF THE DECEDENTS
OR THE PARENTS, A LOT OF
DIFFERENT SOURCES COMING OUT FOR
INFORMATION, ONE THING THE PRESS
CONFERENCE YESTERDAY GAVE VERY
LITTLE, BUT SOME INFORMATION IS
NOT VALID.
IN GENERAL, THE POLICE LIKE TO
HOLD ON TO THINGS, ALTHOUGH ONE
SEES A WEEK LATER, TIRE MARKS,
THERE IS CONCERN, TIRE MARKS
CHANGE IN A WEEK, WEATHER
CONDITIONS.
ALSO THEY CAME OUT WITH THAT
OTHER PEOPLE WERE THERE BEFORE
THE POLICE WERE CALLED, THERE
ARE THINGS AT THE PRESS
CONFERENCE THAT SAID ONE GIRL’S
PHONE WAS USED, BUT THEY DON’T
KNOW WHO USED IT AND INDICATE
THERE MAY BE OTHER PEOPLE USING
THE PHONE TO CALL POLICE MAKE IT
CONFUSING, A LOT OF CONFUSING
INFORMATION COMING FROM THE
POLICE ALSO.
>> Ashley: WHAT CAN WE CONCLUDE
BASE ON THE CORONER’S REPORT?
>> CORONER SHOULD KNOW IF
SOMEBODY WAS MORE VICIOUSLY
ATTACKED, THEY MIGHT HAVE BEEN A
TARGET AND THE OTHERS WAKE UP
AND HE GETS RID OF THE ONES THAT
CAN IDENTIFY HIM, GIVES
IMPRESSION THEY WERE KILLED BY
SOMEBODY THEY KNEW OTHERWISE WHY
WOULD HE KILL EVERYBODY?
THE TWO PEOPLE WHO WEREN’T
KILLED WERE PEOPLE THAT DIDN’T
SEE HIM.
IT SOUNDS LIKE IT COULD BE
SOMETHING INTERNAL, BUT WE DON’T
KNOW, USUALLY HAVE LOVE, HATE,
MONEY ISSUE THE THINGS THAT
CAUSE MURDER.
SOME INFORMATION IS CONFUSING.
>> Todd: A SAD, TRAGIC, HORRIBLE
SITUATION, WE HOPE TO GET TO THE