radium one CEO up gurbaksh
Cup cahall our charla should say
has been I charger was charged with
I felonies 4 assaulting his girlfriend he was caught
in a 30-minute video surveillance tape a beating his girlfriend because she
allegedly cheated on him
I'll do in a recent trip to Vegas home security footage reportedly showed
should call beating and kicking his girlfriend 117 times during the third
30 min attack so this goes to court
and interestingly enough the outcome of the case is that he will serve
absolutely no time in prison
but he will get probation so let me give you the charges or I should say I his
exact up
sentence so three years probation 52 weeks in a domestic violence training
program 25 hours of community service
that extremely light considering the fact that he hit his girlfriend
hopefully at this point ex-girlfriend 117 times
in that tape now let me give you the really quick I technicalities that he
was able to get off on
so first the wall the police apparently
obtain that tape a legally I apparently they didn't do so with legal means so as
a result that the judge was
unable to use that point ages evidence in the case so there's a technicality
right there
also after he hired a former prosecutor as a defense attorney
here a girlfriend decided that he she no longer wanted to
participate or cooperate in the trial and to let the big problem because
obviously you need her testimony you need her to cooperate
so he originally had a felony charges but those charges were later dropped two
misdemeanor charges
P pleaded guilty to misdemeanor domestic violence and battery
so but that's how exactly how the rich wind up having advantage overall
sprayed so the of course the most relevant part of the story was when you
started by saying take millionaire
and you knew what that was going to be for 117 blows
you you're ready to 117 months or weeks or days in jail
nobody thought that we know how that story was good and everybody knew how to
serve as an
so it's not just that that people
judges are more sympathetic to the rich which they are like so for example the
situation where the dupont airhead rape his own kids
the judge said he wouldn't fare well in prison like 10 poor people and
middle-class people they would fare perfectly well in prison that's where
they belong right but this rich guy was
I mean he doesn't belong in prison so wouldn't fare well I you know in the
afterwards a kid you know they X it it seem like the judge thought
well I mean could happen anybody ride in this case
maybe there was something I had to but there is also a little bit of the OJ
situation
where you hire great lawyers cuz your age and then all of a sudden they
realize
they find a way that they to make a tape inadmissible
and then you get a good enough defense attorney that I don't know she was
intimidated by the paper is a former prosecutor
I don't know what part of that change their mind but all of a sudden you lose
your best witness
and this is how moneywise are being a gigantic advantage that
if you think a regular dude in Cleveland White Black Latino doesn't matter at all
peter is girlfriend a 117 times over the course but
thirty-minute attack over and over and over again
a working-class guy that he wouldn't wind up in jail
was here do you define experts on the camera
he's gonna find a former prosecutor to represent a their biennial that's up
easy here's what is gonna buy
a jail cell yet there is a double standard in our justice system if you
come from a lower socioeconomic status
your unlikely to get away with the light sentences this guy has or as that
16-year-old Apple when the kid did
and it's really really depressing to know that that's the case because this
woman
was beaten for 30 minutes straight there's
video surveillance ovett honestly I know that we have laws in place that's top
cops from obtaining evidence illegally and it's important to have those laws in
in place
but if this surveillance exists and you have hardcore evidence and proof that
this guy was beating someone
how are you gonna say no we can't use that evidence based on a technicality
that makes me so angry and
again I understand why we have those laws in place so it doesn't change the
fact that the evidence exists well
solicitors exam actually a conservative on this and I was in law school to
I always thought that was the wrong rule that you throw out the evidence when he
threw out the evidence because all you do is hurting the victim
what you should do is punish the cops who got illegally it's still exists
use it in the trial right but then say hey cobb
you did something wrong and getting that tape so punish the the guy who did
committed the assault and punish the cops cuz they both did something wrong
right but are you sure the cops won't even attempt to get the
the ads for the problem that I know and then that's a valid criticism over
my position on that and look if they did equally
and they throughout or day worse meticulous
in delivering justice to everybody and they threw out the evidence in the case
so
the poor the middle class all the time as well there may be a live with it a
little bit more but
the reality is its it's the rich could afford great lawyers
who wind up taking advantage of those things a lot more and just to give you a
sense of how wealthy this guy is when he was 16 he was already a
multi-millionaire he was self-made it's not like he inherited the wealth
just to give you an idea he sold his first all I'd ad network
click agents dot com Inc to value click Inc
at the age of 16 per twenty point five million in stock seven years later he
sold blue lithium
Inc which he also founded to Yahoo for $300 million in cash
unbelievably well then he should get off I mean I know he was that rich
so steamboat well who's our CEO here but we use peer former prosecutor in los
angeles
it makes it a good point about Heather how the rich have another advantage
which is that
when they come out with attorneys and they can extend
with the proceedings right whether it's a trial whatever it might be
and it's gonna cost the government a lot of money and a lotta resources
whereas they can take that money and resources and use it to intimidate
people who don't have those high-powered attorneys
into getting a lot more plea deals great so when they come into
loaded with you know with attorneys
he knows to his experiences bosses would say back just group let 'em of a delay
or set its own shoes
okay laziness is a virus yeah and they said look we go but we have so many
cases a go through we don't have enough money to do it
and I understand that point a view to so it's a combination of those things
look something that you just can't solve the richer of course by definition
always gonna have
more money and then allow more lawyers I just wish they didn't add that extra
layer on top that we've seen recently with affluence a case in the DuPont case
where they go out there rich they don't really belong in jail
me that's further average man
not for someone who's million