it's thursday in time for world view we dennis campbell dennis is editor in
chief of u_k_ progressive magazine also author of the book billionaire boys
election freak show
that issue coming to us today at with with what could be at huge huge story
we've been covering potential election fraud in a regular tees for quite some
time now we recently had the story linking tag romney to some of the voting
machines in ohio
but now you're in touch with a former n_s_a_ agent who believes he has
uncovered uh... actual election fraud on on behalf of the romney campaign tell us
about
well it's not just the raw meat and a huge the g_o_p_ in general
none of the background and history i had been writing stories about election
fraud in arizona
since two thousand six there was a bond issue election there
but that's very funny numbers i got to talk to a group of people down there
who have been trying out for the better part of six years
to construct an actual paper trail so they can see what happened in this
particular election their work in this regard has been going on for six years
just in that
the gentleman who i'm associated with this
the former n_s_a_ uh... analyst is named is michael donna hall
now michael and i had a relationship a friendship from the seventeen years we
were neighbors uh... when we lived back in maryland in the united states many
years ago so i've known him for quite some time very soft-spoken
understated sort of gentleman a true analysts in every sense of works he was
at the lake by somebody to report
uh... this to report abuse by a gentleman by the name of chad cavalry
just get his uh... his first name all friends foster's death
and james johnson
dot what happened is that francois was uh... looking at
election results and an election observer
through the south carolina primary
made an observation it said she vote number or of uh... voters for romney
you showing up and characteristically hai
rate of return
and that was questioning and questionable
so check out their jobs and there are a couple of analysts they went back to
date looks bad
all the votes of is happy with the invented seeking to stay
and they saw
shocking sort of uh...
uh... correlation
between the size of the precincts of the launch of the precincts the more votes
tended to go up for romney
and down for everybody else somewhat but they're for second
must play devil's advocate as we go here
is it not possible based on we're gonna go piece-by-piece but based on what
you've just said is it not possible there's something about romney voters
that in more populated counties tends to direct them to mit romney instead of the
other republican candidates is that not a possibility
at some very good question and that's one of the first place is doing they're
analyst over there were two men look
they wanted to find out what was causing this deviation because
if u are having a similar result being your medium sized armed of counties
then the number should stay relatively flat all the way through
you shouldn't be seeing as the county gets bigger
the numbers changing because obviously
if you put it on the statistical variances anywhere between eight and ten
percent
meaning a twenty-percent ceiling either way four romy
and that was something that was quite puzzling to them they went back and they
looked at all fifty states in the primaries and this information is
something that everybody can get
directly from the secretary of state
you can get the wrong vote totals body precinct
it every one of the fifty states
so they wedded and they gathered all that data
and they put it into an excel spreadsheet with invested each of the
precincts in numerical order
the vote count
and the candidates than what they did
was they put in a set the trap of problems to the side
so that they could then figure out okay
let's sort these from highest to lowest so that we would have
you know those that only have a few don rickles is increasing
they would appear at the top all the way down to those at the bottom
and then they used it
calculations is c
what the statistical variance laws
and what we saw with what i mentioned before
that the bigger the up three say what was happening was the number of votes
for romney in percentage was rising
and we saw speedily arizona which is where of michael barone host concern
that the vote totals for us and for the wrong paul
correspondingly went down so let me know if they're here a on what we mean by
bigger precincts are we talking about
uh... uh... physical size total population or what are we talking about
science of this uh... you know that the longer the precinct
set the goal is worth the life of the precinct is
the easy period is the heidi anything that's going on like that of if
interested more in a very very small precinct provided so that i don't think
the areas that could be could be significant and could be found out that
you're sick a bigger precinct is one that has more voters
more votes cast more votes cast okay so that's about the soul
fully based on the role of oak casks totals right that they're able to get
directly from the secretary of state so this really throws out the idea that
it's a density thing meaning in more carbon densely populated areas mit
romney is work activities were simply talking about the total number of votes
cast not more popping up more densely populated precinct but simply the
precinct
with more people in them
again these guys are analyst assistant job
that was something doesn't make sense they started to deeper into the data to
see if they can find an answer
and when you're looking at you know something such as the percentage it
should remain constant throughout
but when you see any widely divergent changed that's when things start yet
very interesting
it and the reason for it and apparently this that they've gone back now and
they've looked at
not just primaries but they've looked at general elections they voted
gubernatorial election senatorial elections
and what they found that if there was a difference of ten percent
uh... the or more
there was no way that this face that was put in there was going to affected one
way or the other server you will get up
something like andrew resemble
she won by a very small percentage
this would have had an impact on it
whereas if you look at president obama with
is nine million votes hoping huge victory in two thousand any no fixed
with a change in the back got one hundred and we've reduced his overall
dot alitalia number of votes
arthur any states where this pattern
is not there and what can we deduce from that
know the pattern than the pattern is so consistent
that pizza just that
had to have happened at a central office level
so indeed could very well be that one person in each of these five companies
would set this ten percent number whatever it is
in place
the computer automatically reasons streams out whatever needed needs to do
to raise the total one loads golu rather there's an old fill out there called
hacking democracy and there's a thing called a kirsty hack
i highly recommend you view is that they take a look at it because
he shows how simple it is to to at the memory card level to take these voting
machines in the new it delayed as well as at the central tabulation level this
suggests is this is an even higher level
and that brings into question although the investors is that you were talking
about yesterday
so we have to ask the question
if this is so wide-ranging uh... wide why is there no what why don't we have
way more information pointing et to whoever did that are the culprits here
and who are the culprits here what is the accusation
that's the question
we don't know what we do know with what we do know is that beats only seems to
be
positively affecting
republican candidates
so for example if you look at gabriella difference uh... twenty twenty ten
election which is what michael did in his analysis
he saw
that in fact instead of her winning by a razor thin the less than one percent
because the the votes with virgin america went down
as the republican challenger calley went up you saw that you know she should have
actually won by somewhere around about nineteen or twenty percent
so it is significant numbers
john mccain was not affected because he was outside that ten percent
margin of manipulation anything more than that
would raise red flags the whole idea behind this
is to leave
uh... you know unmask sort of behind result but
i'm proud to be able to go to u_k_ progressive magazine
take a look at the heart of gold more important
and look at the the report
from tricare and johnson because
that shows you how they did it and they're into exactly what
what uh... uh... mitigate and i've actually gotten me he's
tstranship michael t spreadsheet
the the the report that they can't download
and they can actually see the numbers all have to do
is replaced precinct numbers
with their own precinct numbers candidates votes
and see if it does that i'd pretty much guarantee that is going to who's going
to show
again that there's this huge statistical various won't pay there should be one
okenka rich people to head over to you can progressive check it out we'll see
what the reaction is to this will see how far this goes and what the potential
effects in the presidential election are
we've been speaking with dennis campbell who's the editor in chief of u_k_
progressive magazine
dennis thanks as always
but they do