good
the well
it on person dunce is under fire once again
days after coming under fire for her sexist
rather anti-feminist comments about gender roles
within the household Kristen dust Dunst
is at it again claiming the headlines for
implying in an interview with an editor from W magazine
it women who were sexually assaulted in Holland letter asking for it
the interviewer past want to direct your chances are you won't
working has that ever happened Kristen Dunst responds by saying
no you and chuckling and goes on to say
I don't give off that five I think the you I think that you court
that stuff and to me it's crossing a boundary
that were it was hinder the trust in your working relationship
now this seems pretty obvious to me it seems pretty blatant more than just a
mere implication
she's saying if you don't wanna be insulted then you shouldn't well
work that still dust is still coming
is still causing outrage among many people for her recent declaration that
he
men to be men and women to be women within the household because
that's just the way relationships are supposed to word so what do you guys
think
okay so it's kinda funny you're asking a pain of love math
book but I love permanence the ship arm Cervelli recalled we're all terrified
the answer
at a little little ironic but I'll a okay so
what i think is a term obviously nobody's asking for it
and so the the implication
what she's saying is basically well you can bring it on yourself in court that
behavior
you bring it upon yourself she consulted don't be surprised it's %uh it seems
like it's
where those things maybe we're taking her out on tax I did not die really sure
I don't know all that much workers Dunst what
it seems like she's charter plane that are
blame the victim mentality if you get assaulted that's your fault
you should have courted that all well
sad day for you Rick mather
I I tried to remain rather skeptical ok
he article because I know that people can often be taken out of context but in
this situation it seems to be pretty
latenan cleared exactly was asking how it was answered
time but yeah basically it seems pretty obvious
it done she's not particularly interested
being being but then Minister per woman in any way
and feels until I open who
me hostile even some turns towards her a
fellow women for
I mean it seems very nasty to ply
the any woman would be bringing it upon herself
when a director attacked her
and sexually Salzer I like stony
between the two comments that she made I think the ones that come the gender
roles in
men being men and women being women hassle a bit more egregious
and I agree I light I do you think these com
these concept native comments abouts axes
and bring it on themselves they can acticin metzner
I think they could possibly be yet be slightly taken out of context it may be
sold
the overall flow the rest to the issue that my slightly change your opinion
watches may be hinting at to me night I mean obviously
that no woman this meet at my house is acting as the potentially cousins could
have been
trying to get across the point now do women
sometimes put themselves in kinda stupid situation this than 80 being a bit
naive and stuff if they've maybe had a bit too much to drink
they can put themselves in stupid situations and there are
have a number of times they do with its yet not even just in that kinda the
celebrity worship coming up in the acting world
Justin kinda clubs and pubs across the entire world
because we do that all the time last still doesn't mean that
you know that they deserve to be cast sexually assaulted or anything
yes winning and not and men as well can buttons and sleepy situations and I
think that point was just
women can sometimes maybe be a bit naive a naughty she knows but the acting
world and she's probably seen unknown a number of
Canada's female acquaintances is gone into Canada's
directing kind of town schools and stuff like that and have maybe
gone into in a bit naively am NOT possibly thinking license in Isaac could
come up
and that's maybe why she has a bit a great sin sin is she elaborated on that
point a bit more
then made her comments would seem ads
stupid as they are so that was it completely content and I think she
she maybe she should come out and terrified position then again it's
Kirsten Dunst let's be honest you
really cares what she thinks you can think whatever the hell she likes it so
i'm concerned.
great and that's true and i felt that way at first to its like
whatever's your opinion is nor
shouldn't be exactly is your opinion man
ray its supposedly it's just her opinion she's just a celebrity who cares but
then I thought about it and I was like
and I thought more important Kirstin Dunst
single EU is the world view as a whole
it her view represents regarding women gender
feminism and great any there's just something screwed up
about the society the chinks
there women are bringing it upon themselves lennart
that actor salted you shoulda known that was gonna happen
are you shouldn't 30 with and why did you go in wearing that
and also Kristen Dunst whether we like it or not
axe as a role model too many people
in many women especially and so it can be
it can be rather significantly in nature major
the in celebrities
in public figures hope these trips opinions
I out I need to defend her from a completely different angle
bins into 1 there's lotta merit what everybody said
and I'm human a little bit uncomfortable
with a with what Stephen said all
not that I don't think it's true well I think it's kinda act because that is
reality right like
who you put yourself in these in less than why situations and bad things
happen
but I think we have to be really really careful
and really really vigilant to draw difference between
acknowledging that unfortunate reality acquiescing that reality
and acting like the owners then is on people to to not do that rather than to
change that reality
it is a very it's a it's a good-hearted thingy
in 20 bearing at bay my mother well thank you thank you
but you know they mean well and and and it is true but
but at the ended the day you know it oversimplified but you know
all maybe instead a you know or there's the chart says you know like what causes
rapes and it's like you know women startling
now the idea the bottom one is rapist and 100 percent the answer is
rapist I'm answer is 0 you know idea what's even saying I get that it's true
but we just we can't be
you know we can't be resigned but who knows no matter what situation you put
yourself in
you're still not asking for it so right
right at that's the overall point and that's what away I think
well I think there's another is actually saying I feel like
things are working against her and I don't follow written hollywood in
general
all that well and really not even her hier
her even less so I should say um but a
are she's wonderful actors that are claiming answer destroy everything out
of our
um but I anyway um
what's working against her is the fact that this came on the heels or at least
got picked up on the hills above
apparently some unfortunate comments that she made you know fairly recently
and so like it kinda creates that environment you know where were quick to
21 again up or but whenever I read the actual quote here
I feel like we're where really
in forming a lotta context here an- framing this in a way that I don't know
the quote ask itself to be framed yeah I i'm
I'm leery about saying what is a is it going on in some wanted anyway claire
had people do that about me
and its I feel pretty horrible people that about me and misjudge me but I am
but so that's it the question is what are the director pounces on you are
working has that ever happened she says no
last I don't give off that vibe so that part does cannot speak to what you guys
are saying
but here's what I think we're missing what she actually said I think you court
that stuff and to me it's crossing a boundary
that would hinder the trust in you working relationship I think what she's
saying
is empowering if he knows that she's saying you don't have to sleep your way
to the top she's not talking about women
who get raped because they put may ask for she's talking about women
who willfully you know sleep with their bosses or whatever because they think
that's the only way to succeed
as you say you don't have to do that you're a strong intelligent woman you're
talented
I didn't have to do that look at me I made it you can do it too
and the reason why I really think that's the case is because she says
it's crossing a boundary that would hinder the trust in your relationship
that's but that's religion language
that's not taking advantages rate that's
that saying like you are willfully making a relationship
a knot strictly professional relationship and trying to manipulate
personally at your own expense
you know I'll be enough because that's the society we live in
where women have to perfil like nafta grade themselves
to get ahead and I think she what what she's really saying here's don't do that
and because up this kinda down comment that she may
made in the past what were quick to judge in completely
reinterpret what you actually said and I certainly hope that
your theory is is absolutely right you know because
I do agree with that I think that too excellent point in if she had made a
excellent point
I you know hey rate
still doesn't remove the unfortunate comment from before
which is once again unfortunate
but nonetheless if this comment is what you you know
is interpreted in the way that you're interpreting it Jordan done absolutely
agree
at least she gets some our credibility back
not that Leighton her credibility me really but it matters