YESTERDAY THE HOUSE VOTED TO ELIMINATE INTERNET PRIVACY
PROTECTIONS SET UP UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, PAVING THE
WAY FOR CORPORATIONS TO TRACK YOUR PRIVATE BROWSING DATA, THEN
TAKE IT AND SELL IT TO ADVERTISERS.
THE ACTUAL PATH
THEY TOOK IS SIMPLE.
WE CAN READ
THE ENTIRETY OF THE BILL.
TRUMP HAS SIGNED THE BILL.
THEY ARE
NOT IN FAVOR OF THE CONSUMER
PROTECTIONS, AND PEOPLE ARE UPSET.
THE RULES WERE STILL
BEING DRAFTED.
THEY WERE BEING DISCUSSED
AND INVESTIGATED.
WE
KNOW FROM HACKS AND LEAKS, EVENTUALLY A LOT OF THAT
INFORMATION CAN BE RELEASED.
THERE WAS A HUGE YAHOO HACK A
500 MILLION ACCOUNTS.
ACTIVISTS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS.
WE
HAVE A QUOTE FROM EVAN GREER, AN INTERNET PRIVACY ACTIVISM
ORGANIZATION.
WHEN YOU ALLOW THESE CORPORATIONS TO TRACK THIS
INFORMATION THEY WILL SET UP THE TECHNOLOGICAL MEANS TO DO SO.
THAT THEN IS ABLE TO BE HACKED
AND LEAKED BY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WHO DON'T SIMPLY
WANT TO PROFIT OFF OF IT.
IT IS EXPECTED THAT IT WILL NOW BE
SIGNED.
IT WAS ALREADY PASSED IN THE SENATE.
I LIKE THAT SOME FOLKS ARE BEGINNING TO SPEAK LIKE ME NOW.
EVAN ALSO SAID, "CONGRESS SHOULD
KNOW BY NOW THAT WHEN YOU COME FOR THE INTERNET, THE INTERNET
COMES FOR YOU."
THAT HAS GOOD PUNCH.
LET'S GIVE YOU A SENSE OF
THE STUFF THEY CAN DO.
AS NANCY PELOSI POINTED OUT IT IS DEEPLY
PERSONAL INFORMATION, WHERE YOU ARE, WHAT YOU WANT TO KNOW,
EVERY SITE YOU VISIT.
IF YOU ARE IN PRIVATE BROWSING MODE, YOU
THOUGHT IT WAS PRIVATE.
SOMEONE AT THE VERGE MADE A GREAT
POINT, REPUBLICANS FRAME THIS AS CONSUMER CHOICE AND FREE
MARKETS.
WHO WOULD CHOOSE TO HAVE ALL THEIR PRIVATE
INFORMATION GIVEN TO A PUBLIC CORPORATION WHICH CAN PROFIT OFF
OF IT AND NOT SHARE PROFITS?
THERE ARE SOME EXHIBITIONIST, WE DON'T WANT TO FRAME THEM.
IT IS ABOUT THESE COMPANIES THAT HAVE GREASED THESE
REPUBLICANS.
IN THIS CASE IT WAS A PARTYLINE VOTE, GIVE CREDIT TO
THE DEMOCRATS, NONE OF THEM
VOTED FOR IN THE HOUSE. 15 REPUBLICANS CROSSED OVER AND
VOTED THE RIGHT WAY. 265 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, REPUBLICAN, SAID WE
DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR
INTERNET PRIVACY.
MY CORPORATE FRIENDS WHO DONATED MONEY TO ME
WILL NOW GET A LOT MORE MONEY
FROM YOU GUYS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.
IN THAT SAME VERGE ARTICLE THEY DID A GREAT JOB AT GOING
BACK IN THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
WE ARE USED TO WHEN
IT COMES TO ENERGY OR THE MILITARY, THESE HUGE SUMS OF
MONEY BEING THROWN AT THESE
PEOPLE.
WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE HOW CHEAP IT WAS FOR THEM TO BUY
PEOPLE WHEN IT CAME TO YOUR
INTERNET PRIVACY.
WE WILL SHOW YOU SOME OF THE REPUBLICANS, HOW
MUCH THEY GOT FOR THE TELECOMS.
LET'S BRING THIS UP.
RALPH ABRAHAM GOT $5750, AND HE SOLD
IT OUT FOR YOU.
MARK WAS WILLING TO SELL YOU OUT FOR NOTHING.
THERE WERE SOME PEOPLE THEY GOT 60,000, 80,000, BUT IT IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO THE COST OF
RUNNING AN ELECTION.
THEY WERE STILL WILLING TO SELL YOU OUT ON IT.
TO BE FAIR TO THESE CONGRESSMEN WHO ARE BUT CHEAP,
THIS IS PER ELECTION.
REMEMBER EVERY ELECTION THEY COME BACK.
THIS IS LIKE AN OPEN AUCTION, PUBLIC BRIBERY, WE JUST MADE IT
LEGAL.
ALSO SOME OF THEM GOT HIGHER NUMBERS.
THEIR PRICES ARE
BASED ON DIFFERENT FACTORS INCLUDING SENIORITY AND WHETHER
THEY ARE THE CHAIR OF THE
COMMITTEE.
IF THEY ARE THE CHAIR OF YOUR COMMITTEE YOU HAVE TO
BRIBE THEM EVEN MORE.
THERE IS CORPORATE CHOICE, NO CONSUMER
CHOICE.
WOLF ñ PAC.COM.