he has been decided we had fear that this was going to happen now it is
pinning an alice present all bomb a but his movie where he's going to accept the
democratic party's nomination
uh... so
whereas in a beat
well present all mama it will be accepting his party's nomination
at bank of america field in north carolina
cannot imagine
were symbolism
the reason i can't imagine it is because there is no goldman sachs stated
i'll put other that bank of america
is filled out a bat is reputation well-earned well-deserved as anyone in
the country
and president mama who has been fighting for the banks all along
willing accept the nomination in
bank of america state
now so the news reports and i tell you that it's because they want to do in a
larger venue
uh... the head of the d_n_c_ deborah wasserman schultz is just so many people
i come to the convention
uh... we wanted all than to be able to attend that's why we're doing it
outdoors as we did
last time in denver
i'm sure the some of that is spared true
abut have also read a report
that they want more luxury boxes for their top dog
that's for the reason they move to the bank of america stick
bucket now it was just symbolism
he said well what can they do the review in north carolina
the stadium nearby happens to be bank of america
and you know a north carolina's an important swing state he barely one last
summer i understand all that right
but it's not just symbolism it's also reality
the president while mine is about to undo his budget
and he's been saying all along
hey you know what don't worry this year on actually have a progressive
and i'm going to prioritize adding jobs over uh...
cutting of spending and cutting our dept
now that's what he'd been promising that's who likes the
talk to talk a lot wild
you know campaigning as a so-called progressive
will once again to do is you know walked the walk was what's about to come out
so are what is the white house doing
uh... they are according to the hill going two different a progressive groups
and democratic legislators and telling them
prepare to get disappointed
quoting the hilliard
top white house officials or warning liberal and labor leaders
to brace themselves
for president or bombers
budget proposal
cuz apparently it is going to be fairly devastate
there's going to be more spending cuts
it is going to do deftly be a less uh... than the budget that he proposed last
year
which a lot of
progressives work understandably i'm mad at infact some of the african-american
leaders in congress
uh... that uh... it was uh... taking away
uh... power from the powerless already
uh... peter walsh a democrat of vermont said people will literally freeze given
that take uh... given the cuts that they were making that
home heating oil
head of the congressional black caucus emmanuel cleaver said we cannot win the
future by leaving our most vulnerable bhi hai
does not last year's budget issues but apparently he's going to be more
draconian
worse cuts
so they do in a politically savvy move of letting
apparently leading lou liberal leaders know whether their legislators about are
there any liberal leaders left the country with a talking to you
anyway they and tell them all by the way
overtaking about all the elections are
will come this for you again
but when they did the all put our hands are tied
we made a deal with the republicans
there we would cut spending like crazy in the middle of
tough economic times
when we're trying to have jobs we can do instead of a cut spending
and cost us jobs but what made you know what the republicans were going to but
that's why complain about your d on the first place
that's what we said it was a bad idea to cut trillions of dollars in spending
in the middle of top economic facts
and as a prop up the calypso level is the real
and now here they are and they're saying sat there for you
obligation labor
uh... don't worry we're not a cut the department of labor
including doctor shel safety and health administration
and my safety health administration i'd believe them
but then here's a funpar they say we will seek to preserve funding for the
national labor relations board
that these national labor relations board it was nice knowing
uh... would be eliminated that's probably way too strong would be cut
definitely
if they are seeking to preserve it that measles x always receiving a bizarre all
potluck at all because of the republicans
we couldn't quite preserve it in the shape it was
now the republicans would have they been attacking the most the national labor
relations board
so what so bombing of a deal as always who's gonna cave in to them and say
there is nothing you can do solid he's a present the united states or anything
well you know those ones are nothing to do the financial transaction tax
so you would have to cut spending so much you one casa so many jobs u_n_ and
people who are already at work or in bad shape meeting at a little heating oil
for the winter
never know with the new that here but we don't know what did you get a financial
transaction facts
becca pay for all this so you do you think that
anytime percentage
for every transaction of the banks to it lowers speculation so sexy and that
positive
any gives you the money that you need
of course
uh... president obama's top economic advisers
who had told you over and over again are deeply conservative all-pro banker just
decided i want to look as though we can't go financial transaction tax
now that would be too much faster the banks gene sperling the director of the
national economic council says spare that he's not interested in that at all
and they say you know what administration officials worry the
republicans could and i'm quoting hillier
could frame the proposal is a tax on for one
cave retirement funds
potentially damaging election year charge a pop pop pop
yet we don't resent him back some of the x
their problems will claim you do it on the four o_ one k_ is and that's why
you're not doing my
gosh that's why you're not doing it you're not doing 'cause your holy funded
by the backs 'cause you're in the pocket of the banks just like the republicans
are
that's why you're not going to do a financial transaction tax but would be a
tiny tiny percentage point no three percent
you're not going to do that na week
harm the banks just a little bit you wouldn't have rocked the banks
well you can do your speech acceptance speech at the bank of america
stadium but you would wanna that bank of america
i'm pretending that you care about our core one case
and that would be good
that it would be damaging free election
if you had tax on the banks
if you think that was the world's worse politician
but nobody can possibly think
honor in this current election climate
if we did it i a tax on the banks of the american people would not be in favor of
that
if you actually believe that your job as a politician
but you don't actually believe that
your job is to protect the banks while pretending to be tough on them whetstone
financial report
go until your speech at bank of america statement there