It wasn't even a country, it's kinda concept, it's not even a country.
So when you talk about sovereignty and self determination, it's just a corrupt
area where the Clintons have turned into a colony where you can steal money out of.
>> We do have time why?
Because yesterday when Jang said that the right wing essentially supports Putin
twitter, especially that Right Wing twitter had a meltdown.
But we showed you the receipts essentially.
And with that new clip from Bannon.
Well he once again proved our point and in case you missed it.
Here's our compilation of Right Wingers cozying up with Putin.
>> Putin ain't woke, he is anti woke.
The Russians people still know which bathroom to use.
They know how many genders are there in Russia two.
>> Since the day that Donald Trump became president.
Democrats in Washington have told you have a patriotic duty to hate Vladimir Putin.
It's not a suggestion, it's a mandate.
Anything less than hatred for Putin is treason?
Many Americans have obeyed this directive?
They now dutifully hate Vladimir Putin?
Maybe you're one of them.
>> And I said this is genius.
Putin declares a big portion of Ukraine.
Putin declares it as independent.
That's wonderful.
>> Also remember the t shirts we saw Trump rallies.
I'd rather be Russian than a democrat has Putin ever called me a racist as he
threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him.
Has he shipped every middle class job in my town to Russia.
Did he manufacture a worldwide pandemic?
That wrecked my business and kept me indoors for two years.
Is he teaching my children to embrace racial discrimination?
Is he making friends, no?
Is he trying to snuff out Christianity?
Does he eat dogs?
These are fair questions.
And the answer to all of them is no Vladimir Putin didn't do any of that.
So why does permanent Washington hate him so much?
>> They don't have boys swimming in girls college swim meets backward.
>> It's embarrassing how savage, how medieval this is,
why this whole thing is a scam.
>> The Right Winger has continued to prove the point, and
Janke started this conversation.
So, I'll put it to you.
>> Hashtag Janke was right.
Okay, [LAUGH] guys, the reason why the banners and
tuck crosses the world, love Putin so
much is because he's an authoritarian white leader who says,
no, I'm against LGBTQ rights.
And is in favor of all of the right wing positions,
both on general issues, racial issues, on all of those issues.
Immigration issues, as as the Right Wingers here.
So, Bannon has talked a lot in his career about you need a strong man
to oppose minorities that are trying to immigrate into this country.
And he's unapologetic about it.
And so when he sees Putin doing it in Russia,
he thinks Atta Boy Tucker Carlson the same thing.
And they want those same authoritarian principles here?
Who cares?
Who's winning in elections Putin showed?
Well, you can begin to snuff out democracy and and make yourself leader for life.
And that way we don't ever have to listen to those minorities anymore.
That's the reason among the reasons why they love Putin, by the way,
it's not just Putin they've been doing accolades for Viktor Oban.
Whose another white Right Wing authoritarian leader in Hungary.
And he's also slowly ending democracy in Hungary.
Now given that they are losing power in this country and they think
demographically they will not be able to match the democrats going forward.
They're saying, well, better to be Russian, ie in their minds,
authoritarian, Right Wing, go back to oppressing minorities and
not really be democratic, as long as white people are still in charge.
And so when I said it, the Right Wing pretended that they were outraged.
And my favorite thing, guys, was there,
like show one example of a Right Wing pundit or leader supporting Putin,
kinda embarrassing guys, pretty obvious, Jackson, go ahead.
>> Yeah, I think that what's interesting here is that the way the Republican Party
and Republican influencers frame their message.
They really can't lose with their base because on the one hand they pushed this
side of why do we hate Putin?
Has he done this?
Has he done that?
Really just supporting his moves in any type of way they can, but on the other
hand, they say if Trump was in office, Putin wouldn't be doing what he's doing.
And I'm seeing that all over the internet and
I'm saying that all over the outlets as well.
So on the one hand it's good Putin is doing what he's doing, but on the other
hand he wouldn't be doing it were the clueless bozo, Donald Trump in office.
So again, they really can't lose, which is a good thing for them and
a horrible thing for them.
So and a horrible thing for the rest of us, obviously.
>> Yeah.
>> It's interesting to me as far as it concerns racism because a lot of
people like to think, no, these things just happen in the United States.
But if we look at essentially how the world has operated so much,
it's like there is racism, anti blackness in particular across the globe,
no matter where you go.
And so it's something that really seems to translates to other nations.
And it's something that especially Putin knows that America can get down with.
And so, seeing all of these pundits really seemed to play into stoke that it just,
it continues to capitalize on the fact that racism is an international currency.
And that is something that Putin is using and that, hey,
American Right Wingers are really closing up to including Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk who had to get his take on the invasion.
>> I'm watching video after video of Ukrainian citizens get in line and
try to figure out what a firearm is.
I'm actually here at big daddy unlimited guns here in Gainesville Florida,
a great second amendment supply company.
And as you watch these [LAUGH] Ukrainian citizens,
I'm laughing because they really have no idea how to handle a firearm.
It really makes you appreciate the wisdom of the founding fathers.
And to take a step backwards and to say,
wait a second if Ukraine had a robust second amendment would Putin invade?
This is a very legitimate question.
I'm not, saying this tongue in cheek would Putin have invaded Ukraine if Ukraine
had widespread gun ownership and a skilled citizenry that knew how to use those guns.
>> Jane, do you think that Charlie's got a point here?
[LAUGH] Okay, there's such clowns, it's unbelievable.
And I noticed that both Charlie Kirk and
Tucker Carlson both said a very legitimate question.
Really, you think it's a legitimate question whether guns could stop cruise
missiles.
So in that what is now almost instantly famous video that we showed
you earlier in the show where a Russian warship pulls up to snake island.
They tell the Ukrainian 13 Ukrainian soldiers on there to surrender.
And the soldiers answer back Russian
warship, go for yourself.
The idea and unfortunately what wound up happening there is they launched
a missile and all 13 died.
They were incredibly brave to stand up to the Russians no matter what.
And they all had weapons.
They were in the army.
You can't stop a missile with a gun.
I mean they remind me of the character and don't look up the Right Wing character was
shooting up at the meteor as it was landing on earth.
You can't stop a meteor or a missile with a gun.
And, they genuinely believe insane, nonsensical things like that.
I think they genuinely believe it.
Or maybe he's doing it to hawk his sponsor there.
And the Tuckers good questions was, he's like did Putin never
asked me to eat dogs or did he ever eat a dog or something?
And he's like, these are good questions.
Are they?
Why is that a good question?
That's a really weird random question right.
Did Putin ever racially discriminate against you?
Wait, why would Putin racially discriminate against me here in America.
Why is that a good question?
It's not a good question.
You're weirdly trying to make it about race.
And then when I point out that you're trying to make it about race, you're like,
how dare you make it about race?
No, I didn't bring up the dogs.
I didn't bring up racial discrimination regarding Putin, etc.
You brought up all those racial things for no reason at all.
And they're constantly trying to make their own political points
in ways that have no logical connection at all including, hey look man.
The Second Amendment that's probably why Putin didn't invade America.
Now he didn't say that, but it was almost implied because we're so strong.
We also have the world's largest nuclear arsenal and we're not on their border.
Those are some small factors that apparently Charlie Kirk forgot.
>> Obviously pistols and assault rifles can't stop missiles,
nuclear weapons, helicopters, well trained military.
But also more importantly how much it would cost to arm
every Ukrainian citizen with that level of military weaponry.
And then to teach them how to use it and be ready for it.
So just from top to bottom, it's ridiculous.
And yes, if the Ukrainian citizens had weapons Russia would still invade.
>> And that's also, I will say on this last point, the fact is that if
Ukrainians had as many guns and weapons as we did in the United States.
They're gonna have a bunch of school shootings,
they're gonna have a lot of femicide.
They're gonna have a lot of things that are completely preventable and
absolutely unnecessary.
And so you have to ask yourself,
do I wanna essentially put my nation in this problematic realm for
the sake of possibly theoretically being able to counter an occasional
once a century attack from this weird theoretical leader.
Vladimir Putin or do I want people to be alive?
So it just seems nonsensical on top of it, I agree.
>> Yeah, the last point is just to back up what Jackson was saying.
I mean you mentioned Trump and a clown and a buffoon,
imagine if he was still president?
>> He will be cheering this on.
>> He might literally be cheering it on.
Remember the first impeachment was about how Trump stopped weapons
sales to Ukraine until he got what he wanted out of them.
He didn't care about their safety at all.
And he's among the people talking about what's Ukraine to us?
What do I care?
So that's the worst case scenario with Trump you almost always got the worst case
scenario, anybody just let the Russians walk in and
take it without organizing anything back.
But even if you didn't hit that worst case scenario.
Do you think he would have done the preparation necessary
to get all of our European allies together in an effective way sanctioned Russia so
that their markets are hurt.
So the oligarchs are hurt and
then put pressure on Putin to back away from the war.
He wouldn't have done any of that because he was the laziest,
most incompetent person that's ever been in office.
So the one good news out of all of this is,
thank God Trump isn't president during an actual international emergency like this.