LOU: SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYOR DOES NOT LIKE-THAT THE
WITH COURT VOTED, ON SHE ASK
CRITICIZED HER REPUBLICAN
COLLEAGUES FOR SIDING WITH THE
ADMINISTRATION.
ADMINISTRATION. FIRST OF ALL, JUSTICE ROBERTS,
NO CLINTON JUDGES, NO IMAWM
JUDGES, NO TRUMP JUDGES.
IT’S PRETTY CLEAR SHE IS
DECIDEDLY ON THE LEFT.
>> IT’S A TYPICAL LEFTIST
APPROACH, IF YOU DISAGREE WITH
THEM YOU HAVE TO HAVE AN
IMPROPER MOTIVE.
IMPROPER MOTIVE. IN OUR JUDICIARY TODAY YOU HAVE
JUDGES PUT POLITICS BEFORE THE
RULE OF LAW AND LET THEIR
ANTI-TRUMP ANIMUS GET IN THE WAY
TO THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO
JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING.
YOU HAVE LOCAL COURTS TRYING TO
RUN OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM AND
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR WOULD SUPPORT
THAT.
THAT. SO THE IDEA SHE IS COMPLAINING
ABOUT POLITICS IS JUST RICH.
LOU: JUDGE AMY BERMAN JACKSON,
SPEAKING OF ANIMUS AND
PARTISANSHIP, SHE IS OVER THE
MOON HERE AGAINST PRESIDENT
TRUMP AND ROGER STONE.
WHY WOULD THERE BE ANY DOUBT
WHATSOEVER THAT HE COULD HAVE A
NEW TRIAL?
NEW TRIAL? TO ME THIS IS SUCH AN OBVIOUS
CASE OF PREJUDICE, I CAN’T
MANAGE WHY IT WOULDN’T BE
IMMEDIATELY SUCCESSFUL ON
APPEAL.
APPEAL. >> WE’LL SEE HOW SHE RULES.
I DIDN’T LIKE HER STATEMENTS IN
THE SENTENCING OF ROGER STONE
CITING EVIDENCE OF CRIMINALITY
ON THE PART OF THE PRESIDENT.
SHE HAS TO LOOK AT THE BOX,
WHAT’S IN THE BOX SHE HAS BEFORE
HER.
HER. MY CONCERN IS THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT HASN’T TAKEN ANY
STRONG ACTION ON THIS ISSUE OF
THE JUROR WHO MAY HAVE LIED
ABOUT HER POLITICS OR
INVOLVEMENT OR ACTIVITIES
REGARDING ROGER STONE.
YOU HAVE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
PUSHING FOR THE STONE
PROSECUTION.
PROSECUTION. CALLING IT I RIGHTEOUS
PROSECUTION.
PROSECUTION. HAVING 6 OR 7 DIFFERENT
POSITIONS.
POSITIONS. JUDGES ARE GOING TO DO WHAT THEY
ARE GOING TO DO.
BUT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT,
THAT’S THE ACCOUNTABLE BRANCH
MOST DIRECTLY.
MOST DIRECTLY. AND THEY ARE PUSHING HARD ON
THIS ABUSE OF STONE AND THAT
NEEDS TO BE THE FOCUS RATHER
THAN THE JUDGE AT THIS POINT.
LOU: LET’S TALK ABOUT THE OBAMA
DEEP STAIPTD COVERING FOR
HILLARY CLINTON.
HILLARY CLINTON. TELL US ABOUT THE JUDICIAL
WATCH’S DISCOVERY OF EMAILS THAT
HILLARY CLINTON APOLOGIZED TO
THEM FOR HER PRIVATE SERVER.
>> THESE ARE DOCUMENTS FROM THE
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND FBI.
THE STRZOK EMAIL IS RESPONDING
TO CONCERNS OUT OF CONGRESS
ABOUT THE WAY THEY HANDLED THE
HILLARY CLINTON INTERVIEW.
STRZOK SAYS SHE APOLOGIZED AND
SAID SHE DID IT OUT OF
CONVENIENCE.
CONVENIENCE. BUT THAT WASN’T PUT INTO THE
FBI’S 302.
FBI’S 302. SO WE HAVE CONFIRMATION THAT THE
302 IS INCOMPLETE.
ANOTHER REASON FOR THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT TO REOPEN IT.
AND TO THIS DAY THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT IS STILL DEFENDING
HILLARY CLINTON.
HILLARY CLINTON. LOU: TOM FITTON MEANS LITERALLY
IN COURT DEFENDING HILLARY