when john for sarnia of was first caught
there was question as to whether it's in him and it won his or not
well it turns out he didn't in the beginning he uh... was put on the what
it's called a public safety exception
and uh...
at that point
actually skip ahead to
what that means because it's actually from a decision in nineteen eighty four
and new york versus quarrels
and so
what happened in that case is that we had a rapist
uh... who
uh... the cops and caught in the victim was there and said
he's got a gun but perhaps confuse gun here of course that was empty
when backed and so they said where's your god before they read it his miranda
rights to went out with the supreme court the supreme court said look
if there's an immediate imminent threat you don't know riz khan is yet you can
ask for the goddess
that that doesn't affect his rights that all right
and after you finding on the need to read in the miranda warnings
now that was in the beginning now of course in the court of cold war on
terror
it gets stretched thin stretched no
people who stress it actually in this case
was not the bush administration it was a wildly mysteries and i say that is if
you should be surprised but
given their horrible record on civil liberties that is actually not
surprising
that it turns out that department us as one of my motive f_b_i_ back in twenty
ten
the first part of it
make sense they say
ages should ask any and all questions that are reasonably prompted
by an immediate concern for the safety of the public
or the resting agents with that would fall under the public safety exception
but never really well enough alone so they also tell that be alright
maybe exceptional cases in which although all relevant public safety
questions
have been asked agents nonetheless
include the continued on warned interrogation
is necessarily collect valuable and timely intelligence
not related to any immediate threat
and that the government interest in obtaining this intelligence
outweighs the disadvantages
of proceeding
with on warren interrogation
in other words
have added costs
we just heard this public safety is actually
edges blew up and said just keep asking questions
moreno warnings is right-wing terrace
that it is no need for that extra step by though by ministration went that way
hyping chinaren demand rights right away
why
i won't lose any evidence
what we've seen as a million times you're eating right away said and matter
when i was younger i thought it would make a big difference but we've seen
that it actually doesn't matter they tell you all information anyway
if you're getting its information out you get a no matter what one is a reader
i don't wanna lose any of that evidence my god can you imagine the
tells the critical thing is that what you did it
and here's how i did it before you got the minority views are important as them
it's so stupid if you ask me
but they use the public safety exception all way too money morning
on the shock are
and then this morning finally they had uh... federal magistrate go in there
and uh... and arraign him and he has gotten the miranda warnings now and he
will go stoop to civilian
process now of course
that's weather problems get really angry
ampere king sasaki et people backing
now the blood was senator feinstein is on the show with him make some decent
points
let's watch the two of them
i want to children so we can save american lives and i think i can only be
done i believe affect the rate
if industry does and we come back i was out of access to all right
dabble evident
fingerprints i understand direct testimony from one of the people that
had his legs blown off that he recognized him he they admitted to the
driver of the car that they hijacked that they were the bombers
so i think there's going to be a great deal of evidence put together to be able
to convict him
and it should likely be a death-penalty case under federal law i'd believe that
the federal competence in doing this at this time is extraordinary
now which ways of our ministry if you go walk i bought the land
after of peter taylor republicans
tell you that your login and then come back
well if your papers are in a couple of years ago now let's use it
he will not be treated as an enemy combatant
we will prosecute this terrorist through our civilian system of justice under
u_s_ law
united states citizens cannot be tried nitride rather in military commissions
i have a lawyer that that is the correct answer
at the classical violinist say illicit
i mean give miranda warnings right away and the public safety exception for like
a weekend
and then the circus owners of the two irreverent
and that liberals you know the jury with me tonight reamers an enemy combatant
putting them in a services
look if you thought there was a bomb are gone somewhere do the public safety
exception
for as long as it takes place
i don't know ten minutes an hour
however long it takes in some
whether there are any other weapons around or any other bombs and said
and then given the miranda warnings that's correct wrote now bomb of course
splits the baby to some degree
that he is a really interesting for
washington post poll
showed the government
immaculate meaning you the question 'cause that the specifics of the
question of very important
it's fat guarding against terrorism versus the constitution and and
uh... protections afforded to espy that quote
which worries you more
that the government will not go far enough invested terrorism because of
concerns about constitutional rights
or that it will go to
for in compromising constitutional rights
inordinate messier terrorism a look at these great answers
will not go far out this forty-one but will go too far we're worried that the
government will go to party or a constitutional rights
in trying to fight terrorism
is forty eight percent of win
arctic return rents
as for far too long unfortunately assumption was american people say no to
take away our constitutional rights that's ok you're fighting terrorism fast
unsafe gary
but finally split forty forty one and here's what's really interesting
republicans on that same question
fifty six to thirty four am not in favor
safety from terrorism but it did when the u_s_ constitution and our rights
that is incredibly encouraging that might be partly because they hale-bopp
i'm gay but i'll take it
anti-democrat some other hand
fourteen forty three-day grainy
but the margin is not as wide there
and forcing their it's like well bottle once they go in some of our rights so i
guess i'm in favor of that and i'm against the constitution i'm
for assisting like personal
so
that's a little discouraging but
hey listen of almost the republic's more than anyone else
so effing for probably has announced a handed down by the constitution and not
just the second amendment
well that's a good sign because he might actually pay attention to that
good signed but
this to be real
the numbers of universities republican president office republicans but almost
by the mar public in presenting tomorrow it's in the regret something a little
more at that
i didn't vote for taking or it's not going to problem it's all based in
hosting because that's all we think about billing from their citizens to
correct ok so it's hard to argue with but at the same time jackpot the only
point i would make
ice time sensing partly through the polls
brother through other articles i've read
certain movement towards see women in the constitution maps
now it's inching that way you write it's mainly team all you can see that in the
republican democratic polling numbers
uh... but in also
democrats a little bit more likely to lead to his rights verses
you know fear-mongering
so that's why even under obama's forty forty three saner no we care more about
your constitutional rights
so under obama
because of the republican opposition
were ironically in a slightly better place in terms of public opinion
i'm giving a damn about the constitution
one last thing on this
news so i would even call an enemy combatant
is if you do the national defense authorization act listen to that act
the twenty twelve of national defense or others it's an act
defines enemy combatant as a person
who was a part
of or substantial supported docket of the fell bad
or so to say that forces better engaged in hostilities against the united states
or its coalition partners
the reality is
how do you know disguise connected to allocator calvin we have no evidence of
that whatsoever
so just the senate and other divas checks being come on
and it came from tristan at some point
that's not good enough to say that step we have to tell that are associated
forces
it is an enemy combatant who are we combating
who are we at war with
do we go on track and we were on russia
where taiwan had gone back to you
we're all our case in a moscow
due to our darkest time curve this time
makes no sense
but this guy kitty
was an american citizen and it makes it a little scary that he was
but he was asian triumph as an american
and then
bring the full weight of the law
dalma