welcome to it's the crime i'm linda and today i'm going to be giving you an update in the
lori vallo day bell case i'm going to give you the response from rob wood in response to mark means
motion to disqualify the prosecuting attorney plus i have a little bit of info snacks for you as well
but before i get into it if you'd like to be part of the it's a crime community
please click that subscribe button below hit that notification bell make sure you
do it to all so that you can be notified of all my videos and my next upcoming live streams
please give this video a like and please share this out where you can now let's get into it
hey john and mark pick a straw any straw there were three documents filed yesterday and i did
read over these documents and looks like there's some shady things going on from the defense
yesterday i did a video on the motion that mark means initiated and filed and as i was editing i
noticed there was a replacement document that was actually from john pryor not mark means but it was
very very similar now before i get into that i need to give you a little info snack john pryor
and mark means share an office here's where john's office is and here's where mark's office is
and when you actually go to mark means website i found it a little comical of what his tagline
reads don't get thrown under the bus now you know where we've heard that from before we actually
heard alex cox telling that to melanie gibb he says i can't believe she threw you meaning laurie
under the bus like that and boom laurie's lawyer is mark means you can't even make this circus up
so back to john and having a very similar motion like mark means
here's what it plays out in my mind knowing that mark and john share the same office john would
say hey mark can i look at your document let me have a look at that mark says yeah sure john
thanks he says and he looks at it he adds a couple uh alleged misconduct in there because misconduct
was in there but he adds a legend all throughout alleged conduct alleged misconduct one two three
four five and shaves down the ground's emotion a little bit and then he makes sure in true john
kiss up style adds honorable court at the end and it'll save him time and money so he just tosses it
to his legal aid and says yeah that'll do that's what it seems like to me maybe the voices in the
corner told him to do it just like it did in court sorry judge i heard some voices in the
corner and i it distracted me i apologize let me know your thoughts in the comments below oh and
mark means his errors that i read out loud on purpose yesterday that's actually been amended
so he didn't say entitles he actually fixed it to say entities so there's that so let's get into
the document this one is a motion for judicial protective order and rob wood is fighting back and
i don't second guess him at all the state of idaho by and through the madison county prosecutor's
office serving as a special prosecutor in fremont county in the above caption case hereby moves this
court for a judicial protective order prohibiting the parties witnesses potential witnesses victims
victim witness coordinators law enforcement officers and court personnel from one providing
any exhibits referenced in the defendant's motion to disqualify the special prosecutor
or any exhibits any party intends to admit in a hearing on that matter to any reporters
the media or from publishing said exhibits on social media two making any comments regarding
the above caption case on social media including but not limited to facebook instagram twitter etc
side note if you remember mark means did a tweet on melanie gibb with a little gif of rats running
number three providing any correspondence or communications between or among the parties to
the media or publishing said correspondence or communications on social media this motion is
based on the following one this is a high profile case that has received a large amount of media
coverage two the defense has filed a motion to change venue and any comments by any of these
parties to this case only serve to heighten media attention and or three participating in any of the
acts listed above creates more media attention and will create difficulty in picking a jury on this
matter the state requests an expedited hearing on this matter and requests that the court enter
a temporary order granting the relief sought above until such time as a hearing may be had dated the
16th day of december 2020 and this was actually signed by troy evans who is the deputy special
prosecuting attorney for fremont county and also a side note we did hear about john complaining about
the widespread media attention and how he actually wants this move to boise idaho as well but i guess
he didn't stop and think it through that this would bring about a lot of media attention as well
i say this because i'm going to give you the info of what rob wood has to say so let's go to
the affidavit here's the affidavit of rob wood in support of objection to defendant's motion
to disqualify prosecuting attorney and motion to extend time on motion to dismiss i rob wood
being first duly sworn depose and say i'm over the age of 21 years competent to testify and i have
personal knowledge as to the matters stated herein i make this affidavit of my own knowledge i am the
duly elected prosecuting attorney for madison county idaho serving as a special prosecutor in
fremont county in the above caption cases at no time did i coerce unduly influence coach and or
intimidate any witness or instruct a witness how to respond to any questions by law enforcement at
all times during the recordings referenced by the defense in their motion to disqualify prosecuting
attorney and motion to extend time on motion to dismiss summer shiftlet and zulema pastenas
were represented and accompanied by their arizona attorney garrett smith i have never met with mrs
shifflett or ms pestenez outside the company of their attorney the meeting with mrs shifflett took
place on or about october 1st 2020 and the meeting with miss pastenas took place on or about october
2nd 2020. both meetings took place at the chandler arizona police department the meetings i attended
with mr smith mrs shifflett and miss pastenas came about as a result of miss pastenas reaching out to
my office and law enforcement through her attorney mr smith the meetings i attended with mr smith mrs
shifflett and miss pastenas were introductory in nature and not investigative said meetings took
place before investigative meetings with law enforcement i did not sit in on the meetings
with law enforcement at no time did mr smith make any objection to statements made by me and after
the introductory meetings mr smith accompanied his clients to interviews with law enforcement
in which they actively participated of their own free will at no time during or after our meeting
did mr smith raise an objection or concern that i had coerced unduly influenced coached intimidated
or instructed a witness how to respond to any questions not only did mr smith not object to
anything said during the initial meetings with mrs shiflett and miss pastanes mr smith and miss
pastenas then met with law enforcement a second time a few weeks after the meeting i did not
record the meeting with mr smith mrs shifflett and miss pastenes the recordings provided by the
defense were recorded without my knowledge or consent and do not include the entirety
of the conversations among me mr smith mrs shifflett and miss pastenes and as such appear
at some level to be incomplete and or possibly edited i believe that mr smith recorded these
conversations due to the fact that part of the recording with miss pastenas appears to have
taken place outside of miss pastena's presents i do not know if mrs shifflett and miss pastenas
consented to the recordings or to any disclosure to any third parties respectfully submitted the
16th day of december 2020 i will say it is a lot easier to read than john pryor's motion
and also mark means motions even though one copied the other so probably not the best idea john
now the third one that i did read was a motion also backing up basically rob wood and it was
submitted by troy evans he talked about in there the same types of things that the defense recorded
rob would without the knowledge or consent of his and does not include the entirety of
the conversation so he backed up everything in that so no need to read it it's redundant
now this actually just reeks of shady behavior in my opinion i thought that very thing when i
read these accusations against rob wood so this does not surprise me in the least especially what
we've been seeing recently with john pryor and it seems like the rules do not apply to them they
just need to like i said grasp at straws and most of you in the comments said the same thing they're
also in my opinion throwing a hissy fit after that recording came out about lori things are
not looking good for them for lori and for chad dabell so i guess when you are on the defense
and you have to back up those two well what do you have right it's a very very complicated case
and there's a lot of moving parts obviously to this case and there's a lot of things that
are going to come out because time and time again we're seeing the patterns and the behavior of chad
day bell and of lori valo slash laurie vallo day bell whatever she is you just have to ask yourself
why are they doing this why these measures if they weren't worried about the case and thought
it was a shoe in they probably wouldn't do these tactics and fabricating a bunch of bs i actually
was a little surprised that john pryor wouldn't do his due diligence and find out exactly about this
recording rather than just borrow from the family attorney mark means and run with it but i doubt
this behavior will stop we're seeing a pattern and we're going to continue seeing a pattern
this circus is only going to get bigger especially with john pryor let me know what your thoughts are
below let's have a chit chat stay tuned for more court documents they're coming please subscribe if
you haven't done so already please like and please share thank you so much for watching see you soon