♪
♪ >>> WITH US NOW, LET’S BRING IN
A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY
COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN SENATOR
MIKE LEE OF UTAH
AUTHOR OF THE NEW BOOK "OUR LOST
DECLARATION," AMERICA’S FIGHT
AGAINST TYRANNY FROM KING GEORGE
TO THE DEEP STATE.
SENATOR, ALWAYS GREAT TO TALK TO
YOU.
YOU. THANK YOU FOR BEING WITH US.
>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.
>> SO LET’S TALK, FIRST OF ALL,
ABOUT NEWS OF THE DAY.
ACTUALLY, AS IT RELATES TO YOUR
BOOK, OBVIOUSLY, YOU AND I HAVE
BOTH BEEN, FOR GOOD REASONS,
BECAUSE WE SERVED IN THE
CONGRESSIONAL -- THE LEGISLATIVE
BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, BUT WE’RE
BOTH ARTICLE ONE GUYS AND HAVE
BEEN CONCERNED ABOUT THE
IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY, CONCERNED
ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FLURRY
OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND I’VE
BEEN CONCERNED, AND I BELIEVE
YOU, TOO, WERE CONCERNED ABOUT
THE PRESIDENT DECLARING
EMERGENCY POWERS
EMERGENCY POWERS NOW, WE HEAR AS OBAMA AND BUSH
AND OTHER PRESIDENTS HAVE DONE
IN THE PAST, WE HEAR THIS
MORNING THAT THE PRESIDENT’S NOT
GOING TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENAS
HOW DO WE BALANCE OUT THE POWER
OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AND
THE POWER OF THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH, WHICH HAS JUST BEEN
GROWING AND GROWING AND GROWING
OVER THE PAST 40 OR 50 YEARS
>> YEAH.
>> YEAH. THAT’S A GOOD POINT.
I WOULD SAY IT IS NOT ONLY THE
LAST 40 OR 50 YEARS, I WOULD SAY
IT’S MORE BEEN OVER THE LAST 70
OR 80 YEARS, WHEN THE POWER OF
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS GROWN
THE INTEREST THING ISING THING I
THINK THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH IS
ALMOST ENTIRELY TO BLAME
IT’S ONE OF THE POINTS I MAKE IN
MY BOOK, ONE OF THE REASONS I
WROTE "OUR LOST DECLARATION.
I BELIEVE THE LEGISLATIVE
BRANCH, IN ORDER TO MAKE IT
EASIER FOR INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS TO AVOID CRITICISM, HAS
SYSTEMATICALLY OUTSOURCED ITS
AUTHORITY.
AUTHORITY. THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY ACT IS A
GREAT EXAMPLE OF THAT.
DECADES AGO, WE GAVE THIS VAST
POWER TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH,
THEN WE CRY ABOUT IT WHEN IT
GETS USED.
GETS USED. THE FACT IS, THAT IS, IN FACT,
THE LEGISLATIVE POWER, AND IT IS
EXERCISED WITHIN THE EXERCISE
BRAN
BRAN EXECUTIVE BRANCH BECAUSE WE
ALLOWED IT TO DO SO.
IT IS WRONG.
>> LET’S TALK ABOUT THE NEWS OF
THE DAY, WHICH IS, OF COURSE,
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES TELLING BOB COSTA OF THE
"WASHINGTON POST" THAT HE IS
GOING TO IGNORE SUBPOENAS FROM
THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
REPUBLICANS WOULD SAY, WELL,
BARACK OBAMA AND ERIC HOLDER DID
THAT STARTING IN 2011 ON FAST
AND FURIOUS.
AND FURIOUS. HOW IN THE WORLD DO YOU HAVE
EITHER A REPUBLICAN OR A
DEMOCRATIC OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
EVER HAVING THE POWER TO
ADEQUATELY OVERSEE AN
ADMINISTRATION IF IT IS THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO DECIDES
WHETHER THOSE CONTEMPT ORDERS
CAN BE ENFORCED OR NOT
>> THIS IS ONE OF THE
PREROGATIVES OF THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH
BRANCH YOU’RE RIGHT, THIS HAS BEEN
LITIGATED FIGURATIVELY AND
LITERALLY OVER THE COURSE OF
MANY DECADES, WITH REPUBLICAN
AND DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATIONS,
AGAINST REPUBLICAN AND
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSES.
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSES. ONLY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS A
PROSECUTORIAL POWER, AND AS PART
OF THAT, TOUGH HAVE AN ATTORNEY
GENERAL OR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
WILLING TO BRING AN ACTION TO
SUPPORT A SUBPOENA
>> BUT, SENATOR, THEY NEVER WILL
THOUGH
THOUGH >> RIGHT
>> RIGHT TYPICALLY, THEY DON’T.
>> JUST LIKE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BARR IS NO MORE LIKELY TO FIND
DONALD TRUMP IN CONTEMPT OF
CONGRESS THAN ERIC HOLDER WOULD
HAVE FOUND BARACK OBAMA IN CON
CEMENT OF
CEMENT OF TEMPT OF CONGRESS.
SHOULD WE SELECT ATTORNEY
GENERALS LIKE FBI DIRECTORS,
SOMEBODY THAT MAYBE SERVES FOR
TEN YEARS?
TEN YEARS? >> I DON’T THINK SO.
THE REASON I DON’T THINK SO IS I
TEND TO BELIEVE THAT WE’RE
BETTER OFF WHEN SOMEONE STANDS
IN THAT POSITION, ALONG WITH
MOST -- PERHAPS ALL EXECUTIVE
BRANCH POSITIONS, THOSE PEOPLE
NEED TO STAND ACCOUNTABLE TO THE
PRESIDENT AT ANY MOMENT, WHETHER
IT’S A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT
OR SOMETHING ELSE.
THERE IS VALUE IN HAVING
POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND
HAVING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE UNITED STATES, FOR EXAMPLE,
BE NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT
AND SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE
PRESIDENT.
PRESIDENT. THAT PROVIDES POLITICAL
ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE PRESIDENT.
>> BUT DO YOU THINK THAT’S BEING
PROVIDED RIGHT NOW WITH ATTORNEY
GENERAL BARR
GENERAL BARR >> WELL, I THINK IT IS PROVIDED,
IN THE SENSE THAT WHEN A
PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEY GENERAL
DECIDES TO TAKE OR NOT TAKE A
PARTICULAR ACTION, THAT’S
ANSWERABLE ULTIMATELY TO THE
PRESIDENT.
PRESIDENT. >> AND LET’S TALK ABOUT, DID YOU
AGREE WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL
BARR’S DECISIONS LAST WEEK AS IT
PERTAINED TO THE MUELLER REPORT,
AS IT PERTAINED TO HIM DRAWING
CONCLUSIONS, AND THE WAY THAT HE
RELEASED THE MUELLER REPORT, THE
WAY HE SUMMARIZED THE MUELLER
REPORT, THE WAY THAT MANY PEOPLE
BELIEVED HE WAS ACTING MORE ON
BEHALF OF DONALD TRUMP THAN THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE?
AMERICAN PEOPLE? >> YEAH, DON’T BELIEVE -- I
DON’T AGREE WITH THE LATTER
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION I THINK HE RESPONDED IN A
PROFESSIONAL MANNER.
PROFESSIONAL MANNER. I THINK HE DID HIS JOB
I DON’T THINK HE WAS ACTING
PURSUANT TO POLITICAL PRESSURE
I THINK HE WAS DOING WHAT HE
BELIEVED WAS THE RIGHT THING TO
DO UNDER THE LAW
LOOK, TWO YEARS HAD BEEN SPENT
ON THIS INVESTIGATION.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, THEY
FOUND NO EVIDENCE, NOT EVEN A
SEN
SEN BIT OF EVIDENCE, TO SUPPORT THE
COLLUSION THEORY
COLLUSION THEORY ULTIMATELY, THERE WAS A DECISION
MADE THAT THERE WAS NO REASON,
NO BASIS UPON WHICH TO PROCEED
WITH A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF
THE PRESIDENT.
THE PRESIDENT. I THINK HE PROPERLY CONCLUDED
THE SOLUTION HERE, ANY FURTHER
ACTION TO BE TAKEN ON THIS IS A
POLITICAL DECISION, ONE TO BE
MADE WITHIN CONGRESS
I DON’T QUESTION THAT, AND I
SUPPORT HIM WHOLEHEARTEDLY
>> SENATOR, YOU WRITE IN VOLUME
ONE OF THE MUELLER REPORT, THE
SPECIAL COUNSEL COULD NOT
ESTABLISH A CONSPIRACY BETWEEN
THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THE
RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, BUT IT MADE
VERY CLEAR OVER THE 450 PAGES A
SYSTEMIC RUSSIAN EFFORT TO
INTERFERE IN THE 2016 ELECTION,
ECHOING WHAT OUR INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY SAID BEFORE
THERE WAS A STORY THAT JUST
CROSSED IN "THE NEW YORK TIMES"
THAT KIRSTJEN NIELSEN WANTED TO
APPROACH THE PRESIDENT AND RAISE
HER CONCERN ABOUT CONTINUED
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN OUR
ELECTION PROCESS AND WAS TOLD BY
THE WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF
MICK MULVANEY NOT TO RAISE THAT
WITH THE PRESIDENT
ANY TALK OF THAT WAS SOMEHOW AN
ARGUMENT FOR DE-LEGITIMIZING THE
PRESIDENT’S ELECTION
PRESIDENT’S ELECTION ARE YOU CONCERNED BY THE FACT
THAT THE PRESIDENT’S VIEW OF HIS
ELECTION IN 2016 IS SOMEHOW
SUPPRESSING THE AWARENESS AND
THE REACTION TO THE THREAT OF
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN OUR
ELECTIONS?
ELECTIONS? >> I HAVEN’T READ THAT STORY
YET, SO I CAN’T SAY THIS WITH
CONFIDENCE, BUT IT DOESN’T SOUND
TO ME THAT’S NECESSARILY WHAT
THAT WAS SAYING.
IT SOUNDS LIKE A DECISION WAS
MADE BY THE WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF
STAFF ABOUT WHAT SHOULD AND
SHOULDN’T BE BROUGHT DIRECTLY TO
THE PRESIDENT, RATHER THAN
THROUGH THE CHIEF OF STAFF.
>> DO YOU THINK THE PRESIDENT
SHOWS ENOUGH CONCERN, EVEN
PRIVATELY WHEN YOU TALK TO HIM
ABOUT THE RUSSIAN THREAT
WE SAID YOU CAN SAY IT ONCE IF
YOU’RE THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES, YES, THERE’S
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE I ACCEPT THAT.
WE HAVE TO DO MORE ABOUT IT.
NO, I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
WHY CAN’T HE SAY THE FIRST PART
OF THAT STATEMENT?
>> WELL, I DON’T THINK HE
DISPUTES THE FACT THAT IT
HAPPENED
HAPPENED I DON’T THINK STATEMENT?
>> I DON’T THINK HE DISPUTES THE
FACT THAT IT HAPPENED, I DON’T
THINK ANY OF US DENY THAT THERE
WAS RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE
MY NOW COLLEAGUE MITT ROMNEY,
THEN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE,
WARNED ABOUT RUSSIA.
I WISH THOSE WARNINGS HADN’T
GONE UNHEEDED BY PRESIDENT
OBAMA.
OBAMA. THAT THE EARLY WARNINGS DETECTED
BY PRESIDENT OBAMA IN THE 2016
ELECTION CYCLE, I WISH THAT HAD
RESULTED IN MORE ACTION ON THEIR
PART TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS --
>> BUT YOU SAW LAST SUMMER,
SENATOR, THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES STANDING ON A
STAGE IN HELSINKI WITH PRESIDENT
VLADIMIR PUTIN SAYING I DON’T
KNOW WHY HE WOULD DO IT.
POURING COLD WATER ON THE IDEA
SO DO YOU THINK HE IS CONCERNED
ENOUGH ABOUT RUSSIAN
INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTION
PROCESS?
PROCESS? >> I THINK HE IS CONCERNED
THIS ISN’T SOMETHING WE CAN
TOLERATE
TOLERATE IT’S IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF
COLLUSION AND THERE’S NO
EVIDENCE OF EFFORTS BY THE
RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT HAD ANY
IMPACT ON THE ULTIMATE OUTCOME
OF THIS ELECTION.
>> SENATOR, BERNIE SANDERS WAS
ON TALKING ABOUT RUSSIAN
INTERFERENCE AND THERE’S NO
DOUBT THAT THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN
USED INFORMATION THAT THE
RUSSIANS LEAKED.
RUSSIANS LEAKED. HE SAID THAT WAS A-OKAY.
IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU?
>> I DON’T EVER INTEND TO BE A
CAMPAIGN MANAGER
CAMPAIGN MANAGER IT’S DIFFICULT FOR ME TO SAY
WHETHER FOR SURE THEY WOULD DO
THAT.
THAT. >> WOULD YOU USE IT IN A SENATE
CAMPAIGN
CAMPAIGN >> I DON’T THINK SO.
IF SOMEBODY CAME TO ME UNDER
THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES I THINK I
WOULD BE INCLINED TO REPORT THEM
TO THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT
AUTHORITIES AND DEAL WITH THEM
AT ARM’S LENGTH AT BEST THROUGH
OUR OWN GOVERNMENT
BUT AS I SAID, NEVER HAVE BEEN
IN THAT POSITION AND HOPE NEVER
TO BE.
TO BE. >> I WANTED TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE
REPORT AND THE PART THAT’S NOW
MORE OF A LIVE ISSUE AND
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
I KNOW YOU’VE SAID AS TO
OBSTRUCTION, A QUOTE OF YOURS
HERE, THEY WERE UNABLE, MEANING
MUELLER’S INVESTIGATORS, WERE
UNABLE TO COME UP WITH A CASE
AGAINST THE PRESIDENT THAT WOULD
SURVIVE IN COURT
YOU POINT OUT THIS IS NOT A
LEGAL ISSUE.
LEGAL ISSUE. THE QUESTION IS A POLITICAL ONE.
THE REPORT HAS TEN INSTANCES
THAT, FOR MANY PEOPLE, THEY READ
THEM AND SAY I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THE LEGAL STANDARD IS HERE BUT
THAT LOOKS LIKE OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE TO ME, INCLUDING THE
PRESIDENT, ASKING THE COUNSEL TO
FIRE BOB MUELLER, ASKING HIM TO
LIE ABOUT, NOTES TO FILE THAT HE
SUGGEST THAT HE DID NOT ASK BOB
MUELLER TO FIRE HIM.
THOSE THINGS, TO A COMMON SENSE
VOTER, LOOK AN AWFUL LOT LIKE
YOU’RE TRYING TO OBSTRUCT
SOMETHING.
SOMETHING. HOW IS IT THAT YOU DON’T THINK
IF THOSE THINGS ARE NOT MEETING
THE STANDARD, ARE NOT TROUBLING
AND THAT THE PRESIDENT IS
INAPPROPRIATELY ABUSING HIS
POWER.
POWER. >> FIRST OF ALL, WE ARE TALKING
ABOUT THINGS THAT WERE NEVER
CARRIED THROUGH ALL THE WAY.
SECONDLY, THIS IS A POLITICAL
QUESTION AND NOT ONE THAT CAN BE
BROUGHT FORWARD IN COURT AND,
THEREFORE, BY ITS VERY NATURE.
IT’S UP TO THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES TO DECIDE
WHETHER IT WANTS TO DO ANYTHING
ABOUT THIS
ABOUT THIS NUMBER THREE, IT’S IMPORTANT TO
REMEMBER THAT IT TENDS TO BE A
POLITICAL MISTAKE FOR THE PARTY
TO GO AFTER THE OCCUPANT OF THE
WHITE HOUSE ESPECIALLY WITHIN A
YEAR AND A HALF OF A
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN.
>> CAN I INTERRUPT AND ASK YOU
THIS QUESTION?
THIS QUESTION? I’VE BEEN TRYING TO ASK YOU --
NOT A POLITICAL ANALYSIS BUT ASK
YOU THIS QUESTION.
SITTING PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY,
WENT TO HIS COUNSEL AND TRIED TO
ORDER THAT THE MAN WHO WAS
INVESTIGATING HIM BE FIRED
THAT COUNSEL STOOD UP AND SAID
I’M NOT GOING TO DO THAT
THE PRESIDENT THEN ASKED HIM TO
LIE ABOUT IT, BOTH PUBLICLY AND
THEN LIE ABOUT IT IN DOCUMENTS
HE WOULD PUT IN THE FILES.
DOES THAT NOT STRIKE YOU
PERSONALLY AS OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE OR AT LEAST AS SOMETHING
THAT IS EXTRAORDINARILY
TROUBLING?
TROUBLING? >> IT CERTAINLY STRIKES ME AS
SOMETHING THAT’S UNFLATTERING.
YOU CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION
LIKE THIS OVER THE COURSE OF TWO
YEARS, YOU’RE GOING TO FIND SOME
THINGS THAT ARE UNFLATTERING
THIS IS UNFLATTERING
I DON’T THINK ANYONE DISPUTES
THAT.
THAT. >> SO, SENATOR, THANK YOU FOR
COMING AND ANSWERING OUR
QUESTIONS.
QUESTIONS. LET’S TALK ABOUT YOUR BOOK
"OUR LOST DECLARATION.
YOU SAID YOU’VE NEVER RUN FOR
PRESIDENT, NEVER WORKED ON A
PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN.
PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. LET’S JUST SAY, THOUGH -- LET’S
SAY YOU WERE PRESIDENT
TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU WOULD DO TO
HELP ENACT SOME OF THE THINGS
THAT YOU WRITE ABOUT IN "OUR
LOST DECLARATION"?
LOST DECLARATION"? >> I WOULD WORK TIRELESSLY TO
REINVIGORATE ARTICLE I OF OUR
CONSTITUTION, WHICH TIES
DIRECTLY INTO OUR DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE AND WHY I WROTE
"OUR LOST DECLARATION.
OVER THE LAST 80 YEARS WE’VE
SEEN A PROFOUND SHIFT OF POWER
FROM THE PEOPLE’S ELECTED
LAWMAKERS IN WASHINGTON OVER TO
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
ONE OF THE THINGS WE PUSHED BACK
AGAINST AT THE TIME OF THE
AMERICAN REVOLUTION.
AMERICAN REVOLUTION. ONE OF THE REASONS WE NO LONGER
FLY THE UNION JACK OR SING "GOD
SAVE THE QUEEN" HAS NOT TO DO
WITH JUST GETTING RID OF A
MONARCHY BUT THE INHERENT
DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN MORTAL
SOUL
SOUL GOVERNMENT IS NOT THERE TO SERVE
THE PEOPLE BUT THE OTHER WAY
AROUND, I REINVIGORATE THAT THE
LAWS ARE TO BE MADE BY CONGRESS,
THAT THE MOST DANGEROUS BRANCH
OF GOVERNMENT IS CONGRESS, MOST
ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE AT
REGULAR INTERVALS.
REGULAR INTERVALS. THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES IS UP FOR EVERY
TWO YEARS AND ONE-THIRD OF THE
SENATE IS UP FOR ELECTION EVERY
TWO YEARS.
TWO YEARS. THAT’S WHY WE SHOULD ONLY
ENTRUST THE MOST DANGEROUS
GOVERNMENT OF POWERS WITH THE
MOST DANGEROUS BRANCH.
>> SO, SENATOR, THERE HAS BEEN,
ACTUALLY, THIS TENSION FROM THE
START, EVEN ANYBODY THAT’S EVER
READ THE FEDERALIST PAPERS
UNDERSTANDS THAT THE BATTLE HAS
BEEN RAGING SINCE HAMILTON AND
MADISON WORKED TOGETHER TO DRAW
THOSE PAPERS
THOSE PAPERS IT SEEMS RIGHT NOW, THOUGH, THAT
HAMILTON IS HAVING HIS DAY, THAT
THE HAMILTON SIDE OF THE
ARGUMENT IS PREVAILING OVER
MADISON’S.
MADISON’S. >> YES, THAT IS RIGHT.
I WOULD TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER
AND SAY IT’S NOT JUST THE
HAMILTON SIDE THAT’S PREVAILING
IN THAT THERE’S BEEN MORE OF A
CONCENTRATION OF POWER AT THE
FEDERAL LEVEL BUT ALSO THAT KING
GEORGE III MODEL IS PREVAILING
I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT JUST THIS
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION IN FACT, I’M TALKING ABOUT
BASICALLY EVERY REPUBLICAN AND
DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATION OVER
THE LAST 80 YEARS UNDER HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, SENATES AND
WHITE HOUSES OF EVERY
CONCEIVABLE PARTISAN COMBINATION
WHO HAVE SYSTEMATICALLY HANDED
OVER THESE VAST POWERS TO THE
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
EXECUTIVE BRANCH WAR POWER, LAW MAKING POWER, THE
REGULATORY SYSTEM, THE
INTELLIGENCE GATHERING
INTELLIGENCE GATHERING APPARATUS, LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCIES AND ALL KINDS OF
AGENCIES THAT ARE TOLD, IN
EFFECT, GO AND MAKE GOOD LAW
THIS IS EXACTLY THE TYPE OF
GOVERNMENT WE FOUGHT BACK
AGAINST AT THE TIME OF
REVOLUTION
REVOLUTION INSTEAD OF HAVING A SINGLE
FIGURE HEAD, KING GEORGE III, AT
THE TIME OF THE REVOLUTION, WE
HAVE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF
EXECUTIVE BRANCH BUREAUCRATS WHO
ARE NAMELESS AND FACELESS AS FAR
AS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GO BUT,
LIKE THE KING, CANNOT BE
REMOVED.
REMOVED. THAT’S TROUBLING
THAT’S TROUBLING IT OUGHT TO CONCERN ALL OF US,
AND IT’S THE FOCUS OF MY BOOK.
>> ALL RIGHT, SENATOR.
AND THAT BOOK IS "OUR LAST
DECLARATION," MARIJUANA
DECLARATION," MARIJUANA AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST TYRANNY,
FROM KING GEORGE TO THE DEEP
STATE.
STATE. IT’S AVAILABLE NOW
SENATOR MIKE LEE, THANKS AGAIN
APPRECIATE YOU BEING WITH US
JARED KUSHNER TRIES TO DISMISS
ELECTION INTERFERENCE AS A
COUPLE OF FACEBOOK ADS
A COUPLE SEEMS, BY MANY, TO BE
QUITE AN UNDERSTAPLE