You know Jimmy Dore has a video called uh mainstream media mainstream media hit piece
on youtube just agreeing how a rare lies radicalizes people which we know it's true
door knows it's true this is the guy that uh interviewed cable kane but that's when
he censored sam's name you know doors in the same company as steven crowder and dave rubin
and uh you know other people that won't mention his name how you know uh dore just uh
backed his idea about uh talking to a bugle of boys you know he just had his dave rubin moment
saying how he just wants to talk about ideas you know and it's not just you know there's
many others that lie about why did he bring up the boogaloo boys again since early january
did he did he say something recently yeah yeah i just saw another video about it where he uh
he's talking about how you know we need to talk to all people instead of not just the leftists the
progressives you know the you know people that are on our side by the socialist we need to talk to
everybody and he also bragged about still going on to tucker carlson because tucker carlson's
anti-war is his line you know the thing here's the thing and they they
the door people usually miscategorize my views on this as well i don't think there's anything
wrong with talking to everybody there's nothing wrong with having on whoever you want on your show
or going on whatever show you want to go on or just you know i have no problem with that at all
the point is what is the purpose of it if the purpose of having a right winger on your show
is to promote their views and let them talk it up as something great without any pushback
then that's wrong in my opinion if your point isn't to promote those views um i mean it's that
simple you could talk to whoever you want but what is the purpose of the conference exactly
right i mean katie helper and antaibi were talking about having rudy giuliani on her show and not to
call him we're trying not to call out rudy or the trump administration administration now for their
our crimes and their incompetence but to actually promote them and it'll be good for him to come on
their show you know so like why have rudy on your show at all if you're you know i mean
listen if they want to have julian and i'm sure it would be i'm sure it would be great for their
show absolutely i don't there's anything really wrong without with uh pointing that out but again
what what are they going to talk with him about when he's on there are they going to completely
try to get something out of him to try to you know hold him to account for the whole nonsense he went
through to put the election under scrutiny on unwarranted scrutiny i mean are they going to
nail him for his unabashed support of trump's big lie or are they going to have him on and talk
up whatever i don't i don't know i'm not going to speculate i don't know if it's happened yet
the first i'm hearing of this particular thing but again my point is have on whoever you want uh
but what is the purpose of the conversation that's that's the real point to me and to your main point
the nuance uh i absolutely i absolutely agree uh in fact last night i one of my tweets made it to
tucker carlson's show apparently i've not seen it people sent me the screenshot and oh really
uh yeah and what i gotta say uh either either tucker's audience really does not care about the
new york city mayoral race or tucker's audience is a lot less engaged because i really didn't get
much response from his uh viewership for this but um uh basically what i saw this is pretty quick
it's not okay go ahead yeah good uh i was just don't say it's just not like people and guests
it's you know news reports and talking points like you know people not talking the full story about
biden's immigration we know it's not great but you know we know it's far better than uh you know
trump by far well you know when it comes to saucy and his emails a lot of people on both
sides you know and i'm mostly calling on the left because that's what i'm a part of not telling the
full story about the emails taking things out of context misrepresenting what people say were man
at the time you know what i mean and you know now you have doors yes man just really like
doris yes man ron pacone attacking tom hartman of all people on twitter but uh you know i mean
right now is someone who looked through those fouchy emails or the vast majority of them and
has written about them um the interesting thing in there is look at getting a behind-the-scenes look
at what uh the head of the response to the kovid pandemic was dealing with and going through and
i don't mean this you know as sympathetically i mean we can see what he went through the mystery
undermined the mistakes he made which there are mistakes he made in in getting information out
to the public we get to see what's interesting to me is how responsive he was to anyone and
everyone who replied who sent him an email but as in terms of there being some sort of big unveil in
there like some big eureka moment in there there is nothing of the sort in fact all the emails
that are passed around as some big bombshells by the right especially and by those on on certain
uh factions on the left all those emails that are considered bombshells exactly are emails that were
sent to fochi from complete nobodies one of the major emails that were being sent around was an
email claiming that um they had the recipe to make covid19 and what it was was some covert conspiracy
theorist who runs a covert conspiracy website where he sells covet merch called covet candy
and the guy basically copied and pasted an old scientific report from i believe it was either
like the late uh 1990s or early 2000s that had absolutely nothing to do with covid19
um i mean it was just it's just ridiculous it's ridiculous there's nothing that people are turning
nothing into something just because they hear that emails were released like that's the thing
people don't understand what they're talking about they assume emails released must be some crazy
information and there must have been some sort of hack which also is not true those were released
due to a freedom of information act request uh i mean it's just ridiculous i mean they've
they yeah after the the freedom of information act they gave out those emails that you know abiding
without you where anybody wanted those still classified they would be okay you know and same
thing with the wuhan uh uh virus leak uh theory that's out there and there's really still no
evidence that it did i mean it's possible but you know but again not to tell both
sides of the story just just annoys me so much especially when you're supposed to be a leftist
uh progress progressive a commentator on a story you know thank you for the call thanks
for taking my call you know i appreciate it take care dave um they released an unofficial tally
of the ranked choice voting results for new york city mayor and what happened was in the the
original unofficial again unofficial these weren't the finalized results there's still even a hundred
twenty something thousand uh absentee ballots yet to be counted but in the original unofficial tally
they accidentally added a hundred and thirty thousand some odd test ballots complete mess up
absolutely uh run uh the uh rake the uh new york city board of elections over the kohl's for this
they deserve scrutiny obviously but mistakes do happen um especially here yeah and uh people when
they heard this they didn't realize that was what happened all they saw was uh and i'm included in
this all they saw was a number of pundits left right and center also saw this and said the
same thing when eric adams proud of his original response he was uh to that it seemed like he was
calling into question the entire election to some people at first because he had already hinted he
was going to do that before election day even he had already hinted that ranked choice voting was
going to possibly cost him the election and that it was and his campaign was calling the actual
legal process in new york city how voting actually works now in new york city ranked choice voting
they were calling it racist because it was going to undermine his voters will which is not the case
ranked choice voting makes it so no one's vote ever gets thrown away depending on who they vote
for you can vote for whoever you want and still rank other people who could have a better shot
and you know if your first choice doesn't make it your real choice doesn't make it because
you know they never really had a shot to begin with maybe your next choice gets your vote too
and then it keeps going down the line until you've exercised all your ranked choice options it's to
me it's the most it's the best possible way to make sure every single vote counts
oh excuse me sorry i was just finishing my lunch i ordered the crowder it was really good
hey don't forget to subscribe and to hit the like button thank you can't do it without you