I will be back after La Vista calculated cyber position.
Sorry, John, I'm afraid I can't do that.
>> What did we tell you?
They're gonna be using AI to attack political candidates in this cycle.
It's not in the future.
It's now.
Take a look at this.
>> Are you wearing lady clothes?
>> What?
>> Are you wearing lady clothes?
Those look like lady pants.
>> No, this is a power suit.
>> That there is a woman's suit.
>> I do not buy women's clothes.
Do not make that mistake again.
>> That obviously is Michael Scott.
That's also obviously not Michael Scott, it's Ron DeSantis.
Now, I saw that the way a lot of people saw that.
Donald Trump Jr.
son to the President, tweeted it out with the caption, DeSantis does seem to spend
a lot of time in high heels which we also told you they would be mocking him over.
But to be clear, they're not just mocking him for being short there.
They're again implying, as they do constantly, that Ron DeSantis is gay.
That's just what they're doing.
That's what this race is about.
But that said, it is fairly advanced AI.
Here's a little bit more of it.
>> Ma'am, would you please tell Darryl that this is not a woman's suit?
>> My God, that's a woman's suit.
>> You're wearing a woman's suit?
>> No, I wear men's suits, okay?
I got this out of a bin.
There were this huge bins of clothes and
everybody was rightfully through them like crazy, and I grabbed one and it fit.
So I don't think that this is totally just a woman's suit.
At the very least, it's bisexual.
>> Who makes it?
>> Miss Terious, it's European, okay?
It's the European cut.
>> The pants don't have any pockets.
>> No, they don't.
See, italians don't wear pockets.
Make one tiny mistake, you're dead.
I made one tiny mistake, I wore woman's clothes.
[MUSIC]
Please clap.
>> You got the meatball in there and everything.
So, look, is this a substantive attack?
No, but it's also exactly what we said was gonna happen.
Not just that they're gonna use the AI like this, but
they are going to make an absolute laughing stock out of Ron DeSantis.
Now, you can still tell, first of all, if you've watched The Office,
you know that that's not actually Ron DeSantis, but the video isn't perfect and
the voice has some issues but it's advancing pretty quickly.
Francesca, what do you think?
>> First of all, great scene.
It's a very funny scene from The Office, but that's all these people are.
You guys, MAGA is a movement that elevates meme lords.
You can meme your way into office.
You can meme your way.
Seriously, if Trump ever gets another crack at the White House,
again, it will be the top five memers.
And Stephen Miller will be like, man, and everyone's just gonna
have to present whatever they created and whatever bad graphic they made.
It's just so sad.
It's so pathetic.
And also, that's Meatwad not meatball, okay?
And do not denigrate.
[CROSSTALK] >> He's the meatball, Ron.
That's what I said, I watched.
[CROSSTALK] >> I know, I'm saying they don't get,
I'm saying do not, Meatwad is a good man.
>> He's the best of them on the [INAUDIBLE].
>> He is the best of them.
>> He is, he is, I love him.
But anyway, yeah, it's fairly effective.
And the thing is, they do it on the office, okay?
Instantly, almost everybody knows that it's not real.
But if you do that to just an interaction of some racist person yelling the N
word or something, is everyone gonna know that that
wasn't a new candidate that you're not that familiar with or whatever?
We're rolling all these out so that you can see the technology as it advances, but
also start to get an idea of how this could be even more insidious,
even more damaging.
And when Donald Trump Jr.
tweets it out, you can be pretty sure that it's fake or whatever.
But also, from the point of view of Ron DeSantis, does it matter that it's fake?
And I get what you're saying.
People photoshop just a still JPEG as a meme and that can insult you.
I just do think that there is something more effective about fake video and
fake audio.
This stuff is gonna become pervasive.
And the reason I wanted to bring it up with you, Francesca, just really briefly
before we move on is, I had a conversation with my wife yesterday.
Obviously, for people who are watching don't know,
my wife is expecting our first child.
And I said to her, cuz we were talking about AI and I was like,
our children are going to grow up thinking that it's the most normal thing ever.
They will never have lived in a world where everyone doesn't have routine access
to AI, text, audio, and video generation.
And probably a million times more integrated and
advanced than we have right now.
They will think that that is the most normal technology ever.
And they will always have lived in a world where people can make their own movies and
their own songs and everything.
>> Unless we don't tell them about the internet.
>> Yeah, that'll work.
>> It doesn't exist.
Look, my daughter hasn't watched TV yet.
She sees computers and goes, [SOUND], but she's never watched, okay,
she watched the Rihanna halftime show, that was it.
But that could have been a dream.
First thing she ever watched.
Loved it, very much loved it.
But that could have been a dream.
What are you talking about?
There's no moving images.
No, I think here's the thing, John.
You and I are very different, and
I think a lot of people feel fatalistic about technology.
I'm not.
And I think generally, we need to approach technology not as an inevitability, but as
something that we can potentially regulate and control in order to help and assist.
And not sort of grant it full access to the free market to screw over
our lives forever and ever.
But that's just me.
>> I like it.
I like that approach.
I hope that we move in that direction.
I think it's gonna really depend on who's making all the money off of this.
And I'm assuming it's the rich in which case they'll be protected,
would be my fear.
[MUSIC]