WE’D LIKE TO INVITE HIM AND HIS
ATTORNEY TO COME ON THIS PROGRAM
PROGRAM.
HERE WITH REACTION, THIS IS THE
BOOK.
IT’S ON Amazon.com,
Hannity.com, BOOKSTORES
EVERYWHERE.
IT IS CALLED "REX --
--
RESURRECTED JAY ESUS."
AND HIS DAUGHTER, WHO IS MY
PERSONAL ASSISTANT, WORKS HERE
ON "HANNITY" AND FOX NEWS.
THEY RODE IT TOGETHER.
THE BOOK IS AWESOME, I’M PROUD
OF YOU, I HOPE EVERYONE GETS A
COPY.
IT’S A GREAT BOOK.
I’VE -- CAN’T THANK YOU ENOUGH
AT THAT.
ALSO WITH US IS TRUMP ATTORNEY
AND FOX LEGAL ANALYST.
START WITH YOU, LET’S START WITH
THIS JUDGE’S DECISION AND WHAT
IT MEANS.
THEY GOT HIS TAX RECORDS,
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
INFORMATION, HIS PASSPORTS.
WHAT DIDN’T THEY GET?
>> THEY TOOK EVERYTHING THEY
WANTED TO TAKE.
THE INJUNCTION, WHICH MEANS THAT
THEY HAVE STOPPED ALL CRIMINAL
STATIONS, WHICH -- WAS GRANTED
FOR THE TRUMP TEAM.
ADDITIONALLY, WE RECEIVED
APPROVAL TO GET A SPECIAL
MASTER, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT
THEY HAD HOPED WOULD HAPPEN.
THE DOJ, AS YOU MAY RECALL, WAS
OPPOSING THIS.
THEY DIDN’T WANT IT.
WITH THE PUBLIC HAD ASSUMED WAS
A DELAY WAS THE JUDGE MENTIONED
THIS -- THE FACT THAT DOJ WAS NOT WILLING TO GRANT
THAT TO THE PRESIDENT PRIOR.
-- UNTIL THAT SPECIAL MASTER
GETS THERE.
>> FROM DAY ONE, I SAID THAT
THIS WAS A FISHING POSITION,
TAKING A FORMER PRESIDENT’S TAX
INFORMATION, HIS ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE INFORMATION, OVER 500
PAGES AT LEAST, WE ARE READING
NOW.
TAKING HIS MEDICAL RECORDS,
PASSPORTS.
THIS IS WHY THAT BROAD WARRANT,
THAT YOU SHOULD SEE, THE
AFFIDAVIT IN FULL, NOT
REDACTED -- THIS IS WHY IT WAS
OFFICIALLY EXPEDITION.
THERE ARE CERTAIN SECTIONS THAT
USED IN THE ESPIONAGE ACT.
>> I AGREE.
IT WAS PROTECTION ALL.
I LOOK FORWARD TO READING THEIR
BOOK.
THEY ARE GIFTED WRITERS.
THE JUDGE SEEMED TO BE SAYING
THAT MERRICK GARLAND WENT TOO
FAR, GRABBED TOO MUCH AND GABBED
TOO MUCH.
IN THE EARS OF THE MEDIA THAT
HATE DONALD TRUMP, DEROGATORY
INFORMATION ABOUT THE DOCUMENTS
THAT MERRICK GARLAND SEEKS TO
CONCEAL.
THE JUDGE TALKED ABOUT THE
IRREPARABLE INJURY, THE
POTENTIAL HARM THAT THE
PRESIDENT SUFFERS AS A
CONSEQUENCE -- THE EFFORT TO
CONVICT HIM IN THE COURT OF
PUBLIC OPINION.
THE JUDGE ALSO SEEMED SKEPTICAL
ABOUT THE SHEER EXPANSE OF WHAT THE FBI WENT IN AND DID IN
THE FBI WENT IN AND DID IN
MAR-A-LAGO.
11,000 DOCUMENTS, 1800 MORE
OTHER ITEMS DESCRIBED BY THE
JUDGE.
NOT TO MENTION, 520 DOCUMENTS
THAT ARE CONFIDENTIALLY COVERED
BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
THAT DOESN’T EVEN INCLUDE
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.
THIS WAS THE BIG BLOW TO
MERRICK GARLAND.
A JUDGE DEFLATED HIS ARGUMENT
THAT JOE BIDEN HAS THE AUTHORITY
TO NULLIFY A FORMER PRESIDENT’S
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE BY SIMPLY
WAVING IT.
THE JUDGE POINTED OUT THAT THERE
IS A CASE BEFORE THE
SUPREME COURT JUST THIS YEAR IN
WHICH THE HIGH COURT SUGGESTED
THAT IT CAN’T DO THAT, IT WOULD
RENDER MEANINGLESS ANY
PRESIDENT’S EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE,
SO THIS IS A BLOW TO
MERRICK GARLAND, BUT I DON’T
THINK HE TAKES THIS SITTING
DOWN.
I SUSPECT HE IS SERIOUSLY
CONSIDERING AN APPEAL.
>> LET’S GET YOUR TAKE FROM A
POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE.
>> I FIND IT AMAZING THAT PEOPLE
AREN’T UP IN ARMS ABOUT WHAT’S
GOING ON, ESPECIALLY IN CONTEXT
OF THE 2016 REFUSAL BY DEMOCRATS
TO ACCEPT THE ELECTION RESULTS,
WHO ARE THE THREAT TO DEMOCRACY, NOT DONALD TRUMP.
NOT DONALD TRUMP.
THEY FABRICATED THAT HOAX, AND
THERE STILL HAS NOT BEEN JUSTICE
FOR THAT, AND NOW WE KNOW THEY
HAVE SUPPRESSED -- EVIDENCE.
THAT WOULD SCARE PEOPLE.
WHY IS THE FBI DOING THIS?
WHY ARE THEY SO THEY SO
WEAPONIZED AND POLITICIZED?
NOW, WE SEE THIS CONTINUING
PATTERN AND VIEW IT IN THE
CONTEXT OF WHAT’S GOING ON
TODAY.
FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST
WANTS AN OBJECTIVE REVIEWER OF
THESE DOCUMENTS TO TELL US
WHETHER THEY ARE LEGITIMATE, AND
IF SOME OF THEM ARE COVERED BY
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE OR
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, AS
GREG SAID, AND WHAT DID THEY
HAVE TO FEAR?
YOU HAVE LIBERALS LIKE DAN
RATHER, WHO TENDS TO BE SAYING
THAT IT’S SOME KIND OF
CONSPIRACY IN THAT TRUMP HAS
MANIPULATED THIS, AND A JUDGE
BEHIND THIS, HE WAS IN THEIR
BACK POCKET, AND SHE ISSUED THIS
ORDER, BUT WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID
OF?
WE WANT TRANSPARENCY, THEY WANT
TO KEEP IT SECRET.
THEY ARE BLACKING OUT
EVERYTHING, WE WANT
TRANSPARENCY.
THE SIDE THAT WANTS TRANSPARENCY
IS THE SIDE TO NOT BE SUSPICIOUS
OF.
>> THIS WILL BE INTERESTING.
WE WILL SEE WHERE THE JUDGE GOES
WITH THIS NEXT.
YOU DEDICATED THIS BOOK U.N.
CHRISTIAN ROOTS, TO YOUR
BROTHER, WHO WE ALL MISS DEARLY.