Well, folks, I think it's time. We consider the fact that there's a good chance that Clarence
Thomas May be the most corrupted Supreme Court justice to ever serve on the United States
Supreme Court. It was revealed this week, once again by ProPublica that Thomas had accepted
a gift that he did not report in the form of tuition payments of $6,000 per month for
his great nephew's private school. Now, this great nephew of, uh, Clarence Thomas, he said
in the 2007 interview, we're raising him as a son. So you're raising him as if he is your
son. Therefore, any tuition payments to this child for this child would be viewed as a
reportable gift for the justice. And he didn't report it. However, there was another donor
who wasn't a multi-billionaire who did pay some of the tuition too, and Clarence Thomas
did report that one, but he didn't report the thousands and thousands of dollars in
tuition payments made from Harlan Crow.
So Republicans who were out there saying like, it wasn't his kid, he didn't have to do this.
Harlan Crow, just a guy that loves kids' education. Nope, cuz he reported the one but didn't report
the other. So it shows you that not only, not only was this reportable, but Clarence
Thomas knew, he knew how this would look if he reported the money from Harlan Crow. So
he made the intentional decision to not report that one, but to report the other one. You
have intent. Now folks, if this were a criminal trial, that would be the smoking gun and he
would be convicted.
But it's not a criminal trial. There's nothing we can do. There's nothing we can do. I mean,
that could be it. Like we could just fade to black right now cuz there's nothing we
can do. Now you do finally have some Democrats in the Senate that are getting off. They're
off that Chief Justice John Roberts refused to come and willingly testify. And they said
they're requesting documents from Clarence Thomas. If he doesn't turn over those documents,
they'll see what their legal avenue is after that. But here's the thing that I I, I talked
about last time when we talked about Roberts, if they end up issuing a subpoena to Clarence
Thomas and Thomas just simply says, I'm not gonna comply, then what? Right? Because I
know some people out there on social media are saying, listen, the Democrats actually
can do a lot about this and they're gonna do it. Relax. But that's the thing is like
even if the Democrats try to do the things and Clarence Thomas
Just says no. Okay, so where do you take it? The Supreme Court, like every justice would
have to recuse themselves. So then what happens? Then? What happens if those justices don't
recuse themselves and vote to protect him from the subpoena? You still can't do anything
about 'em. You don't have the numbers to impeach 'em all. So at the end of the day, like I'm
looking 10 steps ahead, while some people are like, no, there's still one and two steps.
Those little baby steps of things we could do don't matter because ultimately at the
end the Supreme Court can just say no and then we can't do anything. Then we're screwed.
But we have a lawless Supreme Court, we have a corrupted justice, both him and his wife,
Jenny Thomas, cuz I know we're all familiar with her issues. And this is nuts. This is
nuts that we can't do anything. This is nuts. That they could simply say, we're not gonna
comply. If you subpoena us, who you gonna run to? We're the Supreme Court. If we say
no, you can't do anything. That's how terrifying this situation is. That's how skewed the balance
of power in Washington DC has become. I didn't think we'd hit this point, but we're at this
point right now, and Clarence Thomas, the Republicans are the ones who put us.