TOMORROW NIGHT.
♪
KENNEDY: HEY GUYS.
WELCOME TO A NEW WEEK.
ANYTHING GOING ON?
NOT REALLY.
SHOCKWAVES CONTINUE TO
REVERBERATE AFTER THE SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE,
COURT OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE,
OUTRAGE ON ONE SIDE, GELATION ON
ANOTHER, A NATION ALREADY SO
DIVIDED, WHERE WE GO NEXT?
THREE DAYS SINCE THE TOP COURT
RELEASED CONTROVERSIAL RULING.
WHAT FOLLOWED, GROTESQUE
VIOLENCE, THREATS AND CHAOS IN
PROGRESSIVE LAWMAKERS WHO DON’T
LIKE THE DECISION VOWING TO
IMPEACH CONSERVATIVES.
AND PACKED THE COURT.
>> A CONFIRMATION HEARING IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
>> I BELIEVE SO.
I BELIEVE LYING UNDER OATH IS AN
IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
>> THIS COURT LOST LEGITIMACY.
I BELIEVE WE NEED TO GET SOME
CONFIDENCE BACK IN OUR COURT AND
THAT MEANS WE NEED MORE JUSTICES
ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT.
KENNEDY: WE NEED MORE JUSTICES ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT THAT ARE ON THE JET
ROSTER.
DEMOCRATS SCREAM FROM THE
RAFTERS, VOTERS SAY THE RULING
MAY NOT REALLY AFFECT THE
NOVEMBER MIDTERMS.
COULD THAT BE?
WATCH THIS.
>> DOES IT AFFECT THE MIDTERMS,
IT WILL BE NOMINAL.
>> YOU HAVE TO SUPPORT THE
CANDIDATE TO MAKE SURE WOMEN’S
RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED.
>> THE PEOPLE PRO-LIFE ARE
REPUBLICAN TWICE ARE DEMOCRAT.
I DON’T THINK IT WILL CHANGE THE
VOTES.
KENNEDY: HOW SEISMIC OF THE
DECISION WAS THIS AND HOW MIGHT
IT PLAY OUT?
WHAT DOES IT MEAN IN THE LONG
RUN?
TONIGHT PARTY PANEL, NEW YORK
POST COLUMNIST AND SPECTATOR USA
CONTRIBUTOR, KAROL MARKOWICZ.
DEMOCRAT STRATEGIST RADIO HOST AND FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR, SHE’S
AND FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR, SHE’S
IN BRUIN YELLOW IN FRONT OF BLUE
AND BLUE, LESLEY MARSHALL I
APPROVE.
HOST OF THE RADICAL SHANE HAZEL
PODCAST AND GEORGIA LIBERTARIAN
GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE, SHANE
HAZEL IS BACK.
EXCELLENT WORK, EVERYONE.
I’M JUST SAYING THAT AS IF WE
WERE IN A TIME MACHINE, GREAT PANEL, LET’S START.
PANEL, LET’S START.
I’M KIND OF RELIEVED THE
REACTIONS WEREN’T AS BAD AS IT
WOULD HAVE BEEN, I THINK IF THIS
DECISION HAD COME DOWN AND BEEN
SURPRISED, IF THE PUMP HADN’T
BEEN PRIMED AND MAY, DO THINK IT
WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE WITH THE
HADN’T BEEN THE LINK?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
I THINK IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE
BAD FOR REPUGNANCE BUT I THINK
IT HELPED BECAUSE IT TEMPERED
THE HYSTERIA OR OUTRAGE OVER THE
DECISION SO I THINK IT ENDS UP HELPING BECAUSE THE CONSERVATIVE
HELPING BECAUSE THE CONSERVATIVE
SIDE IS ABLE TO EXPLAIN WHEN ROE
V. WADE IS OVERTURNED, IT WOULD
STILL ONLY BE A STATE DECISION,
IT WOULD MEAN ABORTION WAS
OUTLAWED THROUGHOUT THE LAND SO
THAT IS A PLUS AND I THINK YOU
CAN SEE REPUBLICAN’S ARE BEING
QUIET RIGHT NOW AS AOC AND
PEOPLE FEEL SPACE TALK ABOUT
TALKING TO COURT AND DOING CRAZY
THINGS AND I’M HOPING DEMOCRATS
FOLLOW HER OFF THE CLIFF WHICH
THEY MIGHT BECAUSE WHAT
DEMOCRATS DO.
KENNEDY: LET ME ASK YOU AS A
PARENT, AS A MOM, THIS IS WHAT I
AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT BECAUSE
TO ME IT’S A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT
THINGS LUMPED TOGETHER AS ONE
THING BECAUSE SEX FOR MOST
PEOPLE IS JUST SEX, AND
ENJOYABLE THING WE ARE DRIVEN TO
DO BUT IT DOESN’T NECESSARILY
MEAN PREGNANCY OR BABY.
SHOULD THE DECISION MEAN WE
CONFLATE EVERYTHING AND NOW
ASSOCIATE SEX WITH BABIES?
>> I’M ON THE LEFT HERE, MAYBE
YOU FORGOT.
THAT SEEMS FROM WHERE I SIT TO
BE THE VIEW FROM THE RIGHT IS IF
YOU HAVE SEX, HE WILL GET
PREGNANT AND PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO
ARE PRO-CHOICE WANT EVERYBODY TO
ABORT THEIR BABIES AND THAT IS
NOT THE CASE BUT IT MAY BE UP
FOR GRABS ESPECIALLY IF YOU WANT
SEX WITH SOMEBODY AS THE SAME
GENDER AS YOURSELF LOOKING AT
THE AMENDMENT AND LOOKING AT
PRIVACY AND CLARENCE THOMAS AND
OTHERS ON THE RIGHT.
HERE’S WHERE I STAND AS A MOTHER
MOTHER, MY KIDS WON’T BE GOING
TO COLLEGE ANYMORE, BOY OR GIRL.
CONCERNED FRANKLY, ABOUT WHAT IS
COMING NOT JUST 26 STATES AND
COUNTING BUT WHAT HAPPENS IF
REPUBLICANS GIVING THEM CONTROL
OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE AND
WHITE HOUSE, FOR YEARS FROM NOW
OR TWO AND A HALF YEARS, WHAT
WILL HAPPEN THEN?
THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT A FEDERAL
BAN AND FEDERAL TRUMP STATE AND
THE PEOPLE SAY YOU LIVE IN
CALIFORNIA, YOU CAN’T GET
ABORTION ANYTIME, THAT WON’T BE
THE CASE IN ALL 50 STATES, THAT
CONCERNS ME, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
AND SEX AND CONSTANT HUDSON’S
WANT.
KENNEDY: I THOUGHT YOU WOULD BE
FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND
CONTRACEPTION SO YOUR --
>> I AM FOR IT, I’M NOT FOR THE
RIGHT BEING STRIPPED AND THAT’S
THE DANGER.
KENNEDY: IT’S INTERESTING
BECAUSE I WILL GIVE YOU THAT, I
DO THINK THIS GOES TO SHOW HOW
EVEN GINSBERG REVEALED YEARS AGO
SHE THOUGHT ROE V. WADE BANGLE
ON A PRECIPICE AND NOT
FOUNDATIONAL LIKE SO MANY PEOPLE
BELIEVED.
THAT IS ONE THING BUT THEY CAN’T
TAKE BACK GAY MARRIAGE OR TAKE
AWAY CONTRACEPTION.
>> I WILL STAND IN THE WAY OF
THOSE TWO BULLET TRAINS.
KENNEDY: HANG ON --
>> YOU CANNOT TAKE BACK MARRIAGE
YOU CANNOT TAKE BACK CONTRACEPTION, TOOTHPASTE IS OUT
CONTRACEPTION, TOOTHPASTE IS OUT
OF THE HORSE, SHANE.
>> DECENTRALIZATION IS WHERE
THAT.
THIS IS WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN,
IT’S HAPPENED WITH CANNABIS
ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND I’M HAPPY
TO SEE THIS HAPPENING WITH
ABOLITION AND GENERAL WHERE
ABOLITION HAS BEEN IN THE HANDS
OF GOVERNMENT, ABSOLUTELY A
DISASTER.
IF YOU LOOK AT PLACES LIKE
CHICAGO WITH THE LEFT WHERE THEY OUTLAWED BUNS, IT’S DISASTROUS
OUTLAWED BUNS, IT’S DISASTROUS
WITH THE REST OF THE COUNTRY AND
MOST PLACES WHERE THEY HAVE GONE
OUT AND DONE ABOLITION WITH THE
DRUG WAR, IT IS A DISASTER.
THE SAME THING AT THE FEDERAL
LEVEL WITH ABORTION, WE’VE SEEN
ABORTION IN THIS COUNTRY IN
TERMS OF INFANTICIDE, 70 MILLION
BABIES SLAUGHTERED.
THE BEST THING WE COULD HAVE
DONE WAS GET THIS OUT OF THE
HANDS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
AND DECENTRALIZED IT AND IT’S A
NUANCED CONVERSATION I THINK IF
WE EXAMINED IT, MOST PEOPLE WHO
ARE PRO-LIFE, IF THEY CONSIDER
MURDERERS AND THIEVES AND THE
GOVERNMENT DRIVE OFF TAKING
MONEY AND MURDERING PEOPLE, THEY
WOULDN’T PUT THE CHOICE OF LIFE
FOR BABIES OR ANYBODY IN THE
HANDS OF GOVERNMENT.
KENNEDY: THEY WOULD IT ALSO
ACKNOWLEDGE THERE’S A DEATH
INVOLVED REGARDLESS OF WHO
SHOULD MAKE THE DECISION AND I
DO BELIEVE IT IS INCREDIBLY
PERSONAL DECISION AND NOT
SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE ABOUT
LIKE A POLITICAL BEACH BALL AT A
FISH CONCERT, IT’S MUCH MORE
PERSONAL, MUCH MORE PROFOUND
THAN THAT AND I THINK BOTH SIDES
HAVE BEEN INCREDIBLY
IRRESPONSIBLE HERE AND ONE OF
THE RESPONSES I’VE SEEN PEOPLE
GLAMORIZING IT, IT IS OFFENSIVE
AND WRONG AND NOT THE WAY WE
SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT IT
REGARDLESS OF HOW FUNDAMENTALLY
THE CONVERSATIONS ARE BETWEEN A
WOMAN AND HER DOCTOR, I’M SORRY BUT I DO BELIEVE IN THIS CASE
BUT I DO BELIEVE IN THIS CASE
ABOUT EVERYBODY HAS IT WRONG AND
IT’S ENDED UP IN THE WRONG PLACE
AND YOU SAY ABOLITION, I SAY