OVER BACKGROUND CHECKS AND DEMOCRATS SAY WHISTLEBLOWERS
WARNING ABOUT IMPROPER INFLUENCE
IN DONALD TRUMP’S INFAMOUS TAX
AUDIT.
AUDIT. WE BEGIN WITH WHAT YOU CALL THE
RIDICULOUS OBSCURING AND EXTREME
POWER POWER GRAB WHICH MAY FAIL
IN THE COURTS.
THERE’S A LOT OF NEWS THIS WEEK
THAT COULD BE FROM THE ONION,
DENMARK PUNKING TRUMP OVER HIS
MUSINGS ABOUT BUYING GREEN LOND.
TRUMP CANCELING A VISIT TO A
U.S. ALLY.
U.S. ALLY. AND, OF COURSE, THE STORY THAT
HAS EVERYONE ASKING TO DEFINE
THE WORD STAR.
SEAN SPICER ON A DANCE SHOW.
THESE ARE SPICY STORIES.
SOME ARE PURELY MADCAP LIKE
SPICER IS, SOME ARE SPATS THAT
REVEAL SOMETHING LARGER AS U.S.
FOREIGN POLICY CAN TURN ON
TRUMP’S FRENEMY ISSUES.
OUR TOP STORY TONIGHT IS ABOUT
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S
ACTIONS THAT ARE SOME HISTORY
REACHING EXTREME DEGREES.
SO IF YOU HEARD MUCH ABOUT THIS
TOP STORY TONIGHT, NOTE DONALD
TRUMP ISN’T TWEETING MUCH ABOUT
IT, IT DOESN’T INVOLVE TROLLING
OR REALITY SHOWS.
IT IS ABOUT A PRESIDENT SEIZING
NEW POWERS TO DETAIN PEOPLE
INDEFINITELY.
INDEFINITELY. LET ME REPEAT.
INDEFINITE DETENTION.
INDEFINITE DETENTION. THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, MOST DEM
CREATIONS SEVERELY LIMIT THE
GOVERNMENT’S POWER TO DETAIN
PEOPLE, PEOPLE NOT JUST ADULTS,
NOT JUST LEGAL RESIDENTS BUT ALL
PEOPLE BECAUSE PROTECTIONS FOR
HUMAN RIGHTS APPLY TO ALL
HUMANS.
HUMANS. KEEP THAT IN MIND AS YOU TAKE IN
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S NEW
FEDERAL RULE SEIZING DETENTION
POWERS ATTEMPTING TO ABOLISH THE
CURRENT COURT APPROVED LIMIT HOW
LONG MIGRANT FAMILIES ARE
DETAINED.
DETAINED. TRUMP CLAIMING THE POWER TO HOLD
IT FOR AS LONG AS THEIR CASES TO
GET DECIDED.
GET DECIDED. SOME OFFICIALS SAY THAT COULD BE
MONTHS BUT THERE’S NO FORMAL
LIMIT.
LIMIT. NO LIMIT MEANS NO LIMIT.
INDEFINITE.
INDEFINITE. SOME PEOPLE COULD BE RELEASED
BEFORE 20 DAYS ARE UP, OTHERS
MIGHT NOT BE RELEASED FOR MONTHS
OR YEARS.
OR YEARS. TRUMP’S OWN OFFICIALS ARE
STRUGGLING TO DEFEND THIS TODAY.
>> SO THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS
INDEFINITE DETENTION.
INDEFINITE DETENTION. >> WHAT WOULD THE MAXIMUM BE?
>> THERE IS NO MAXIMUM.
THAT IS WHAT’S REQUIRED COMPLETE
THE CASE.
THE CASE. THESE INDIVIDUALS.
THESE INDIVIDUALS. >> THERE’S NO.
>> IT’S IMPORTANT.
>> THERE’S NO MAXIMUM EQUALS
INDEFINITELY.
INDEFINITELY. >> NO, IT DOES NOT.
>> THAT’S A HUGE DEAL.
IT HAS BEEN IN THE WORKS BUT THE
FORMAL RULE IS NOW BEING
RELEASED IN THESE WANING DAYS OF
SUMMER.
SUMMER. AFTER MONTHS OF IMMIGRATION
CONTROVERSIES.
CONTROVERSIES. SO WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW?
FIRST, THIS IS IS AN ATTEMPTED
POWER GRAB BUT TRUMP DOESN’T GET
THE LAST WORD BECAUSE THIS WOULD
CHANGE AGREEMENT THE PRESIDENTS
IN BOTH PARTIES HAVE FOLLOWED.
A JUDGE MUST STILL APPROVE THE
PLAN.
PLAN. THE AGREEMENT IT WOULD ALTER IS
FROM THE FLORES AGREEMENT.
WHY IS THAT THAT AGREEMENT?
HERE’S THE STORY THAT PREDATES
TRUMP.
TRUMP. MANY PRESIDENTS IN BOTH PARTIES
HAVE BEEN REINED IN BY THE
COURTS OVER MISTREATING MIGRANTS
AND TRYING TO LEAN TOWARDS
INDEFINITE DETENTION WHEN IT
HAPPENS.
HAPPENS. BACK IN THE 1980s, MIGRANT KIDS
FLEEING VIOLENCE WERE KEPT IN
THE ATROCIOUS CONDITIONS CAN
HELD BEHIND A BARRICADE OF RAZOR
WIRE SURROUND AGOLD MOTEL IN BAS
PASADENA, LOCKED IN OVERCROWDED
ROOMS, CHILDREN AND ADULTS
JAMMED TOGETHER.
JAMMED TOGETHER. "THE NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTING
THOSE KIDS DIDN’T GET
RECREATION, VISITS WITH
RELATIVES AND ENDURED BODY
CAVITY SEARCHES.
CAVITY SEARCHES. TFDS TOOK JUDGES REBUKING THE
ADMINISTRATION TO STOP THE
PROBLEM.
PROBLEM. WE DUG UP HOW THAT YOU LAWSUIT
FROM THAT THE COURT BATTLE WAS
REPORTED AT THE TIME.
>> 14-YEAR-OLD ALMA HAS BEEN HE
WOULD HELD IN THIS DETENTION
CENTER FOR A MONTH AND A HALF
SINCE SHE WAS CAUGHT TRYING TO
ENTER THE COUNTRY.
UNDER IMMIGRATION AND
NATURALIZATION SERVICE POLICY,
SHE CAN BE RELEASED ONLY TO A
PARENT.
PARENT. >> Translator: BUT HER MOTHER IS
AFRAID TO PICK HER UP FOR FEAR
THEY WILL BOTH BE DEPORTED.
LAWYERS FROM THE CENTERS FOR
YOUTH LAW AND IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS
CHARGE THE CHILDREN ARE BEING
USED AS BAIT TO CATCH PARENTS.
THEY FILED A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING
THE POLICY AND THE CONDITIONS
UNDER WHICH YOUNGSTERS ARE HELD.
>> THAT WAS A HUGE DEAL.
THEY WON A PART OF THAT BATTLE,
SETTING THESE RULES ULTIMATELY
FINALIZED BY COURTS IN THE
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION.
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION. THOSE RULES ARE PART OF THE
FRAMEWORK FOR MOST OF THESE
BATTLES TODAY FROM OBAMA’S
HANDLING OF A CENTRAL AMERICAN
MIGRANT SEARCH SO TRUMP’S
CRACKDOWNS.
CRACKDOWNS. .
. THEY CLAIM THAT DOING THAT WAS
SO THEY WOULDN’T BE ACCUSED OF
HOLDING KIDS PAST THE 20-DAY
MARK AND NOW AT A TIME WHEN
STEVEN MILLER CONSOLIDATED MORE
POWER OVER THE ENTIRE
IMMIGRATION SYSTEM, WE SEE THEY
WILL WHOLESALE ATTACK ON THESE
HUMAN RIGHTS RULES.
JUDGES COULD REJECT THIS JUST
LIKE THEY RECENTLY REJECTED THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTACK ON
RULES TO PROVIDE TOOTHPASTE AND
SO TO DETAINED KIDS BUT LET’S
LOOK AT THIS ALL TOGETHER.
AS A MATTER OF ETHICS THESE
RULES SET A MINIMUM THRESHOLD
FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DIGNITY.
AS A MATTER OF IDEOLOGY, HONEST
CONSERVATIVES AND CIVIL
LIBERTARIANS SUPPORT THE
PROTECTIONS BOTH AS HUMAN RIGHTS
AND AS A LIMIT ON GOVERNMENT
POWER.
POWER. YOU REMEMBER ALL THE ARGUMENTS
ABOUT STEMMING THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT’S POWER?
GOVERNMENT’S POWER? SOME OF THAT LOOKS EMPTY AS A
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT TRIES TO
SEIZE THESE NEW POWERS OF
INDEFINITE DETENTION.
INDEFINITE DETENTION. ONE MORE THING, IF THIS TERM
RINGS A VAGUE BELL, IF IT SOUNDS
CONCERNING, RECALL THE LAST TIME
THE SUPREME COURT LIMITED THE
GOVERNMENT’S POWER TO HOLD
FOREIGNERS IN INDEFINITE
DETENTION.
DETENTION. IT WAS IN A CASE WHERE THE
ARGUMENTS FOR IT ARE THE
STRONGEST POSSIBLE INDEFINITELY
HOLDING SUSPECTED TERRORISTS AND
ENEMY COMBATANTS AT GUANTANAMO
BAY.
BAY. THERE WERE SOME STRONG SECURITY
ARGUMENTS THERE, SOME OF THOSE
PEOPLE LOOKED TERRIBLE BUT THAT
DIDN’T MEAN A PRESIDENT COULD
OVERRULE CONGRESS AND THE COURTS
TO CLAIM THOSE UNILATERAL
DETECTION POWERS EVEN REGARDING
FOREIGNERS OR SUSPECTED
TERRORISTS.
TERRORISTS. SOME OF THOSE CLAIMS TO
INDEFINITE DETENTION WITHOUT
TRIAL WERE REJECTED BY A
CONSERVATIVE LEANING SUPREME
COURT AND RULED
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THIS HISTORY IS THE CONTEXT FOR
THIS POWER GRAB TODAY THAT
DONALD TRUMP’S NOT TWEETING
ABOUT.
ABOUT. IT’S THE CONTEXT FROM THE FLORES
TO GITMO TO STEVEN MILLER AND
THIS IS A TIME TO KEEP YOUR EYE
ON THE BALL.
I’M JOINED BY JASON JOHNSON FROM
THE ROOT, VICTOR DEFRANCESCO
SOTO FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS, AND HOST OF ADVICE’S
LATIN X.
LATIN X. YOUR THOUGHTS?
YOUR THOUGHTS? >> I THINK YOU FRAMED IT
PERFECTLY.
PERFECTLY. I THINK THIS GOES WAY BEYOND
IMMIGRATION POLICY.
IMMIGRATION POLICY. THIS GOES WAY BEYOND ANY SORT OF
DETERRENCE TACTICS.
DETERRENCE TACTICS. THIS IS THEM DELIBERATELY AND
STRATEGIC LITTLE TRYING TO
REWRITE WHO IS SBILED TO BASIC
HUMAN RIGHTS.
HUMAN RIGHTS. MY QUESTION, INSTEAD OF BROWN
KIDS IN THESE DETENTION CENTERS,
INSTEAD OF THEM IF WE HAD
AMERICAN KIDS, WHITE KIDS,
EUROPEAN KIDS, WOULD THEY BE
PUSHING FOR IN SO HARD?
KNOWING WHAT WE KNOW, THEY DON’T
HAVE TOOTHPASTE IN THERE, THERE
ARE KIDS SLEEPING IN CHANGES WE
KNOW THAT SEVEN CHILDREN DIED
UNDER THEIR WATCH.
WE KNOW THEY DON’T HAVE ACCESS
TO VACCINES TO BASIC SHOTS.
KNOWING ALL OF THIS, WHY?
WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS.
>> WHY RIGHT NOW.
>> I GO BACK TO ONE THING I
HEARD THIS WEEK.
AS DONALD TRUMP WAS PUSHING THIS
ANTI-ABORTION EFFORT, RIGHT.
>> HE WAS USING THESE WORDS AND
KEPT SAYING EVERY CHILD IS A
GIFT OF GOD.
HE SAID THOSE WORDS.
EVERY CHILD IS A SECRET GIFT OF
GOD.
GOD. ARE THOSE CHILDREN IS?
DOES HE VIEW THEM THE SAME WAY.
>> THAT’S VERY IMPORTANT.
WE’RE TALKING ABOUT WHAT THE
GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO WHOM AND TO
HUMAN BEINGS YOU’RE TALKING
ABOUT THE VALUE OF LIFE IN THAT
LANGUAGE.
LANGUAGE. JASON, VIEWERS KNOW YOU’RE NOT A
BIG FAN OF THE PRESIDENT.
I THINK IT’S IMPORTANT THAT WE
LOOK AT THIS STORY TONIGHT MUCH
BROADER THAN TRUMP WHICH IS WHY
WE REPORTED IT OUT WITH SOME OF
THAT CONTEXT.
THAT CONTEXT. REGARDLESS OF YOUR VIEWS OF THE
PRESIDENT, WHAT DO YOU THINK AND
WOULD YOU SUPPORT INDEFINITE
DETENTION POWERS FOR ANY
PRESIDENT?
PRESIDENT? >> NO, ARI.
THE REALLY DANGEROUS PART ABOUT
THIS IS YOU KNOW IN THE MILITARY
THEY CALL IT MISSION CREEP BUT
THE SAME THING CAN HAPPEN WITH
POLICY.
POLICY. IF YOU BASICALLY SAY I CAN
SEPARATE CHILDREN FROM THEIR
PARENTS UNTIL SOME LEGAL ISSUE
IS DETERMINED, RIGHT, AT THIS
POINT THEY’RE JUST SAYING UNTIL
SOMEONE’S IMMIGRATION STATUS
DETERMINED.
DETERMINED. WHAT HAPPENS IN THE INSTANCES
WHERE INFORMATION TO DETERMINE A
CHILD’S IMMIGRATION STATUS BASED
ON INFORMATION THEY WOULD HAVE
TO GET FROM THEIR PARENTS,
3-YEAR-OLD, 4-YEAR-OLDS,
3-YEAR-OLD, 4-YEAR-OLDS, 5-YEAR-OLDS, THEY WERE BROUGHT
HERE BY A PARENT WHO WAS FLEEING
VIOLENCE OR DANGER OR SOME OTHER
ISSUE.
ISSUE. IT IS AN EXCUSE TO BASICALLY
HOLD PEOPLE INDEFINITELY.
IF THAT CAN BE DONE TO PEOPLE
WHO ARE LEGALLY SEEKING THE
RIGHT TO COME TO THIS COUNTRY
AND SEEK REF FUTURE, THAT SAME
POLICY COULD BE USED ON AMERICAN
CITIZENS.
CITIZENS. THIS IS KEY AND ONE OF THE
REASONS THIS IS IMPORTANT.
NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES WE SAY
THAT THIS IS A TERRIBLE
ADMINISTRATION AND I LOVE MY
COUNTRY MORE THAN ANY PARTICULAR
PRESIDENCY.
PRESIDENCY. THE GREATEST FEAR WE HAVE TO
HAVE IS ANY ADMINISTRATION USING
A POWER THAT CAN SUBSEQUENTLY BE
USED BY SOMEONE WORSE DOWN THE
ROAD AND AS BAD AS WE THINK
DONALD TRUMP IS, IMAGINE THIS
SORT OF BEHAVIOR, IMAGINE THIS
SORT OF POLICY IN THE HANDS OF A
PRESIDENT WHO IS SLIGHTLY MORE
SOPHISTICATED THAT COULD USE IT
FOR ALL SORTS OF TERRORISM, GANG
MEMBERS COULD BE DEFINED AS
TERRORISTS AND HELD
INDEFINITELY.
INDEFINITELY. THAT IS THE DANGER WHAT THEY
COULD BECOME DOWN THE ROAD.
>> VICTORIA, HERE WAS THE
PRESIDENT ON THIS.
>> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S
HAPPENING WHEN THEY SEE YOU
CAN’T GET INTO THE UNITED STATES
OR WHEN THEY SEE IF THEY DO GET
IN THE UNITED STATES, THEY WILL
BE BROUGHT BACK TO THEIR
COUNTRY, IT WON’T MATTER IF THEY
GET IN OR NOT BECAUSE WE’RE
DOING THAT, THEY WON’T COME.
>> THERE’S A LOT IN THERE
INCLUDING A THEORY ABOUT HOW
INFORMATION ABOUT TRAVEL BACK.
AND WHETHER INDEFINITE DETENTION
NOTWITHSTANDING WHAT I LAID OUT
IS WRONG WITH ITTING WILL STILL
BE CONSIDERED WORSE THAN WHAT
PEOPLE MAY BE FLEEING.
>> SO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION,
STEVEN MILNER PARTICULAR, HAS
ARGUED THAT HAVING FAMILIES,
FAMILY PROTECTIONS, PROTECTIONS
FOR CHILDREN BASICALLY THE
FLORES SETTLEMENT IS INCENTIVE
FOR FOLKS FROM CENTRAL AMERICA
TO COME, THEIR GET OUT OF JAIL
FREE CARD.
FREE CARD. THESE PEOPLE ARE COMING HERE
BECAUSE THEY ARE FLEEING
VIOLENCE.
VIOLENCE. THE CENTRAL AMERICAN COUNTRIES
IN THE NORTHERN TRIANGLE ARE THE
ONES WITH SOME OF THE HIGHEST
HOMICIDE RATES.
HOMICIDE RATES. THE OTHER PIECE TO THIS IS THAT
WE ALSO SEE SOME OF THE HIGHEST,
DID, THE MASSIVE GANG CULTURE
TAKING PLACE IN EL SALVADOR WITH
TARGETING WOMEN IN PARTICULAR.
YOU’RE NOT GOING TO LEAVE YOUR
CHILD.
CHILD. YOU’RE FLEEING FOR YOUR LIFE AND
NOT GOING TO LEAVE YOUR KID AND
IS SAY I’M GOING TO GO HERE TO
SAFETY.
SAFETY. THAT’S WHY WE HAVE THE HAVE THE
FAMILY UNITS COMING OVER.
IT’S NOT AN INCENTIVE.
INSTEAD OF ATTACKING THE VICTIMS
OF VIOLENCE, WHY DON’T WE GIVE
ECONOMIC AID, HELP WITH THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THESE
PLACES.
PLACES. ARI IT, COSTS $3.5 MILLION A DAY
TO FUND DETENTION CENTERS HERE
IN THE UNITED STATES.
IF WE TOOK THAT MONEY AND USED
IT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, WE
WOULD NOT BE IN THE MESS AND THE
HUMANITARIAN CRISIS THAT WE ARE
RIGHT NOW.
RIGHT NOW. >> YEAH, AND THE REASON I
MENTIONED SOME OF THE HISTORY
THAT THIS AGREEMENT WAS STRUCK
UNDER THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION
TO REIN THEM IN, THAT THE OBAMA
ADMINISTRATION HAD HIGH
DEPORTATION RATES AND STRUGGLED
WITH THE FLORES AGREEMENT IS TO
MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND
WHILE THERE ARE WAYS THAT TRUMP
ACCORDING TO THE FACTS AND
EVIDENCE WE’VE SHOWN IS FAR MORE
HARSH AND MORE HUMAN RIGHTS
ABUSES.
ABUSES. THE SYSTEM HERE IS ABOUT WHETHER
THE EXECUTIVE IN OUR AMERICAN
SYSTEM WILL ACTUALLY BE HELD
ACCOUNTABLE OR NOT.
THAT’S WHEN YOU HEAR INDEFINITE
DETENTION, YOU HAVE TO PERK UP.
IT HAPPENS THERE’S A REPUBLICAN
ADMINISTRATION RIGHT NOW AND
THEY’RE MORE EXTREME ACCORDING
TO RULINGS AND EVIDENCE WE’VE
GOT.
GOT. BUT AS WE’VE BEEN DISCUSSION
IT’S BROADER THAN THAT.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE DEMOCRATS
IN CONGRESS TODAY SPEAKING OUT
WHERE IT DOES GET BACK TO THE
POLITICAL SIDE OF IT, NOT JUST
THE STRUCTURAL.
THE STRUCTURAL. TAKE A LOOK.
>> THAT’S ACTUALLY WHAT THE
ADMINISTRATION PROPOSES TO DO
TODAY TO DETAIN FRIGHTENED
FAMILYIES WHO WIT’S END AT THEIR
MOST VULNERABLE INDEFINITELY
GOING FORWARD.
GOING FORWARD. THIS CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO
STAND.
STAND. >> THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF
THIS ADMINISTRATION’S CRUELTY.
>> EVERYTHINGING ABOUT
IMMIGRATION HE’S DONE TO TRY TO
SCARE PEOPLE.
SCARE PEOPLE. >> JASON, SOME OF THOSE FORMER
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, MANY OF
THEM RECOGNIZABLE AS PIR RANTS
FOR THE WHITE HOUSE BUT WHEN YOU
LOOK AT THAT, WHAT DO YOU SEE IS
IMPORTANT HERE?
IMPORTANT HERE? BECAUSE WHEN THE DEMOCRATS COME
IN AT THE MICROLEVEL, RIGHT,
WHICH IS INDIVIDUAL CASES, THEIR
STORIES, THEY’RE POWERFUL, BUT
IT SEEMS THAT TODAY IS A MARKER
WHERE WE’RE AT THE MACRO LEVEL.
STEVEN MILLER WAS NOT KIDDING
WHEN HE CAME OUT AND SAID THE
PRESIDENT’S POWERS SHALL NOT BE
QUESTIONED.
QUESTIONED. >> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. AND THAT’S THE THING, ARI.
THIS GOES BACK TO STEVE BANNON.
BANNON’S THEORY THAT THE BEST
WAY TO SORT OF OVERTAKE THIS
COUNTRY WAS TO TEAR DOWN THE
STATE, TO MAKE THE STATE SO
DYSFUNCTIONAL THAT YOU WILL LEAD
TO CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE WILL
LEAVE IS, SELF-DEPORT AND ALLOW
THE RIGHT WING FORCES TO GO
FORWARD.
FORWARD. IF THIS ADMINISTRATION HAD NOT
PULLED SO MUCH FUNDING AWAY FROM
IMMIGRATION COURTS THIS MAY NOT
BE AS MUCH OF A PROBLEM.
THE ISSUE IS, YOU HAVE PULLED
FUNDING AWAY FROM IMMIGRATION
COURTS.
COURTS. PEOPLE’S CASES ARE SITTING THERE
AND STACKING UP AND TRAPPED FOR
MONTHS AND MONTHS AND NOW YOU’RE
SAYING YOU CAN HOLD THEM
FOREVER.
FOREVER. THIS IS A SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM
THAT THIS ADMINISTRATION CREATED
SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE WHAT
WITH THEIR WHITE NATIONALIST
POLICY.
POLICY. THAT IS THE DANGEROUS HERE THAT
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
CONSISTENTLY CREATES PROBLEMS,
IT CREATES ARE FAMILY SEPARATION
AND USE THAT IS TO PUSH THROUGH
THESE KINDS OF DANGEROUS.
THAT IS WHAT MANY CANDIDATES
SHOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION TO.
THE STRUCTURAL MESS WILL HAVE TO
BE SOLVED BY ONE OF THESE PEOPLE
IF THEY END UP BEING PRESIDENT
NEXT YEAR.
NEXT YEAR. >> HE SAID IT PERFECTLY FINE.
THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT HE
THIS MEANS LOGISTICALLY.
THIS IS PART OF THEIR WHITE
SUPREMACIST MANIFESTO.
SUPREMACIST MANIFESTO. IT READS LIKE IT, FEELS LIKE IT
AND HAPPENING IN FRONT OF OUR
EYES EVERY DAY.