THINKS IS GOING TO RUN AGAINST
HIM IN 2024.
ALAYNA HA BID IS AN ATTORNEY AND
JOINS US NOW.
ARE WE GOING TO SEE THE
AFFIDAVIT?
ARE WE GOING TO SEAT THE MEAT ON
THE BONE ON WHY THE JUDGE
AUTHORIZED THE WARRANT FOR THE
FULL SCALE SEARCH OF MAR-A-LAGO?
>> NO.
I DON’T THINK SO.
DON’T FORGET JUDGE RINEHART IS
THE SAME MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAT
RECUSED HIMSELF FROM MY HILLARY
CASE A MONTH AGO.
IS HE DEFINITELY NOT GOING TO BE
A FRIENDLY JUDGE, NECESSARILY,
AND THERE’S -- I WOULD SAY IT
WAS HIGHLY UNLIKELY AS WE CAN
SEE THE DOJ IS ALREADY SAYING
THAT THEY DO NOT WANT US TO SEE
WHAT WAS IN THE AFFIDAVIT,
USUALLY THAT’S TO PROTECT
WITNESSES AND OTHER THINGS THAT
HAVE BEEN COOPERATING WITH THE
JUSTICE SYSTEM.
SO, WHILE I WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT
AND UNDERSTAND WHY YOU WOULD ASK
FOR A RAID WITH A COOPERATING
PRESIDENT, DO I BELIEVE THAT
THIS JUDGE IS GOING TO REVEAL
IT?
NO, I DO NOT.
>> YOU MENTIONED THAT THIS
MAGISTRATE REMOVED HIMSELF FROM
THE CASE BETWEEN TRUMP AND
HILLARY CLINTON.
SO, ISN’T DONALD TRUMP IN THIS
CASE IN THE RELEASE OF THE
AFFIDAVIT, ISN’T HE ENTITLED TO
AN IMPARTIAL MAGISTRATE WHICH
DOESN’T SEEM LIKE JUDGE RINEHART
IS.
>> RIGHT.
ABSOLUTELY.
AS IS EVERY CITIZEN IN THIS
COUNTRY.
THAT’S WHY WE HAVE THE LEGAL
SYSTEM. THAT’S WHY WE ARE SUPPOSED TO
THAT’S WHY WE ARE SUPPOSED TO
HAVE IMPARTIAL JUDGES QUI ASK
HAVE ASKED FOR A SPECIAL MASTER.
THEY HAVE INDICATED THEY
WOULDN’T APT SPECIAL MASTER.
IT WOULD BE A NEUTRAL PARTY LIKE
THEY SAID AND PRECLUDE ANY FUNNY
BUSINESS FOR LACK OF A BETTER
WORD.
>> Sean: I’M CURIOUS, WHY DID
THE FBI WHEN THEY CAME SAY WE
WANT TO TURN OFF THE SECURITY
CAMERAS.
WHY COULDN’T THE TRUMP SECURITY
CAMERAS BE ON WHILE THEY ARE
RAIDING HIS PLACE OF BUSINESS
AND HIS HOME?
>> IT’S A VERY GOOD QUESTION.
I WAS NOT THERE.
BUT MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THEY
DID REQUEST IT BUT IT WAS NOT
MANDATED IN ANY WAY.
OF COURSE, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO
WANT CAMERAS ON.
YOU KNOW, THEY PROBABLY WANT TO
DO WHAT THEY DO WITHOUT ANYBODY
LOOKING.
IT’S THE SAME REASON THAT THE
ATTORNEYS WEREN’T ALLOWED TO
COME INTO THE PREMISES AND HAD
TO WAIT OUTSIDE IN THE HEAT.
SO, YOUR QUESTION IS AS GOOD AS
MINE.
GOOD GUESS.
>> Sean: YOU KNOW, WE KNOW SOME
OF THE DOCUMENTS OVERSEAS.
WE HAVE THE CLEMENCY GRANTING OF
ROGER STONE, WE HAD TRUMP’S
PASSPORTS BEING SEIZED.
THIS IS INDICATIVE OF THE FULL
SCALE SEIZURE OF PRESIDENT
TRUMP’S HOME.
HAVE YOU DONE AN ACCOUNTING OF
WHAT WAS TAKEN AND WHAT WASN’T?
IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYTHING BUT THE
TOILET PAPER WAS TAKEN OUT OF
THE RESIDENCE.
>> NO.
AND ANOTHER THING THAT IS AN
ISSUE, FRANKLY, IS THAT THERE IS
PRIVILEGE, YOU KNOW, ATTORNEY
GENERAL PRIVILEGE DOCUMENTS I
UNDERSTAND.
THERE MIGHT BE OTHER DOCUMENTS
AND THAT’S WIPE WE WANT SOMEBODY
TO GO THROUGH THESE WITH THE DOJ
AND COOPERATE WITH THEM AND US
TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS
DONE COPASETICLY.
I DON’T KNOW WHETHER THERE WAS
ANYTHING ELSE IN THERE.
I CAN TELL THAT YOU PRIVILEGED
DOCUMENTS ARE EXACTLY THAT
PASSPORTS.
I’M
♪ SURE WHY YOU WOULD TAKE
SOMEONE’S PASSPORT.
I DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT EITHER.
I DON’T KNOW HOW THAT IS EVEN
DONE IN ERROR.
AS WE NOW KNOW FAKE NEWS WAS
REPORTING THAT THEY WEREN’T
TAKEN BUT THEY WERE FOR A FACT
THAT THEY WERE.
WE HAD TO RELEASE AN EMAIL FROM
JAY BRAT SHOWING IT.
UNFORTUNATELY THERE ARE A LOT OF
QUESTIONS UNANSWERED AT THIS
POINT.
WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS ON
THURSDAY.
>> Sean: YOU KNOW, IT’S
IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE FBI
♪ ALWAYS PARTISAN AND I THINK TO
UNDERSCORE THAT POINT I WANT TO
GO TO A TWEET THAT WAS MADE BY
THE DISGRACED FBI AGENT PETER
STRZOK WHO PUT OUT RECENTLY
PLEASE, O PLEASE, KEEP ASKING
HOW YOU CAN TURN DOWN THE
TEMPERATURE ON THE COUNTRY AND
WHY DOES HE HAVE TWO PASSPORTS? THE RUSSIAN PASSPORT?
THE RUSSIAN PASSPORT?
OF COURSE, IS KEPT IN A VAULTING
[INAUDIBLE] ONLY SWAPPED OUT
THIRD COUNTRY MEET IT CANNOT BE
THAT ONE.
HERE YOU HAVE PETER STRZOK
SAYING LISTEN, OF COURSE DONALD
TRUMP HAS A PASSPORT AND RUSSIAN
PASSPORT.
IS HE STILL DRIVING THE RUSSIAN
NARRATIVE AFTER FOUR YEARS OF
DRIVING IT HAS BEEN DISCREDITED
BUT PETER STRZOK AND THE FBI IS
GOING RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA.
>> OH, GOD.
YOU KNOW WHAT MY ADVISE IS TO
MR. STRZOK, YOU ARE A DEFENDANT
IN MY CASE.
I RECOMMEND YOU FOCUS ON YOUR
MARRIAGE, SIR.
STAY OUT OF THIS ONE.
>> Sean: THAT’S PROBABLY PRETTY
GOOD ADVISE.
HERE IS WHAT I THINK IS HANG.
THE FBI AND THE DOJ DO NOT WANT
THE AFFIDAVIT OUT, RIGHT?
BECAUSE THEN WE GET TO SEE ALL
THE DETAILS OF WHY THEY DID THIS
SEARCH ON THE PRESIDENT.
WE WILL SEE THE POLITICAL NATURE
OF WHY THEY DID THIS SEARCH.
IF WE DON’T SEE THE AFFIDAVIT,
THEN THEY CAN JUST
SYSTEMATICALLY LEAK OUT THE
INFORMATION THEY WANT.
THEY GET TO CONTROL THE MEDIA
NARRATIVE BECAUSE IT’S ONLY THE
INFORMATION THEY WANT US TO SEE.
NOT THE INFORMATION THAT THEY
PUT IN THE AFFIDAVIT.
AM I RIGHT?
JOURNALIST CALLED ME WRITING
THIS STORY HOW YOU COULD SAY
THAT THE DOJ OR FBI COULD LEAK A
WITNESS.
THAT HAS NEVER HAPPENED, IT
WOULD NEVER HAPPEN.
AND HE ASKED ME FOR A COMMENT I
SAID I HAVE NO COMMENT BECAUSE
IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT
LEAKS DO NOT HAPPEN WHEN YOU
WERE DONALD TRUMP MAYBE NOT
OTHER PEOPLE BUT IN DONALD
TRUMP’S LIFE LEAKS HAPPEN.
ALL THE RULES ARE BROKEN AND
BENT AND THE CONSTITUTION
DOESN’T MATTER WHEN YOU ARE
DONALD J. TRUMP, UNFORTUNATELY.
>> Sean: THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE
HAD NO STORIES OVER THE FOUR
YEARS OF HIS PRESIDENCY IF IT
WASN’T FOR LEAKED.
HE WAS LEAKED BY EVERYBODY