and now have before with martin walker of our with various racial matter today
which apparently works just fine
don't she's done a great thing naha height i'd like her
you know what she didn't find in this report a circumstance under
idol of which he did
in terms of an apology for jess she had on
the other day now the reason i love this is because
never see this
anywhere else on couch uh... right now she had laura tyson on
she's an explanatory let's let's watch
underreported holy mackerel stories in today's news we begin with a little
housekeeping concerning segment we did last night on the bailout you may recall
that i propose reconstituting his t_v_ show as a bank
since the banks etc up wall street bailout money essentially got to take
that money and run with almost no questions asked
the application to bail out money for banks was a grand total of three pages
long and the base themselves essentially laughed in the face of the associated
press this week when the a_p_ make enquiries as to how the banks have used
those public dollars such as we all right
that in just two i brought on to discuss and debate to those issues itni was a
former chair of the white house counsel of economic advisers president clinton's
national economic advisor former hostage this school london business school dean
laura tyson eminently qualified to talk about the economic crisis and the
government's response to it
now what i regret that i did not realize at the time of last night's show is that
doctor tyson is also on the board of morgan stanley
now this is publicly available information and it is absolutely my
fault for not giving it up before the self fortunately my friend and frequent
guest columnist david surrender as things like sit like this memorized he
shot me an email about the conflict of interest since morgan stanley is a
company that receives ten billion dollars in tocqueville out many park
laura tyson told our show today cause highly professional economists and
business school professor appeared on the show and answer the questions in
this capacity insist reflects my professional opinion and i absolutely
responsible for them they do not represent the views of morgan stanley or
any other private company
and of course is there enough what higher regret is hosting a discussion
about companies that have benefited from the bailout without disclosing that one
of the people having that discussion has a significant financial interests unit
one of those companies
very sorry
investing
god screen
i maybe i'm over assessing about this but i'm i don't see t_v_ host during
that and pointing out that corporate connections of their guest i mean we
didn't do that for so long as partly what led to the iraq war
in iraq application for so long
new york times had couple billion articles about how these guys who work
for the defense industry with and come on and talked and barry mccaffrey was on
one man
military industrial complex
will come out and talk about how we needed to start the war how we need to
maintain the war and we need to do with those weapons that the his company was
selling dollars outrageous and it over and over again and hear about racial
points out there you know my bad i had a guest on at a total interest since added
you can give you some have more detail on that i did sir did have a column on
and he pointed out that laura tyson ideas three hundred fifty thousand
dollars a year for more recently she has seventy nine thousand shares of morris
family so when the other night she was on without us program
she said yes
or is that we should get the bailout
and yes they should keep paying dividends their shareholders
she was referring to itself
of course you can see should keep a dividends kisses as senator doesn't
share some of his family
duke regulations will be the only person who would appoint
and bothered to actually look and criticism
has set up a while
that's actually true and i will correct it
you know if you get criticized a lot you should do
intention to what they say
jim necessarily responded and
selling right
i wasn't there
fully wrong
ir pretty remote
contrasts at the what rush limbaugh does it we put it that common cause of us
home on the past when he said
pataki
we know that process
goes on right
okay night if right now approved one of the other but it certainly doesn't by
itself will be your update
now then if that's what it means
e that's what it proves in the least
cryptic
so of you any compare contrast the conservative most of the progress of
those you see the difference in open-mindedness
and i mean you make the call