Hello! My name is Seol-Yee, I go by 2 0:00:04.560,0:00:08.880 3 I am presenting The Decade in a Review: 4 A 10 year review of the methods and purposes of on-skin interface research in ACM SIGCHI.
Since it’s initial boom in popularity which can be 6 0:00:17.680,0:00:21.520 7 to include many different form factors ranging 8 from “pod”-like accessories such as smartwatch and wristbands all the way to on-skin interfaces which
is what we will be exploring today in this paper. 10 0:00:29.840,0:00:33.680 11 topic's current state, Although there are several 12 domain specific reviews such as the following --> none truly describe the current stage of on-skin
interface research. We aim to fill this gap. 14 0:00:42.000,0:00:45.920 15 we were to explore, The process can be broken 16 down into 4 simple steps: the compilation of the papers, the qualitative categorization, the
quantitative analysis, and the final discussion of 18 0:00:52.219,0:00:55.120 19 factors were necessary to consider, 20 Our primary database searched is the ACM SIGCHI database. Although we did explore
other databases such as IEEE, we found that the 22 0:01:02.720,0:01:06.960 23 conferences play significant roles in the on-skin 24 interface research field as conferences that only had one paper or no papers were excluded.
The Survey Period selected is 26 0:01:15.520,0:01:18.560 27 to analyze as it encompasses significant 28 events such as the debut of Google Glass and FitBits as well as their effects on the trends.
These are the specific paper types selected.
Workshop proposals and position papers 31 0:01:28.160,0:01:32.720 32 position papers having evolved into full papers, 33 Now let’s look at how we defined what an on-skin interface is. Defining this term
was necessary to correctly compile papers. 35 0:01:39.680,0:01:44.080 36 the skin surface and its appendages, 37 This excludes any accessories such as rings or bracelets, garment integrations. Any device that
does not have physical manifestation on the skin 39 0:01:52.800,0:01:57.120 40 wearable accessory --> they were also excluded, 41 The compilation was executed through Keyword matching the ACM Database search engine.
They were then filtered by 43 0:02:04.160,0:02:07.600 44 68 on-skin interface papers, 45 After finalizing the compilation of papers --> they were qualitatively categorized.
The papers were labeled based on 47 0:02:14.240,0:02:16.320 48 0:02:16.320,0:02:18.640 49 their respective Schema Methods 50 which were based off of the Schema methods of Nachtigall et.al. It should be noted that
there were no papers categorized 52 0:02:25.200,0:02:30.320 53 purposes which are also from Nachtigall et,al. 54 The next two categories could only sort specific types of papers: engineering and
applied research papers. These are papers 56 0:02:38.320,0:02:41.680 57 application, These two factors greatly 58 influence the research question and are necessary to analyze
for general engineering papers. The application 60 0:02:49.680,0:02:51.680 61 0:02:51.680,0:02:54.880 62 can be seen in our references section, 63 To decipher these results --> a quantitative analysis is necessary.
This is a graph representing the number 65 0:03:01.360,0:03:05.200 66 published in the latter half of the decade, We 67 can also see a wider variety of conference contributions through the decade and ISWC
UbiComp can be seen as a consistent contributor.
Here is the Percent of Papers from 70 0:03:14.960,0:03:16.880 71 0:03:16.880,0:03:21.280 72 purpose over time, The majority being engineering. 73 This is the body location map, Most devices are located on the skin,
the hand and fingers, and nails.
This is a pie chart of application types. 76 0:03:28.640,0:03:30.240 77 0:03:30.800,0:03:34.320 78 the current state --> measuring impact of paper 79 can show insight into what the domain needs, To do so, the referenced paper Nachtigall,
et al. analyzes the number of citations 81 0:03:42.160,0:03:46.160 82 utilizing the number of citations, 83 We found that papers from 2015 are cited the most on average and are the most impactful.
However post normalization, we see consistent 85 0:03:53.520,0:03:57.360 86 of paper based on schema method and purpose, 87 Applied Research and Engineering papers having the most number of total normalized citations.
Now to the moment we have been waiting for.
What kind of information can we glean 90 0:04:05.600,0:04:09.040 91 Interface research, The "Epidermal 92 Electronics" paper published by Kim et al, from the Material Science field in 2011 served as an
important paper that introduced and inspired 94 0:04:18.000,0:04:21.120 95 being more attuned to user experience --> 96 social perceptions --> and importance of self expression,
our results support the claim with the immense 98 0:04:28.240,0:04:31.120 99 tech development can be reasoned with 100 HCI research’s focus on fabrication methods that are more user-friendly,
inexpensive, and accessible contrary to that of material science.
In terms of Research methods and purposes. We can
see that most publications focus on 104 0:04:43.760,0:04:47.440 105 demonstrated necessity for survey research 106 and of describing papers, The high total number of citations for Applied Research
and Engineering papers can be attributed to 108 0:04:54.320,0:04:57.760 109 per paper implies a consistent high impact 110 survey research and describing papers have on the field despite it’s numbers.
Regarding body location, the initial popularity 112 0:05:05.120,0:05:09.520 113 are easier to test and wear compared to on-skin 114 devices due to the skin surface’s dynamic and elastic characteristics. In recent years,
researchers began exploring more specific and 116 0:05:18.800,0:05:23.040 117 dynamic, We expect more of these in the future. 118 Although this is just a snapshot of current trends in the field, this field demonstrates
great growth and potential. We encourage 120 0:05:29.920,0:05:33.792 121 questions and thank you so much for your time,