>> Neil: SPEAKING OF WATCHING
AND THE REVIEWS ARE IN ON THE
PRESIDENT'S TOUR DEFORCE
PERFORMANCE.
DEMOCRATS TOO WITH THE
PRESIDENT.
AND THEY'RE COMING FROM
DEMOCRATS.
HOUSE DEMOCRATIC STENNY HOYER
SAYING, TODAY'S MEETING OF THE
WHITE HOUSE WAS A POSITIVE STEP
FORWARD AND EVERYONE IN THE ROOM
AGREED TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION
ON DACA.
GOES TO SAY I WAS PLEASED THE
PRESIDENT AGREED THAT WE NEED TO
TOGETHER QUICKLY TO REACH AN
AGREEMENT, PARAPHRASING THERE TO
SAVE MY VOICE.
MARK MEADOWS JOINS US, HOUSE
FREEDOM CAUCUS CHAIRMAN.
YOU HEARD AMONG THE IDEAS THE
PRESIDENT DISCUSSED DO A
SEPARATE DACA DEAL NOW AND
REVISIT THIS SOMETHING A LITTLE
MORE INVOLVED LATER.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
>> LET ME GO INTO THIS.
TODAY WAS PROBABLY HISTORIC DAY
NEGOTIATING ROOM AT THE OVAL
OFFICE.
I WAS IMPRESSED WITH THE
TRANSPARENCY THAT THIS PRESIDENT
WAS WILLING TO DO.
NOW THAT, BEING SAID, I COULD
TELL YOU, JUST LEFT THE HOUSE
FLOOR, WE HAD VOTES, CAME TO
SPEAK TO YOU AND THE VIEWERS.
I CAN TELL YOU, THAT THERE'S AN
BECAUSE WE DEFINE FOUR DIFFERENT
PARAMETERS.
ONE BUSINESS A BORDER SECURITY.
ON THE THEY ARE IS TO GET RID OF
RECIPIENTS.
NOW WE KNOW THERE'S FOUR
PARAMETERS.
THE NEGOTIATING ARE HEADING IN A
SOME PEOPLE LEFT HEARING
DIFFERENT THINGS F THAT'S THE
FIRST STEP OF THIS PROCESS, THEN
WE'RE CERTAINLY WILLING TO LOOK
AT THOSE SUBSTANTIAL THINGS AS
WE MOVE FORWARD.
>> Neil: CHAIRMAN, YOU RUN A
CONSERVATIVE GROUP, PRETTY
CONSERVATIVE GROUP, WHO
OBVIOUSLY WANTED SOMETHING BACK
FOR ADDRESSING THE DACA ISSUE,
THOSE 800,000 OR SO WHO GOT HERE
TO THIS COUNTRY, WITH THEIR
PARENTS ILLEGAL.
THEY WERE SOME BABIES, OR
CHILDREN WHEN THEY GOT HERE.
SO TO LEGALIZE THEM.
YOU WANTED SOME QUID PRO QUO
HERE.
IF THE PRESIDENT SCORES A DEAL,
DEMOCRATS, TO SETTLE THAT ISSUE,
DOWN THE ROAD ADDRESS THESE
OTHER ISSUES, WOULD YOUR MEMBERS
BUY THAT?
STAND-ALONE DEAL THAT ONLY
ADDRESSES THE DACA RECIPIENTS
THAT'S A NONSTARTER IN THE
HOUSE.
>> NO, I KNOW THAT WAS --
>> Neil: THAT WAS NOT YOUR
UNDERSTANDING?
>> NO, IT'S NOT MY
UNDERSTANDING.
I TALKED WITH?
ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS SINCE
THAT MEETING, AND I DON'T KNOW
TELL YOU THAT WHAT THEY'RE
LOOKING AT ARE FOUR PARAMETERS F
WE TALK ABOUT JUST DACA, BY
ITSELF, THAT'S A NONSTARTER HERE
IN THE HOUSE.
THE REASON IS, NEIL, HISTORY
SHOWS FUSS WE DO THAT WE'RE
AND AGAIN.
AND SO IT IS TIME THAT WE
CONGRESS' LAP TO DO THAT.
I BELIEVE IT WILL GET IT DONE
THIS MONTH, POSSIBLY NEXT MONTH.
>> Neil: A TEMPORARY MEASURE TO
GET US TO THE NEXT ONE, RIGHT?
>> I THINK WHATEVER HAPPENS IS
ACTUALLY GOING TO BE REALLY
SUBSTANTIAL IMMIGRATION REFORM.
I THINK IF IT'S GOING TO
ACTUALLY PASS VOTE CHANGERS AND
GO TO THE PRESIDENT, IT WILL BE
SUBSTANTIAL IMMIGRATION REFORM.
>> Neil: BUT NORT BE DONE IN A
FEW WEEKS?
>> THERE'S A BILL INTRODUCED
TOMORROW, THE GOODLAP BILL THAT
HAS MERITS.
I THINK YOU'LL SEE REAL BROAD
THAT >> Neil: THE PRESIDENT
WANTS EARMARKS BACK, DO YOU?
>> I'M NOT A BIG FAN OF
EARMARKS, NO.
I THINK THAT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL
RESPONSIBILITY SHOULD LIE WITH
THE ENTIRE 1.1 TRILLION THAT
WE'RE ABOUT TO APPROPRIATE.
NOT JUST A FEW SMALL DOLLARS.
IT'S NORMALLY A WAY TO PROVIDE
LEVERAGE AND INCREASE SPENDING.
I DON'T KNOW IT'S SOMETHING I
COULD SUPPORT.
>> Neil: EVEN THOUGH THE
PRESIDENT SAYS IT'S WAY TO GET
THIS ONE OF THE FEW THINGS THAT
IS NOT THE PRESIDENT'S DECISION.
IT'S REALLY A DECISION OF THE
SAY AGREES THE SKIDS BY SPENDING